The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Numbers and Words: Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in a Single Large-Scale Evaluation Study
Abstract
This article discusses how quantitative and qualitative methods can be combined in a single evaluation study to better understand the phenomenon in question. Three perspectives on combining methods are reviewed: the purist approach where the two methods are seen as mutually exclusive, the situationalist approach that views them as separate but equal, and the pragmatist approach that suggests integration is possible. From the pragmatist position it is argued that either method can be used at the analysis stage to corroborate (provide convergence in findings), elaborate (provide richness and detail), or initiate (offer new interpretations) findings from the other method. Specific examples of how results from each method can inform the other are offered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103 · cited 1×
“Jick (1979) describes types of triangulation design ranging from simple to complex.”
BackgroundQuantitative Versus Qualitative Research: An Attempt to Clarify the Issue
Smith, J. K. (1983) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x012003006 · Cited by 608
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Abt, W.P., 1980, Reforming Schools: Problems in Program Implementation and Evaluation
- 10.1080/00221546.1982.11780422 · DOI
- Burrell, G., 1979, Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis
- 10.2307/590553 · DOI · Paper page
- Collins, R. (1984) "Statistics versus words," pp. 329-362 in R. Collins (ed.) Sociological Theory, 1984. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. · DOI
- Cook, T. D., 1979, Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research
- Cronbach, L. J., 1969, Research for Tomorrow's Schools: Disciplined Inquiry for Education
- 10.5465/amr.1983.4284649 · DOI · Paper page
- Denzin, N.K., 1970, The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods
- Firestone, W.A., 1980, Great Expectations for Small Schools: The Limitations of Federal Projects
- B.L. Wilson, 1983, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 4, 429, 10.1177/107554708300400305 · DOI
- Firestone, W.A., 1983, The Study of Regional Educational Service Agencies: Summary of Findings
- 10.1525/aeq.1981.12.2.05x1889q · DOI
- Herriott, R.E., 1980, Federal Intitiatives and Rural School Improvement: Findings from the Experimental Schools Program
- Ianni, F.A.J. and M.T. Orr (1979) "Toward a rapproachement of quantitative and qualitative methodologies," pp. 87-97 in T. D. Cook and C. S. Reichardt (eds.) Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Kimberly, J.R., F. Norling, and J.A. Weiss (1983) "Pondering the performance puzzle: Effectiveness in interorganizational settings," pp. 249-264 in R. H. Hall and R. E. Quinn (eds.) Organizational Theory and Public Policy. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- 10.3102/01623737004002223 · DOI
- Miles, M.B., 1984, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Source-book of New Methods
- 10.1017/CBO9780511607776 · DOI · Paper page
- Reichardt, C.S. and T.D. Cook (1979) "Beyond qualitative versus quantitative methods ," pp. 7-32 in T. D. Cook and C. S. Reichardt (eds.) Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- 10.1525/aeq.1977.8.2.05x1394p · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4613-3234-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.17730/humo.40.4.k75rr5488r281t58 · DOI
- 10.3102/0013189X010006005 · DOI
- 10.1086/225467 · DOI · Paper page
- 1982, Amer. Behavioral Scientist, 26, 1
- Trend, M.G. (1979) "On the reconciliation of qualitative and quantitative analyses: a case study," pp. 68-86 in T. D. Cook and C. S. Reichardt (eds.) Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- 10.17730/humo.16.3.cx277m417x00w647 · DOI
- 10.2307/2088196 · DOI
- 10.1086/223194 · DOI
Cited by
Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method
Bowen, G. A. (2009) · Qualitative Research Journal · doi:10.3316/qrj0902027 · Cited by 13,013
Toward a definition of mixed methods research
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/1558689806298224 · Cited by 6,464
Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/01623737011003255 · Cited by 5,687
Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design: From Theory to Practice
Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006) · Field Methods · doi:10.1177/1525822x05282260 · Cited by 3,167
Morgan, D. L. (1998) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/104973239800800307 · Cited by 1,374
Metadata
- Authors
- Rossman, G. B., & Wilson, B. L.
- Venue
- Evaluation Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1985-10
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 627-643
- ISSN
- 0145-4692 (ISSN-L)
- 0193-841X
- 1552-3926
- OpenAlex
- W1968742528
- Cited by
- 813
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
