Cited by 277Resilience and Mental HealthPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild Abuse and Trauma

Child development and family mental health in war and military violence: The Palestinian experience

Qouta, Samir, Punamäki, Raija-Leena, El Sarraj, Eyad·2008·International Journal of Behavioral Development

Abstract

The article reviews developmental research among Palestinians living in Gaza. The aims are, first, to analyze how exposure to traumatic events associates with children's mental health and their cognitive, emotional and social development. Second, we aimed to model familial and symbolic processes that can either harm or protect the mental health of children. Third, we wanted to learn who the resilient children are in conditions of war and military violence. The reviewed research has been conducted in the context of a Palestinian non-governmental organization, the Gaza Community Mental Health Programme, during the political upheavals involving hopes for peace and intensive war and violence: the First Intifada (1987—1993), the Palestinian Authority rule (1994— ) and the Second Al Aqsa Intifada (2001— ). The results show that life threat, violence and losses form a risk for increased psychological distress. There are, however, a myriad of child, family and society related factors and psycho-socio-physiological processes that protect child development and mental health. They include, e.g. loving and wisely guiding parenting, children's flexible and high cognitive capacity, flexible and multiple coping strategies and narrative and symbolic nocturnal dreaming, as well as social support and good peer relations. Different models explain psychological distress and positive resources, including child resilience. Exposure to trauma is crucial in predicting distress, while familial and developmental issues are important in building resilience. Children's conscious and unconscious cognitive-emotional processes are crucial for underlying mental health and knowledge about them is important in tailoring evidence-based preventive interventions among war victims.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0165025408090973

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 68 · Cited by 277

Authors
Qouta, S., Punamäki, R.-L., & El Sarraj, E.
Affiliations
  • Gaza Community Mental Health Programme, Gaza, Palestine
  • University of Tampere (FI)
Corresponding author
Punamäki, Raija-Leena
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Development
Published
2008-07
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
310-321
ISSN
  • 0165-0254 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0651
OpenAlex
W2076594944
Cited by
277
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 12
FWCI
14.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Behavioral Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
child development, child mental health, Palestinian children, Gaza Strip, trauma exposure, child resilience, parenting, coping strategies, social support, peer relationships, psychological distress, First Intifada, Second Intifada, preventive interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review