Cited by 187Gender Politics and RepresentationGender Diversity and InequalityElectoral Systems and Political Participation

Quotas and intersectionality: Ethnicity and gender in candidate selection

Celis, Karen, Erzeel, Silvia, Mügge, Liza, Damstra, Alyt·2014·International Political Science Review

Abstract

Gender equality is not fully realised when it is restricted to ethnic majority men and women. This article examines how gender quotas as a form of equality policy affect ethnic minority groups, in particular, the gender balance among ethnic minority candidates for political office. Our analysis focuses on the selection of ethnic minority candidates in Belgium, where legally binding quotas exist, and in the Netherlands, where they do not. Drawing on 23 interviews with central actors in four main parties in each country, we find that the process of ethnic minority candidate selection is highly gendered: in both countries, ethnic minority women are represented in larger numbers than ethnic minority men. But gender quotas play a lesser role in this than the more general concern for diversity on electoral lists, the institutionalisation of gender/ethnicity within political parties and the strategic choices of party leaders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0192512113507733

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 56 · Cited by 187

Authors
Celis, K., Erzeel, S., Mügge, L., & Damstra, A.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
  • UCLouvain (BE)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
International Political Science Review
Published
2014-01
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
41-54
ISSN
  • 0192-5121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-373X
OpenAlex
W2151808177
Cited by
187
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
26.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Political Science Review (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Politics and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
gender quotas, intersectionality, ethnic minority candidates, candidate selection, political parties, gender balance, ethnic minority women, party institutionalization, Belgium, Netherlands

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review