Cited by 224Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsPsychosocial Factors Impacting Youth

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long-Term Effects of Parenting Practices During Adolescence on Well-Being Outcomes in Young Adulthood

Open access
AQUILINO, WILLIAM S., SUPPLE, ANDREW J.·2001·Journal of Family Issues

Abstract

This research investigated the consequences of parent-child relationships during adolescence for young adults' well-being and substance use. Analysis of longitudinal data from the National Survey of Families and Households provided support for the hypothesis that parent-adolescent relationships have long-term consequences for young adult well-being and behavior. The findings are consistent with individuation theory and show that coercive parental control in adolescence is associated with lower well-being and more substance use in young adulthood. The long-term effects of parenting were mediated in part by the effects of parenting on adolescent adjustment, which influenced well-being in young adulthood.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/019251301022003002

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Baumrind, D., Family transitions, 111
  2. 10.2307/1131263 · DOI
  3. Openshaw, D. K., Adolescents in families, 104
  4. 10.2307/1130981 · DOI · Paper page
  5. White, K. M., Adolescent development in the family: New directions for child development

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–224 of 224

Metadata

Authors
AQUILINO, W. S., & SUPPLE, A. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
Venue
Journal of Family Issues
Published
2001-04
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
289-308
ISSN
  • 0192-513X (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5481
OpenAlex
W2165380520
Cited by
224
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Family Issues (publishedVersion)
  • NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
Keywords
parenting practices, parent-adolescent relationships, adolescent adjustment, substance use, mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review