Cited by 165Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceAttachment and Relationship DynamicsFamily Dynamics and Relationships

Love as a battlefield: attachment and relationship dynamics in couples identified for male partner violence

Allison, Colleen J., Bartholomew, Kim, Mayseless, Ofra, Dutton, Donald G.·2008·Journal of Family Issues

Abstract

The authors explored the attachment dynamics of heterosexual couples identified for male partner violence. Based on semistructured interviews, participants were assessed for attachment orientations. Based on a thematic analysis of the interviews, two strategies for regulating distance within these relationships were identified: pursuit and distancing. Partners' abusive acts often appeared to serve one of these attachment strategies. As a pursuit strategy, violence forced one partner to focus on the other, and as a distancing strategy, violence served to push a partner back when the perpetrator had been approached too closely and perceived no other means of escape or self-protection. To understand the context in which individuals acted abusively, the authors considered the interaction between the attachment orientations of both partners as they sought to regulate their emotional and physical proximity. Findings highlight the relational basis of intimate violence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0192513x07306980

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mutual violence seems to occur when there is at least one partner with preoccupied attachment, in the dismissing-anxious couple pattern, when both partners present anxious attachment, or when they show high rates on both attachment dimensions of anxiety and avoidance.

    “According to studies that investigated the relationship between partners attachment and IPV, not making distinctions between different forms of violence, mutual violence seems to occur when there is at least on partner with preoccupied attachment (Bookwala and Zdaniuk, 1998; Bookwala, 2002), in the dismissing-anxious couple pattern (Bond and Bond, 2004), when both partners present anxious”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 165

Authors
Allison, C. J., Bartholomew, K., Mayseless, O., & Dutton, D. G.
Affiliations
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • University of Haifa (IL)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Journal of Family Issues
Published
2007-10-16
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
125-150
ISSN
  • 0192-513X (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5481
OpenAlex
W2143817089
Cited by
165
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Family Issues (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
intimate partner violence, attachment orientation, heterosexual couples, emotional distance, self-protection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review