Cited by 77Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyAging, Health, and DisabilityAging and Gerontology Research

Religiousness and Longitudinal Trajectories in Elders' Functional Status

Open access
Nan Sook Park, Klemmack, David L., Roff, Lucinda L., Parker, Michael W., Koenig, Harold G., Sawyer, Patricia, Allman, Richard M.·2008·Research on Aging

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of religiousness on the trajectories of difficulties with activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental ADLs (IADLs) in community-dwelling older adults over a three-year period. Seven waves of data from the University of Alabama at Birmingham Study of Aging were analyzed using a hierarchical linear modeling method. The study was based on the 784 participants who completed interviews every six months between December 1999 and February 2004. Frequent religious service attendance was associated with fewer ADL difficulties and IADL difficulties at baseline. Furthermore, religious service attendance predicted slower increases for frequent churchgoers and steeper increases for less frequent churchgoers in IADL difficulties, controlling for variables related to demographics and resources. Religious service attendance was independently associated with ADL and IADL difficulties cross-sectionally. However, significant protective effects of religious service attendance were identified longitudinally only for the IADL trajectory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0164027507313001

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Considering the 33 highest quality studies, 13 (39%) reported significantly better physical functioning among those who were more R/S (including one study at a trend level).

    “Considering the 33 highest quality studies, 13 (39%) reported significantly better physical functioning among those who were more R/S (including one study at a trend level) [483–495], six (18%) found worse functioning [496–501], and five studies (15%) reported mixed results [82, 124, 502–504] (significant positive and negative associations, depending on R/S characteristic).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 77

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Alabama Rural Health Association . Health Status of Rural Alabamians. Alabama Rural Health Association; Montgomery: 1998. [Google Scholar]
  2. Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics . Older Americans 2004: Key Indicators of Well-Being. U.S. Government Printing Office; Washington, DC: 2004. [Google Scholar]
  3. George Linda K., Ellison Christopher G., Larson David B. Explaining the Relationships Between Involvement and Health. Psychological Inquiry. 2002;13:190–200. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kovar Mary G., Lawton Powell M. Functional Disability: Activities and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living. In: Lawton PM, Teresi JA, editors. Focus on Assessment Techniques. Springer; New York: 1994. pp. 57–75. [Google Scholar]
  5. Pearson Valinda I. Assessment of Function in Older Adults. In: Kane RL, Kane RA, editors. Assessing Older Persons. Oxford University Press; New York: 2000. pp. 17–48. [Google Scholar]
  6. Raudenbush Stephen W., Bryk Anthony S., Congdon Richard. HLM6: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling. Scientific Software International; Lincolnwood, IL: 2005. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ren Xinhua S., Kasix Lewis, Meenan Robert F. Short-Form Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales: Tests of Reliability and Validity Among Patients with Osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Research. 1999;40:1267–74. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199906)12:3<163::aid-art3>3.0.co;2-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  8. Shirey Lee, Summer Laura. Caregiving: Helping the Elderly With Activity Limitations. National Academy on an Aging Society; Washington, DC: 2000. [Google Scholar]
  9. Snijders Tom A. B., Bosker Roel J. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. Sage; Thousand Oaks, CA: 1999. [Google Scholar]

Authors
Park, N. S., Klemmack, D. L., Roff, L. L., Parker, M. W., Koenig, H. G., Sawyer, P., & Allman, R. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Venue
Research on Aging
Published
2008-02-08
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
279-298
ISSN
  • 0164-0275 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7573
OpenAlex
W1978672604
Cited by
77
References
46
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research on Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG015062)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
religiosity, religious service attendance, functional status, activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, older adults, community-dwelling older adults, functional decline trajectories, aging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review