Love as a battlefield: attachment and relationship dynamics in couples identified for male partner violence
Abstract
The authors explored the attachment dynamics of heterosexual couples identified for male partner violence. Based on semistructured interviews, participants were assessed for attachment orientations. Based on a thematic analysis of the interviews, two strategies for regulating distance within these relationships were identified: pursuit and distancing. Partners' abusive acts often appeared to serve one of these attachment strategies. As a pursuit strategy, violence forced one partner to focus on the other, and as a distancing strategy, violence served to push a partner back when the perpetrator had been approached too closely and perceived no other means of escape or self-protection. To understand the context in which individuals acted abusively, the authors considered the interaction between the attachment orientations of both partners as they sought to regulate their emotional and physical proximity. Findings highlight the relational basis of intimate violence.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mutual violence seems to occur when there is at least one partner with preoccupied attachment, in the dismissing-anxious couple pattern, when both partners present anxious attachment, or when they show high rates on both attachment dimensions of anxiety and avoidance.
“According to studies that investigated the relationship between partners attachment and IPV, not making distinctions between different forms of violence, mutual violence seems to occur when there is at least on partner with preoccupied attachment (Bookwala and Zdaniuk, 1998; Bookwala, 2002), in the dismissing-anxious couple pattern (Bond and Bond, 2004), when both partners present anxious”
From Exploring Relationships: A Systematic Review on Intimate Partner Violence and Attachment (2018) · cites this paper as Allison et al., 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 165
- Authors
- Allison, C. J., Bartholomew, K., Mayseless, O., & Dutton, D. G.
- Affiliations
- Simon Fraser University (CA)
- University of Haifa (IL)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- ORCID
- Mayseless, Ofra
- Venue
- Journal of Family Issues
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-10-16
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 125-150
- ISSN
- 0192-513X (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5481
- OpenAlex
- W2143817089
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 2.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Family Issues (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Keywords
- intimate partner violence, attachment orientation, heterosexual couples, emotional distance, self-protection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review