Cited by 56Retirement, Disability, and EmploymentDiscrimination and Equality LawLabor Law and Work Dynamics

International comparison of age discrimination laws

Open access
Lahey, Joanna N.·2010·Research on Aging

Abstract

European age discrimination legislation is discussed in the context of the U.S. Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) and related state laws. U.S. law was originally introduced to protect productive older workers from age stereotypes, but more recently preventing age discrimination has become important as a means of keeping costs down on entitlement programs as the population ages. Changes in enforcement, penalties, exemptions, length of time to file, and burden of proof have changed the effects of the laws over time. The ADEA has had both positive effects on currently employed older workers and negative effects on the hiring of older workers. Enforcement and publicity are offered as possible explanations for the strength of these positive and negative effects. Age discrimination legislation in Europe, indicated in the Framework Directive 2000/78, is driven by economic and political considerations. European legislation calls for less enforcement and more exemptions than the corresponding U.S. cases that could lead to smaller effects on employment. However, pensions, disability, unemployment, and social security potentially have a stronger effect on social norms for retirement age than does anti-discrimination legislation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0164027510379348

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The regional difference in age discrimination is in line with Lahey (2010) in that legislation and social norms around working at an advanced age are on average more lenient in the United States compared to European countries.

    “This finding is also in line with the analysis of Lahey (2010) in that the legislation and social norms around working at an advanced age are on average more lenient in the United States compared to European countries.”

    From The state of hiring discrimination: A meta-analysis of (almost) all recent correspondence experiments (2023) · cites this paper as Lahey, 2010

    The Abstract says European age-discrimination laws generally provide less enforcement and more exemptions than corresponding US laws, and the European Case section notes that many European countries permit mandatory retirement ages. This supports a legal comparison favorable to continued work at older ages in the US. The Conclusion discusses social norms around older employment but does not establish that US social norms are, on average, more permissive than European ones. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Acemoglu Daron Angrist Joshua 2001 Consequence of employment protection? The case of the Americans with Disabilities Act Journal of Political Economy 19 915 950
  2. Almeida Joana ten Bokum N Flanagan T Sands R von Steinau-Steinruck R 2009 Portugal 271 283 Age Discrimination Law in Europe The Netherlands Wolters Kluwer: Law and Buisness
  3. Ashenfelter Orley Card David 2002 Did the Elimination of Mandatory Retirement Affect Faculty Retirement American Economic Review 92 4 957 80
  4. Adnett Nick Hardy Stephen 2007 The Peculiar Case of Age Discrimination: Americanising the European Social Model? European Journal of Law and Economics 23 29 41
  5. Banatvala Sarah Flanagan Tom ten Bokum N Flanagan T Sands R von Steinau-Steinruck R 2009 United Kingdom 375 390 Age Discrimination Law in Europe The Netherlands Wolters Kluwer: Law and Buisness
  6. Bazilescu Cristina ten Bokum N Flanagan T Sands R von Steinau-Steinruck R 2009 Romania 285 295 Age Discrimination Law in Europe The Netherlands Wolters Kluwer: Law and Buisness
  7. Bell Mark 2002 Anti-Discrimination Law and the European Union New York Oxford University Press
  8. Brincat Matthew ten Bokum N Flanagan T Sands R von Steinau-Steinruck R 2009 Malta 233 242 Age Discrimination Law in Europe The Netherlands Wolters Kluwer: Law and Buisness
  9. Castagnaro Guy Claverie Ariane ten Bokum N Flanagan T Sands R von Steinau-Steinruck R 2009 Luxembourg 217 232 Age Discrimination Law in Europe The Netherlands Wolters Kluwer: Law and Buisness
  10. Čermák Tomáš Sturdíková Karin ten Bokum N Flanagan T Sands R von Steinau-Steinruck R 2009 Slovakia 309 326 Age Discrimination Law in Europe The Netherlands Wolters Kluwer: Law and Buisness
  11. Cortadi Eva Sainz Aragon Jesus Domingo ten Bokum N Flanagan T Sands R von Steinau-Steinruck R 2009 Spain 339 346 Age Discrimination Law in Europe The Netherlands Wolters Kluwer: Law and Buisness
  12. DeLeire Thomas 2000 The Wage and Employment Effects of the Americans with Disabilities Act Journal of Human Resources 35 4 693 715
  13. Emilianides Achilles C ten Bokum N Flanagan T Sands R von Steinau-Steinruck R 2009 Cyprus 55 63 Age Discrimination Law in Europe The Netherlands Wolters Kluwer: Law and Buisness
  14. Gregory Raymond F 2001 Old at a Young Age New Brunswick, NJ Rutgers University Press
  15. Hersch Joni Kip Viscusi W 2004 Punitive Damages: How Judges and Juries Perform Journal of Legal Studies 33 1 36
  16. Iliadou Tati ten Bokum N Flanagan T Sands R von Steinau-Steinruck R 2009 Greece 141 156 Age Discrimination Law in Europe The Netherlands Wolters Kluwer: Law and Buisness
  17. Jolls Christine 1996 Hands-Tying and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act Texas Law Review 74 1813 46
  18. Karacholova Maria Yaneva Tanya ten Bokum N Flanagan T Sands R von Steinau-Steinruck R 2009 Bulgaria 39 54 Age Discrimination Law in Europe The Netherlands Wolters Kluwer: Law and Buisness
  19. Koto Lassi Viljakainen Petteri ten Bokum N Flanagan T Sands R von Steinau-Steinruck R 2009 Finland 103 114 Age Discrimination Law in Europe The Netherlands Wolters Kluwer: Law and Buisness
  20. Krisch Imre Kürti Nora ten Bokum N Flanagan T Sands R von Steinau-Steinruck R 2009 Hungary 157 170 Age Discrimination Law in Europe The Netherlands Wolters Kluwer: Law and Buisness
  21. Lahey Joanna 2008a Age, Women, and Hiring: An Experimental Study Journal of Human Resources 43 1 30 56
  22. Lahey 2008b State Age Discrimination Laws and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act Journal of Law and Economics 51 3 433 60
  23. Langford Kevin Casey Sinead ten Bokum N Flanagan T Sands R von Steinau-Steinruck R 2009 Ireland 171 181 Age Discrimination Law in Europe The Netherlands Wolters Kluwer: Law and Buisness
  24. Madsen Sofie Høeg ten Bokum N Flanagan T Sands R von Steinau-Steinruck R 2009 Denmark 77 86 Age Discrimination Law in Europe The Netherlands Wolters Kluwer: Law and Buisness
  25. Mertinz Anna ten Bokum N Flanagan T Sands R von Steinau-Steinruck R 2009 Austria 1 18 Age Discrimination Law in Europe The Netherlands Wolters Kluwer: Law and Buisness
  26. Mitchell Olivia S Luzadis R Annamarie 1988 Changes in Pension Incentives through Time Industrial and Labor Relations Review 42 1 100 08
  27. Neumark David Stock Wendy A 1999 Age Discrimination Laws and Labor Market Efficiency Journal of Political Economy 107 5 1081 125
  28. Penal Code of Finland. 2003. Chapter 47, Section 3.
  29. Radoccia Stefania ten Bokum N Flanagan T Sands R von Steinau-Steinruck R 2009 Italy 183 198 Age Discrimination Law in Europe The Netherlands Wolters Kluwer: Law and Buisness
  30. Riesenhuber Karl ten Bokum N Flanagan T Sands R von Steinau-Steinruck R 2009 The EC Anti-Discrimination Framework Directive 2000/78 xxvii xlvi Age Discrimination Law in Europe The Netherlands Wolters Kluwer: Law and Buisness
  31. Rooth Dan 2009 Obesity, Attractiveness, and Differential Treatment in Hiring: A Field Experiment Journal of Human Resources 44 3 710 735
  32. Sands Roselyn Tour Laurent-Paul Truchot Mathilde ten Bokum N Flanagan T Sands R von Steinau-Steinruck R 2009 France 115 124 Age Discrimination Law in Europe The Netherlands Wolters Kluwer: Law and Buisness
  33. Schuster Michael Miller Christopher S Christopher S 1984 An Empirical Assessment of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act Industrial and Labor Relations Review 38 1 64 74
  34. Smith v. City of Jackson, 544 U.S. 228, 241 (2005).
  35. Stalhåmmar Jessica ten Bokum N Flanagan T Sands R von Steinau-Steinruck R 2009 Sweden 347 352 Age Discrimination Law in Europe The Netherlands Wolters Kluwer: Law and Buisness
  36. Steinau-Steinrück Robert von Vernuft Cord ten Bokum N Flanagan T Sands R von Steinau-Steinruck R 2009 Germany 125 140 Age Discrimination Law in Europe The Netherlands Wolters Kluwer: Law and Buisness
  37. Stox Yves ten Bokum N Flanagan T Sands R von Steinau-Steinruck R 2009 Belgium 19 38 Age Discrimination Law in Europe The Netherlands Wolters Kluwer: Law and Buisness
  38. Ten Bokum Nicky Hoekerd Ilya ten Bokum N Flanagan T Sands R von Steinau-Steinruck R 2009 The Netherlands 243 256 Age Discrimination Law in Europe The Netherlands Wolters Kluwer: Law and Buisness
  39. Ten Bokum Nicky Flanagan Tom Sands Roselyn von Steinau-Steinruck Robert 2009 Age Discrimination Law in Europe The Netherlands Wolters Kluwer: Law and Business

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lahey, J. N.
Affiliations
Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Lahey, Joanna N.
Venue
Research on Aging
Published
2010-08-27
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
679-697
ISSN
  • 0164-0275 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7573
OpenAlex
W2135373470
Cited by
56
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research on Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (T32AG000244)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Law › Discrimination and Equality Law
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Labor Law and Work Dynamics
Keywords
age discrimination law, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, older workers, employment of older workers, law enforcement, burden of proof, exemptions, retirement age, social security, disability benefits, unemployment benefits, age stereotypes, comparative law

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review