Nurses’ Information Management and Use of Electronic Tools During Acute Care Handoffs
Abstract
Little evidence is available about nurses' use of electronic tools during handoffs. This qualitative study explored information management and use of electronic tools during nursing handoffs. The sample included 93 handoffs by 26 nurses on 5 medical/surgical units in 2 western hospitals with a robust electronic health record (EHR). Data collection included audiotaping handoffs, semi-structured interviews, observations, and fieldnotes. The dataset was inductively coded into 33 categories and 5 themes: good nurse expectations for handoffs, paper forms are best, information at a glance, only pertinent information please, and information tools that work. Two-thirds of the nurses abandoned use of the leadership-endorsed electronic handoff form, preferring personal paper forms. The findings suggest effective electronic solutions will require extensive contextually-based information, information integrated across EHR modules and portable, electronic support throughout shifts. This is a call to action for leaders and informaticists as they select and design future electronic tools.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nurses made little use of EHR handoff support due to these limitations.
“They subsequently found that nurses made little use of EHR handoff support due to these limitations.32”
From Potential uses of AI for perioperative nursing handoffs: a qualitative study (2023) · cites this paper as [32]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Potential uses of AI for perioperative nursing handoffs: a qualitative study
King, C. R., Shambe, A., & Abraham, J. (2023) · JAMIA Open · doi:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad015 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“32 Calculations and displays of EHR data can be viewed as sense-making, with tension between different purposes and users.”
BackgroundElectronic health record tools’ support of nurses’ clinical judgment and team communication
KOSSMAN, S. P., BONNEY, L. A., & KIM, M. J. (2013) · CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing · doi:10.1097/01.ncn.0000432122.79452.7b · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Staggers, N., Clark, L., Blaz, J. W., & Kapsandoy, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, Salt Lake City, UT
- University of Utah (US)
- Venue
- Western Journal of Nursing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-05-03
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 153-173
- ISSN
- 0193-9459 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8456
- OpenAlex
- W2100410745
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Western Journal of Nursing Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Keywords
- nursing handover, electronic health records, information management, paper forms, shift handover, clinical information needs, medical-surgical units
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attitude to Computers, Continuity of Patient Care, Female, Forms and Records Control, Humans, Male, Nursing Staff, Hospital, United States, Qualitative Research, Practice Patterns, Nurses', Electronic Health Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review