Cited by 117Child Welfare and AdoptionChild Nutrition and Water AccessInfant Development and Preterm Care

Health status, cognitive and motor development of young children adopted from China, East Asia, and Russia across the first 6 months after adoption

Pomerleau, Andrée, Malcuit, Gérard, Chicoine, Jean-François, Séguin, Renée, Belhumeur, Céline, Germain, Patricia, Amyot, Isabelle, Jéliu, Gloria·2005·International Journal of Behavioral Development

Abstract

We compared health status, anthropometric and psychological development of 123 children adopted before 18 months of age from China, East Asia (Vietnam, Taiwan, Thailand, South Korea, Cambodia), and Eastern Europe (mostly Russia). Data were collected close to the time of arrival, and 3 and 6 months later. Anthropometric measures included weight, height, and head circumference percentiles, and weight/height and height/age ratios (indices of acute and chronic malnutrition, respectively). We assessed cognitive (MDI) and motor (PDI) developments with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (Bayley, 1993). At time of arrival, children presented physical, cognitive, and motor delays, as well as health problems. Growth parameters improved with time, but differently among the groups. East Asian children, in a better physical state at time of arrival, changed less than the others did across time. Children adopted from Russia globally had lower MDI than the others, while children adopted from East Asia had the highest PDI. Hierarchical linear modelling indicated that initial MDI was related to height/age ratio (index of chronic malnutrition), while its change over time was related to age at time of arrival. PDI was also related to height/age ratio, as well as to presence/absence of neurological signs at time of arrival. Infants with a higher risk index had lower MDI and PDI initial scores.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/01650250500206257

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In children adopted from Romania, those who had spent less than 6 months in an institution had significantly better motor skills than those who had spent more than 6 months in an institution.

    “In children adopted from Romania, those who had spent less than 6 months in an institution had significantly better motor skills than those who had spent more than 6 months in an institution.22”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 117

Authors
Pomerleau, A., Malcuit, G., Chicoine, J.-F., Séguin, R., Belhumeur, C., Germain, P., Amyot, I., & Jéliu, G.
Affiliations
  • Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Hôpital Ste-Justine, Université de Montréal, Canada
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Development
Published
2005-09
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
445-457
ISSN
  • 0165-0254 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0651
OpenAlex
W2101486362
Cited by
117
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
11.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Behavioral Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
international adoption, cognitive development, motor development, health status, anthropometric growth, chronic malnutrition, acute malnutrition, head circumference, Bayley Scales of Infant Development, neurological signs, age at arrival

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review