The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Corporate Strategy, Organizations, and Subjectivity: A Critique
Abstract
This paper attempts to develop a new approach to the study of corporate strategy. It draws on the methodology of Michel Foucault to suggest that corporate strategy can be seen as a discourse which has its own specific conditions of possibility. These are traced historically to various exercises of power within the conduct of war and the development of business organizations. Strategy is located as an emergent set of practices which has distinctive power effects on organizations and subjectivity. Analyses of strategy cannot be reduced either to rationalist accounts of markets and environments nor interpretive understandings of actors' frames of reference. The emergence and reproduction of 'strategy' as an essential element in managerial discourse needs to be located in specific changes in organizations and managerial subjectivity, because it is a mechanism of power that transforms individuals into particular kinds of subjects who secure a sense of well-being through participation in strategic practices. Conflict over 'strategy' is therefore more than just a question of career politics and market competition. It touches on the very sense of what it is to be human as well as having effects that readily legitimize prevailing relations of inequality and privilege in contemporary organizations and institutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Completing the Practice Turn in Strategy Research
Whittington, R. (2006) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840606064101 · Cited by 1,972
Discourse and Collaboration: The Role of Conversations and Collective Identity
Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Grant, D. (2005) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2005.15281426 · Cited by 698
Templates and Turns in Qualitative Studies of Strategy and Management
Langley, A., & Abdallah, C. (2011) · Research Methodology in Strategy and Management · doi:10.1108/s1479-8387(2011)0000006007 · Cited by 579
Chia, R., & MacKay, B. (2007) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726707075291 · Cited by 533
Enterprise Discourse, Professional Identity and the Organizational Control of Hospital Clinicians
Doolin, B. (2002) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840602233003 · Cited by 359
Metadata
- Authors
- Knights, D., & Morgan, G.
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1991-04
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 251-273
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W2149797758
- Cited by
- 980
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corporate Strategy, Organizations, and Subjectivity: A Critique. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/017084069101200205
- The paper
- Knights, D., & Morgan, G. (1991). Corporate Strategy, Organizations, and Subjectivity: A Critique. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069101200205
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.