Cited by 43Hospital Admissions and OutcomesNursing Diagnosis and DocumentationElectronic Health Records Systems

Nurses’ Information Management and Use of Electronic Tools During Acute Care Handoffs

Staggers, Nancy, Clark, Lauren, Blaz, Jacquelyn W., Kapsandoy, Seraphine·2012·Western Journal of Nursing Research

Abstract

Little evidence is available about nurses' use of electronic tools during handoffs. This qualitative study explored information management and use of electronic tools during nursing handoffs. The sample included 93 handoffs by 26 nurses on 5 medical/surgical units in 2 western hospitals with a robust electronic health record (EHR). Data collection included audiotaping handoffs, semi-structured interviews, observations, and fieldnotes. The dataset was inductively coded into 33 categories and 5 themes: good nurse expectations for handoffs, paper forms are best, information at a glance, only pertinent information please, and information tools that work. Two-thirds of the nurses abandoned use of the leadership-endorsed electronic handoff form, preferring personal paper forms. The findings suggest effective electronic solutions will require extensive contextually-based information, information integrated across EHR modules and portable, electronic support throughout shifts. This is a call to action for leaders and informaticists as they select and design future electronic tools.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0193945911407089

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Staggers, N., Clark, L., Blaz, J. W., & Kapsandoy, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, Salt Lake City, UT
  • University of Utah (US)
Venue
Western Journal of Nursing Research
Published
2011-05-03
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
153-173
ISSN
  • 0193-9459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8456
OpenAlex
W2100410745
Cited by
43
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Western Journal of Nursing Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
nursing handover, electronic health records, information management, paper forms, shift handover, clinical information needs, medical-surgical units
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Computers, Continuity of Patient Care, Female, Forms and Records Control, Humans, Male, Nursing Staff, Hospital, United States, Qualitative Research, Practice Patterns, Nurses', Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review