Cited by 259Critical Realism in SociologyQualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsManagement and Organizational Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Gentle Art of Retroduction: Critical Realism, Cultural Political Economy and Critical Grounded Theory

Belfrage, Claes, Hauf, Felix·2017·Organization Studies

Abstract

This article, first, proposes critical grounded theory (CGT) as a way to develop systematically an array of methods and theoretical propositions into a coherent critical methodology for organization studies (and beyond). Second, it demonstrates CGT’s usefulness through a case study of competing recovery projects from the Icelandic financial crisis. CGT is developed in engagement with the emerging paradigm of cultural political economy (CPE) and its preferred method of critical discourse analysis (CDA). CPE analyses the evolution of ‘economic imaginaries’ in both their structural/material and semiotic/discursive dimensions. This requires a critical realist, multi-dimensional research strategy which emphasizes ethnographic methods and substantial theoretical and historical work. The proposed methodology of CGT enables a retroductive research process that combines deductive theoretical deskwork with inductive fieldwork enabled by grounded theory tools to analyse organizational process, stability and change.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0170840616663239

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Debray R., 1973, Prison writings
  2. Fleetwood S., 2004, Critical realist applications in organization and management studies
  3. Gissurarson H. H., 2004, Wall Street Journal, 29, 1
  4. Glaser B. G., 1992, Emergence vs. forcing: Basics of grounded theory analysis
  5. Glaser B. G., 1967, The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research
  6. Jaeggi R., 2014, Alienation
  7. 10.4337/9781845428907 · DOI
  8. Krugman P. (2011). A Song of Ice and Ire: Iceland in context. Presented at Conference Iceland’s Recovery: Lessons and Challenges, 27 October, co-hosted by the International Monetary Fund, Central Bank of Iceland and Iceland Ministry of Economic Affairs. Available at: http://www.imf.org/external/np/seminars/eng/2011/isl/index.htm (accessed 10 November 2011).
  9. Sayer A., 1998, Critical realism: Essential readings, 120
  10. Stockhammer E., 2008, Competition & Change, 12, 184
  11. Wade R., 2009, Challenge, 52, 5

Metadata

Authors
Belfrage, C., & Hauf, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Corresponding author
Belfrage, Claes
Venue
Organization Studies
Published
2016-09-25
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
251-271
ISSN
  • 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3044
OpenAlex
W2511869857
Cited by
259
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 110 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
24.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Organization Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Realism in Sociology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
critical realism, cultural political economy, critical discourse analysis, economic imaginaries, Icelandic financial crisis, critical methodology, organizational change, organizational stability, ethnographic methods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review