The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Parent emotional regulation: A meta-analytic review of its association with parenting and child adjustment
Open accessAbstract
We conducted a meta-analytic review of 53 studies published between 2000 and 2020 to quantify associations of parents’ emotion regulation with parenting behavior and children’s emotion regulation and internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Twelve meta-analyses, which included between 4 to 22 effect sizes ( N from 345 to 3609), were conducted to summarize associations of parent emotion regulation with positive or negative parenting behaviors and child outcomes of emotion regulation, difficulties in emotion regulation, internalizing symptoms, or externalizing behavior. Given the range of behavioral parent emotion regulation measures used across studies, effect sizes for parent emotion regulation strategy use ( skill) were analyzed separately from effect sizes for parents’ difficulties with emotion regulation. Summary effect sizes ranged from |.08| to |.28| for relations of parent emotion regulation skill with parenting behaviors and children’s adjustment. Summary effect sizes ranged from |.03| to |.42| for relations of parent emotion regulation difficulties with parenting behaviors and children’s adjustment. In general, parents with better emotion regulation skill or fewer difficulties are higher in positive parenting behaviors and have children with better emotion regulation and fewer internalizing symptoms. Evidence was less clear-cut for child externalizing behaviors. Significant effect size heterogeneity was observed in most analyses, and study characteristics (measures, child age, parent gender, sampling, and region where the study was conducted) were examined as moderators. Measures used, child age, and participant risk status moderated effect size in some analyses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348 · Cited by 11,929 · cited 2×
“The most common measures used to assess parents’ emotion regulation were the DERS (25 studies, 47%; Gratz & Roemer, 2004) or the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ; 13 studies, 25%; Gross & John, 2003).”
BackgroundMethodGratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1023/b:joba.0000007455.08539.94 · Cited by 8,942 · cited 19×
“Emotion regulation type and child age moderated effect size; the effect size was larger in studies using the DERS (.24, p < .001) or a general measure of difficulties in emotion regulation (.26, p ¼ .002) relative to studies of expressive suppression (�.02, p ¼ .806).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialEmotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review
Aldao, A., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Schweizer, S. (2010) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.004 · Cited by 6,686 · cited 2×
“This finding for parents’ suppression of emotion is not completely surprising, as reviews of research on suppression and its association with adults’ own symptoms of psychopathology tend to range in effect size and can be nonsignificant (e.g., Aldao et al., 2010).”
BackgroundResultParenting style as context: An integrative model.
Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1993) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.487 · Cited by 4,313
The Role of the Family Context in the Development of Emotion Regulation
Morris, A. S., Silk, J. S., Steinberg, L., Myers, S. S., & Robinson, L. R. (2007) · Social Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00389.x · Cited by 3,027
EMOTION REGULATION: A THEME IN SEARCH OF DEFINITION
Thompson, R. A. (2008) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5834.1994.tb01276.x · Cited by 2,963
Maternal depression and parenting behavior
Lovejoy, M. C., Graczyk, P. A., O'Hare, E., & Neuman, G. (2000) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/s0272-7358(98)00100-7 · Cited by 2,667
Parental Socialization of Emotion
Eisenberg, N., Cumberland, A., & Spinrad, T. L. (1998) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0904_1 · Cited by 2,641
Eysenck, H. J. (1983) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(83)90055-4 · Cited by 2,386
Cited by
Featherston, R., Barlow, J., Song, Y., Haysom, Z., Loy, B., Tufford, L., & Shlonsky, A. (2024) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd012445.pub2 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Rudolph, J., Kerin, J., & Bohadana-Brown, G.
- Venue
- International Journal of Behavioral Development
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-10-25
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 63-82
- ISSN
- 0165-0254 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0651
- OpenAlex
- W3211114502
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 99
- FWCI
- 16.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parent emotional regulation: A meta-analytic review of its association with parenting and child adjustment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/01650254211051086
- The paper
- Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Rudolph, J., Kerin, J., & Bohadana-Brown, G. (2022). Parent emotional regulation: A meta-analytic review of its association with parenting and child adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/01650254211051086
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.