The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental Disturbances and Organizational Transitions and Transformations: Some Alternative Models
Abstract
This paper is built on the premise that organizational change can only be understood by tracing the process, track or pathway a disturbance/kick/jolt takes through an organization. Its dominant concern is to build alternative processual models of organizational transitions and transformations which occur following different environmental disturbances. Four models of organizational change are developed (models of 'rebuttal', 'reorientation', 'colonization' and 'evolution') derived from the literature on organizational change and developed using some aspects of Habermas' critical theory. These models are intentionally embryonic and skeletal, requiring detailed case studies to amplify their nature. As a start to this amplification, aspects of two case studies are presented which illustrate respectively 'reorientation' and 'colonization' change pathways. Finally, given the rudimentary stage in our understanding of the dynamics of change, pointers to future research are given in the conclusion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113
Cited by
HR managers and environmental sustainability: strategic leaders or passive observers?
Harris, C., & Tregidga, H. (2012) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.561221 · Cited by 88
The United Kingdom government’s ‘business case’ approach to the regulation of retirement
FLYNN, M. (2010) · Ageing and Society · doi:10.1017/s0144686x09990705 · Cited by 41
Middle-Range Thinking and Management Control Systems
Broadbent, J., & Laughlin, R. (2014) · Management Control and Uncertainty · doi:10.1057/9781137392121_17 · Cited by 4
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Laughlin, R. C.
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1991-04
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 209-232
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W2022538355
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.