Developing a Practical Forecasting Screener for Domestic Violence Incidents
Open accessAbstract
In this article, the authors report on the development of a short screening tool that deputies in the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department could use in the field to help forecast domestic violence incidents in particular households. The data come from more than 500 households to which sheriff’s deputies were dispatched in fall 2003. Information on potential predictors was collected at the scene. Outcomes were measured during a 3-month follow-up. Data were analyzed with modern data-mining procedures in which true forecasts were evaluated. A screening instrument was developed based on a small fraction of the information collected. Making the screening instrument more complicated did not improve forecasting skill. Taking the relative costs of false positives and false negatives into account, the instrument correctly forecasted future calls for service about 60% of the time. Future calls involving domestic violence misdemeanors and felonies were correctly forecast about 50% of the time. The 50% figure is important because such calls require a law enforcement response and yet are a relatively small fraction of all domestic violence calls for service.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Researchers developed a screener with simple factors for police to forecast domestic violence.
“Researchers, for example, developed a screener with simple factors for police to forecast domestic violence (65).”
From Interpretable algorithmic forensics (2023) · cites this paper as [65]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 43
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- [1]1. Berk, R.A., Berk, S.F., Newton, P.J. and D.L. Loseke. (1984) "Cops on Call: Summoning the Police to Domestic Violence Incidents," Law and Society Review 18(3):479-498, 1984.
- [2]2. Berk, R.A. (2004) "Data Mining with a Regression Framework," UCLA Department of Statistics Preprint Series # 371.
- [5]5. Campbell, J.C. et al. (2003) "Risk Factors for Femicide in Abusive Rela- tionships," American Journal of Public Health 93(7), 1089-1097.
- [14]14. Sherman, L.W. (1992) Policing Domestic Violence. New York: Free Press.
- [15]15. Sherman, L.W. , Smith, D.A., Schmidt, J.D., and D.P. Rogan. (1992) "Crime, Punishment and stakein Conformity: Legal and Informal Con- trol of Domestic Violence," American Sociological Review 57: 680-690.
- [16]16. Skogan, W and K. Frydl, eds. (2003) Fairness and Effectiveness in Policing: The Evidence, Washington D.C., The National Academies Press.
- Authors
- Berk, R. A., He, Y., & Sorenson, S. B.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles
- Venue
- Evaluation Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 358-383
- ISSN
- 0145-4692 (ISSN-L)
- 0193-841X
- 1552-3926
- OpenAlex
- W1578230220
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- repository.upenn.edu
- Locations
- Evaluation Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
- ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Department of Statistics, UCLA
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Keywords
- domestic violence, screening tool, law enforcement, sheriff's deputies, calls for service, data mining, false positives and false negatives
- MeSH terms
- Female, Forecasting, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Research, Los Angeles, Domestic Violence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review