Cited by 43Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceCrime Patterns and InterventionsPolicing Practices and Perceptions

Developing a Practical Forecasting Screener for Domestic Violence Incidents

Open access
Berk, Richard A., He, Yan, Sorenson, Susan B.·2005·Evaluation Review

Abstract

In this article, the authors report on the development of a short screening tool that deputies in the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department could use in the field to help forecast domestic violence incidents in particular households. The data come from more than 500 households to which sheriff’s deputies were dispatched in fall 2003. Information on potential predictors was collected at the scene. Outcomes were measured during a 3-month follow-up. Data were analyzed with modern data-mining procedures in which true forecasts were evaluated. A screening instrument was developed based on a small fraction of the information collected. Making the screening instrument more complicated did not improve forecasting skill. Taking the relative costs of false positives and false negatives into account, the instrument correctly forecasted future calls for service about 60% of the time. Future calls involving domestic violence misdemeanors and felonies were correctly forecast about 50% of the time. The 50% figure is important because such calls require a law enforcement response and yet are a relatively small fraction of all domestic violence calls for service.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0193841x05275333

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Researchers developed a screener with simple factors for police to forecast domestic violence.

    “Researchers, for example, developed a screener with simple factors for police to forecast domestic violence (65).”

    From Interpretable algorithmic forensics (2023) · cites this paper as [65]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 43

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [1]1. Berk, R.A., Berk, S.F., Newton, P.J. and D.L. Loseke. (1984) "Cops on Call: Summoning the Police to Domestic Violence Incidents," Law and Society Review 18(3):479-498, 1984.
  2. [2]2. Berk, R.A. (2004) "Data Mining with a Regression Framework," UCLA Department of Statistics Preprint Series # 371.
  3. [5]5. Campbell, J.C. et al. (2003) "Risk Factors for Femicide in Abusive Rela- tionships," American Journal of Public Health 93(7), 1089-1097.
  4. [14]14. Sherman, L.W. (1992) Policing Domestic Violence. New York: Free Press.
  5. [15]15. Sherman, L.W. , Smith, D.A., Schmidt, J.D., and D.P. Rogan. (1992) "Crime, Punishment and stakein Conformity: Legal and Informal Con- trol of Domestic Violence," American Sociological Review 57: 680-690.
  6. [16]16. Skogan, W and K. Frydl, eds. (2003) Fairness and Effectiveness in Policing: The Evidence, Washington D.C., The National Academies Press.

Authors
Berk, R. A., He, Y., & Sorenson, S. B.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles
Venue
Evaluation Review
Published
2005-08
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
358-383
ISSN
  • 0145-4692 (ISSN-L)
  • 0193-841X
  • 1552-3926
OpenAlex
W1578230220
Cited by
43
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Evaluation Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
  • ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Department of Statistics, UCLA
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
Keywords
domestic violence, screening tool, law enforcement, sheriff's deputies, calls for service, data mining, false positives and false negatives
MeSH terms
Female, Forecasting, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Research, Los Angeles, Domestic Violence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review