Cited by 97Animal testing and alternativesXenotransplantation and immune responseAnimal Genetics and Reproduction

Miniature swine for preclinical modeling of complexities of human disease for translational scientific discovery and accelerated development of therapies and medical devices

Open access
Schomberg, Dominic T., Tellez, Armando, Meudt, Jennifer J., Brady, Dane A., Dillon, Krista N., Arowolo, Folagbayi K., Wicks, Joan, Rousselle, Serge D. +1 more·2016·Toxicologic Pathology

Abstract

Noncommunicable diseases, including cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic respiratory disease, and cancer, are the leading cause of death in the world. The cost, both monetary and time, of developing therapies to prevent, treat, or manage these diseases has become unsustainable. A contributing factor is inefficient and ineffective preclinical research, in which the animal models utilized do not replicate the complex physiology that influences disease. An ideal preclinical animal model is one that responds similarly to intrinsic and extrinsic influences, providing high translatability and concordance of preclinical findings to humans. The overwhelming genetic, anatomical, physiological, and pathophysiological similarities to humans make miniature swine an ideal model for preclinical studies of human disease. Additionally, recent development of precision gene-editing tools for creation of novel genetic swine models allows the modeling of highly complex pathophysiology and comorbidities. As such, the utilization of swine models in early research allows for the evaluation of novel drug and technology efficacy while encouraging redesign and refinement before committing to clinical testing. This review highlights the appropriateness of the miniature swine for modeling complex physiologic systems, presenting it as a highly translational preclinical platform to validate efficacy and safety of therapies and devices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0192623315618292

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 248 · Cited by 97

Authors
Schomberg, D. T., Tellez, A., Meudt, J. J., Brady, D. A., Dillon, K. N., Arowolo, F. K., Wicks, J., Rousselle, S. D., & Shanmuganayagam, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Alizée Pathology, LLC, Thurmont, Maryland, USA
  • Maryland Geological Survey (US)
Corresponding author
Shanmuganayagam, Dhanansayan
Venue
Toxicologic Pathology
Published
2016-02-02
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
299-314
ISSN
  • 0192-6233 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-1601
OpenAlex
W2273083794
Cited by
97
References
248
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
12.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Toxicologic Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Francis Crick Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Xenotransplantation and immune response
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
Keywords
miniature swine, animal models of human disease, translational research, preclinical drug development, medical device development, genome editing, non-communicable diseases, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic respiratory disease, cancer
MeSH terms
Animals, Equipment and Supplies, Humans, Swine, Swine, Miniature, Drug Discovery, Translational Research, Biomedical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review