Cited by 30Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsStalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment

Mothers’ Post-separation Experiences of Male Partner Abuse: An Exploratory Study

Open access
Hay, Charisse, Grobbelaar, Madalena, Guggisberg, Marika·2023·Journal of Family Issues

Abstract

Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) involves physical and sexual violence and coercive controlling behaviours to maximise power inequality in abusive relationships. Many women make the decision to exit abusive relationships due to the detrimental impact of IPV on their children. In a qualitative exploration, semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 10 women recruited by purposive and snowballing sampling techniques. Two overarching themes of single mothers’ unique experiences of co-parenting with IPV were revealed through interpretative phenomenological analysis. The first theme was Continuous Victimisation, which indicated that post-separation victimisation was an extension of existing IPV whereby fathers used intimidation, threatening behaviours such as stalking and other monitoring tactics and the deliberate undermining of the mother–child relationship. The second theme identified was Systemic Challenges, indicating how court officials applied a ‘pro-contact’ approach and either minimised or denied mothers’ allegations of IPV and the impact on them and the children. The analysis found a persistent bias against mothers . Implications of the study are discussed before the article concludes that attitudinal change regarding IPV is required by decision makers in court processes with a recognition that abusive men may be unwilling to engage in cooperative parenting that focuses on the children’s developmental, social, emotional, psychological and physical needs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0192513x211057541

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Abusive behaviors not connected to child custody disputes per se also occur, commonly within coercive control tactics such as stalking and emotional threats.

    “Abusive behaviors not connected to child custody disputes per se also occur, commonly within the realm of coercive control tactics such as stalking and emotional threats (Hardesty & Ganong, 2006; Hay et al., 2021; Spearman et al., 2022).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 30

Authors
Hay, C., Grobbelaar, M., & Guggisberg, M.
Affiliations
  • Central Queensland University (AU)
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
Corresponding author
Guggisberg, Marika
Venue
Journal of Family Issues
Published
2021-11-29
Volume
44
Issue
5
Pages
1276-1300
ISSN
  • 0192-513X (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5481
OpenAlex
W3216483084
Cited by
30
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Family Issues (publishedVersion)
  • Edith Cowan University Research Online (Edith Cowan University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Keywords
intimate partner violence, single mothers, co-parenting, stalking, judicial decision-making, child well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review