The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In Search of Organizational Virtue in Business: Agents, Goods, Practices, Institutions and Environments
Open accessAbstract
In this paper we argue that MacIntyre’s virtues-goods-practice-institution schema (MacIntyre 1985) provides a conceptual framework within which organizational virtue in general, and virtue in business in particular, can be explored. A heuristic device involving levels of individual agency, mode of institutionalization and environment is used to discuss why some businesses protect practices, develop virtues and encourage the exercise of moral agency in their decision making, while others struggle or fail to do so. In relation to conventional shareholder-owned capitalist business, both the mode of institutionalization and the environment are shown to be largely antithetical to the development of practices. Other businesses may meet the necessary internal conditions for the sustenance of practice-like features but remain dependent upon features within their environments. To illustrate this, we use participant observation to show how one particular organization—Traidcraft plc—meets the relevant conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Misappropriation of MacIntyre
Beadle, R. (2002) · Philosophy of Management · doi:10.5840/pom2002226 · Cited by 59 · cited 1×
“From this it is clear that MacIntyre‟s arguments for and developments of virtue ethics, and their application specifically to the area of business, are already well documented and have received critical review (see Beadle 2002; Moore 2002, 2005a, 2005b, for example).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Cited by
Philosophical Foundations of Workplace Spirituality: A Critical Approach
Gotsis, G., & Kortezi, Z. (2008) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9369-5 · Cited by 334
Wright, T. A., & Goodstein, J. (2007) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206307307644 · Cited by 209
Re-Imagining the Morality of Management: A Modern Virtue Ethics Approach
Moore, G. (2008) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.5840/beq200818435 · Cited by 189
Self-citationManagerial Work in a Practice-Embodying Institution: The Role of Calling, The Virtue of Constancy
Beadle, R. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1678-2 · Cited by 85
Self-citationPractical wisdom in complex medical practices: a critical proposal
Bontemps-Hommen, C. M. M. L., Baart, A., & Vosman, F. T. H. (2019) · Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-018-9846-x · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, G., & Beadle, R.
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 369-389
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W2163309362
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Search of Organizational Virtue in Business: Agents, Goods, Practices, Institutions and Environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0170840606062427
- The paper
- Moore, G., & Beadle, R. (2006). In Search of Organizational Virtue in Business: Agents, Goods, Practices, Institutions and Environments. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606062427
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.