Mothers’ Post-separation Experiences of Male Partner Abuse: An Exploratory Study
Open accessAbstract
Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) involves physical and sexual violence and coercive controlling behaviours to maximise power inequality in abusive relationships. Many women make the decision to exit abusive relationships due to the detrimental impact of IPV on their children. In a qualitative exploration, semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 10 women recruited by purposive and snowballing sampling techniques. Two overarching themes of single mothers’ unique experiences of co-parenting with IPV were revealed through interpretative phenomenological analysis. The first theme was Continuous Victimisation, which indicated that post-separation victimisation was an extension of existing IPV whereby fathers used intimidation, threatening behaviours such as stalking and other monitoring tactics and the deliberate undermining of the mother–child relationship. The second theme identified was Systemic Challenges, indicating how court officials applied a ‘pro-contact’ approach and either minimised or denied mothers’ allegations of IPV and the impact on them and the children. The analysis found a persistent bias against mothers . Implications of the study are discussed before the article concludes that attitudinal change regarding IPV is required by decision makers in court processes with a recognition that abusive men may be unwilling to engage in cooperative parenting that focuses on the children’s developmental, social, emotional, psychological and physical needs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Abusive behaviors not connected to child custody disputes per se also occur, commonly within coercive control tactics such as stalking and emotional threats.
“Abusive behaviors not connected to child custody disputes per se also occur, commonly within the realm of coercive control tactics such as stalking and emotional threats (Hardesty & Ganong, 2006; Hay et al., 2021; Spearman et al., 2022).”
From “He Tells People That I Am Going to Kill My Children”: Post-Separation Coercive Control in Men Who Perpetrate IPV (2024) · cites this paper as Hay et al., 2021
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 30
- Authors
- Hay, C., Grobbelaar, M., & Guggisberg, M.
- Affiliations
- Central Queensland University (AU)
- Edith Cowan University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Guggisberg, Marika
- Venue
- Journal of Family Issues
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-11-29
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1276-1300
- ISSN
- 0192-513X (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5481
- OpenAlex
- W3216483084
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Locations
- Journal of Family Issues (publishedVersion)
- Edith Cowan University Research Online (Edith Cowan University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
- Keywords
- intimate partner violence, single mothers, co-parenting, stalking, judicial decision-making, child well-being
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review