From information- to knowledge-management: the role of rule induction and neural net machine learning techniques in knowledge generation
Abstract
Developments in artificial intelligence mean that it is now increasingly possible to store not only information but also knowledge as an exploitable resource. Insofar as he or she is concerned with creating, organizing and monitoring knowledge resources to support effective decision making within an organization, the information manager is developing the role of knowledge manager. As well as its organization and dissemina tion, the generation of storable knowledge is very much on the agenda of the knowledge manager. The extent to which com puters can help in the process of knowledge generation is central to his or her concerns. Machine learning techniques have been developed which are capable of giving us an increasing amount of help in this process. The contributions of rule induction and artificial neural net systems are discussed. It is likely that such tech niques will prove to be useful tools both for the information/knowledge manager requiring practical working systems enabling the cost-effective exploitation of knowledge resources, and for the information/knowledge scientist requir ing advances in our more fundamental theoretical knowledge of the nature of information and ways of processing it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neural networks are at the forefront of the current expansion in AI even though applications can be found as far back as the 1980s.
“Neural networks, more precisely artificial neural networks (ANN), are intended to mimic the way the human brain works, and are at the forefront of the current expansion in AI even though applications can be found as far back as the 1980s (Ford, 1989).”
From Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of Big Data – evolution, challenges and research agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Ford, 1989
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.021 · Cited by 2,628 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ford, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Ford, Nigel
- ORCID
- Ford, Nigel
- Venue
- Journal of Information Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1989-08
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4-5
- Pages
- 299-304
- ISSN
- 0165-5515 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-6485
- OpenAlex
- W2050028606
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 0.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Information Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Knowledge Management and Technology
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
- Keywords
- knowledge management, knowledge production, rule induction, artificial neural networks, machine learning, information management, knowledge resources, decision support, knowledge management systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review