Cited by 36Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesSinusitis and nasal conditions

Effects of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery and Nasal Surgery in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Yalamanchali, Sreeya, Cipta, Stephanie, Waxman, Jonathan, Pott, Thomas, Joseph, Ninos, Friedman, Michael·2014·Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of combined nasal surgery and endoscopic sinus surgery on the objective measurements of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and sleep architecture by comparing polysomnographic data before and after combined surgery in patients with OSA. STUDY DESIGN: Case series with chart review. SETTING: A single clinical site. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients with OSA and chronic rhinosinusitis who underwent combined nasal surgery and endoscopic sinus surgery and preoperative and postoperative polysomnography were identified. Patient charts were reviewed and preoperative and postoperative body mass index, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), mean and minimum oxygen saturation, sleep efficiency, and sleep staging were compared. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were included in our study. Patients were divided into 3 groups on the basis of the severity of OSA: those with mild OSA (n = 9), those with moderate OSA (n = 23), and those with severe OSA (n = 24). After combined nasal and sinus surgery, the mean AHI significantly decreased from 33.5 ± 22.0 to 29.4 ± 20.8 (P = .009) in our overall population. Specifically, AHI improved significantly in patients with moderate OSA (from 22.3 ± 4.8 to 20.7 ± 8.2, P = .023) and severe OSA (from 52.3 ± 21.4 to 43.6 ± 23.9, P = .034), while patients with mild OSA did not have significant changes in AHI. Successful surgical procedures were achieved in only 2 of 56 patients. CONCLUSION: Although combined nasal and sinus surgery may slightly improve AHI in a certain group of patients, it does not cure OSA or have a significant clinical impact.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0194599814528296

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 36

Authors
Yalamanchali, S., Cipta, S., Waxman, J., Pott, T., Joseph, N., & Friedman, M.
Affiliations
  • Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Friedman, Michael
Venue
Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-03-31
Volume
151
Issue
1
Pages
171-175
ISSN
  • 0161-6439 (ISSN-L)
  • 0194-5998
  • 1097-6817
OpenAlex
W2090985093
Cited by
36
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Otolaryngology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, endoscopic sinus surgery, nasal surgery, chronic rhinosinusitis, apnea-hypopnea index, sleep architecture, polysomnography, surgical outcomes, OSA severity
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nose, Postoperative Care, Preoperative Care, Retrospective Studies, Rhinitis, Severity of Illness Index, Sinusitis, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome, Polysomnography, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review