Miniature swine for preclinical modeling of complexities of human disease for translational scientific discovery and accelerated development of therapies and medical devices
Open accessAbstract
Noncommunicable diseases, including cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic respiratory disease, and cancer, are the leading cause of death in the world. The cost, both monetary and time, of developing therapies to prevent, treat, or manage these diseases has become unsustainable. A contributing factor is inefficient and ineffective preclinical research, in which the animal models utilized do not replicate the complex physiology that influences disease. An ideal preclinical animal model is one that responds similarly to intrinsic and extrinsic influences, providing high translatability and concordance of preclinical findings to humans. The overwhelming genetic, anatomical, physiological, and pathophysiological similarities to humans make miniature swine an ideal model for preclinical studies of human disease. Additionally, recent development of precision gene-editing tools for creation of novel genetic swine models allows the modeling of highly complex pathophysiology and comorbidities. As such, the utilization of swine models in early research allows for the evaluation of novel drug and technology efficacy while encouraging redesign and refinement before committing to clinical testing. This review highlights the appropriateness of the miniature swine for modeling complex physiologic systems, presenting it as a highly translational preclinical platform to validate efficacy and safety of therapies and devices.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Miniature swine varieties more closely mimic human body composition than conventional pigs.
“As conventional pigs have been bred for increased size and muscle mass, miniature varieties more closely mimic human body composition (14, 15).”
From Candida auris Forms High-Burden Biofilms in Skin Niche Conditions and on Porcine Skin (2020) · cites this paper as [14]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 248 · Cited by 97
- Authors
- Schomberg, D. T., Tellez, A., Meudt, J. J., Brady, D. A., Dillon, K. N., Arowolo, F. K., Wicks, J., Rousselle, S. D., & Shanmuganayagam, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Alizée Pathology, LLC, Thurmont, Maryland, USA
- Maryland Geological Survey (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shanmuganayagam, Dhanansayan
- Venue
- Toxicologic Pathology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-02-02
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 299-314
- ISSN
- 0192-6233 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2273083794
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 248
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 12.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Toxicologic Pathology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Francis Crick Institute
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Xenotransplantation and immune response
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
- Keywords
- miniature swine, animal models of human disease, translational research, preclinical drug development, medical device development, genome editing, non-communicable diseases, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic respiratory disease, cancer
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Equipment and Supplies, Humans, Swine, Swine, Miniature, Drug Discovery, Translational Research, Biomedical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review