Cited by 55biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesOrthopaedic implants and arthroplastySurgical Sutures and Adhesives

Long-term Local and Systemic Safety of Poly( l -lactide-co-epsilon-caprolactone) after Subcutaneous and Intra-articular Implantation in Rats

Ramot, Yuval, Nyska, Abraham, Markovitz, Elana, Dekel, Assaf, Klaiman, Guy, Zada, Moran Haim, Domb, Abraham J., Maronpot, Robert R.·2015·Toxicologic Pathology

Abstract

The use of biodegradable materials is gaining popularity in medicine, especially in orthopedic applications. However, preclinical evaluation of biodegradable materials can be challenging, since they are located in close contact with host tissues and might be implanted for a long period of time. Evaluation of these compounds requires biodegradability and biocompatibility studies and meticulous pathology examination. We describe 2 preclinical studies performed on Sprague-Dawley rats for 52 weeks, to evaluate clinical pathology, biocompatibility, biodegradability, and systemic toxicity after implantation of 2-layered films or saline-inflated balloon-shaped implants of downsized InSpace™ devices (termed "test device"). The test devices are made from a copolymer of poly-L-lactide-co-∊-caprolactone in a 70:30 ratio, identical to the device used in humans, intended for the treatment of rotator cuff tears. Intra-articular film implantation and subcutaneous implantation of the downsized device showed favorable local and systemic tolerability. Although the implanted materials have no inherent toxic or tumorigenic properties, one animal developed a fibrosarcoma at the implantation site, an event that is associated with a rodent-predilection response where solid materials cause mesenchymal neoplasms. This effect is discussed in the context of biodegradable materials along with a detailed description of expected pathology for biodegradable materials in long-term rodent studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0192623315600275

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Buffer systems, artificial saliva, and selected saliva/serum samples show that PDA-based biosensing platforms can achieve improved biomolecule immobilization, signal transduction, fluorescence/electrochemical/SERS detection, and salivary biomarker analysis.

    “Buffer systems, artificial saliva, and selected saliva/serum samples show improved biomolecule immobilization, signal transduction, fluorescence/electrochemical/SERS detection, and salivary biomarker analysis.”
  • Data from a New Zealand rabbit tibial implantation model demonstrated favorable host responses to PDA-modified titanium alloy screws.

    “With respect to in vivo tissue compatibility, data from a New Zealand rabbit tibial implantation model demonstrated favorable host responses to PDA-modified titanium alloy screws.”
  • Immunohistochemical analysis showed that the expression of inflammatory markers CD68 and CD3 peaked at approximately 2 weeks and subsequently declined, while the macrophage M1/M2 ratio decreased from 2.1 to 0.6.

    “Immunohistochemical analysis showed that the expression of inflammatory markers CD68 and CD3 peaked at approximately 2 weeks and subsequently declined, while the macrophage M1/M2 ratio decreased from 2.1 to 0.6.”
  • Histological analysis at 4, 12, and 26 weeks post-implantation revealed only mild, localized mononuclear cell infiltration on hematoxylin and eosin staining, without the formation of thick fibrous capsules (<50 μm).

    “Histological analysis at 4, 12, and 26 weeks post-implantation revealed only mild, localized mononuclear cell infiltration on hematoxylin and eosin staining, without the formation of thick fibrous capsules (<50 µm).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramot, Y., Nyska, A., Markovitz, E., Dekel, A., Klaiman, G., Zada, M. H., Domb, A. J., & Maronpot, R. R.
Affiliations
  • Hadassah Medical Center (IL)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Ortho-Space Ltd., Caesarea, Israel
  • Harlan Biotech Israel Ltd., Rehovot, Israel
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • Maronpot Consulting LLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
Corresponding author
Nyska, Abraham
Venue
Toxicologic Pathology
Published
2015-08-21
Volume
43
Issue
8
Pages
1127-1140
ISSN
  • 0192-6233 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-1601
OpenAlex
W2147897282
Cited by
55
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Toxicologic Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
Keywords
poly(L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone), biodegradable polymers, biocompatibility, biodegradability, systemic toxicity, subcutaneous implantation, rotator cuff tear, fibrosarcoma, orthopedic implants
MeSH terms
Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Injections, Intra-Articular, Injections, Subcutaneous, Male, Materials Testing, Polyesters, Rotator Cuff, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Prostheses and Implants, Subcutaneous Tissue, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review