Effects of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery and Nasal Surgery in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of combined nasal surgery and endoscopic sinus surgery on the objective measurements of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and sleep architecture by comparing polysomnographic data before and after combined surgery in patients with OSA. STUDY DESIGN: Case series with chart review. SETTING: A single clinical site. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients with OSA and chronic rhinosinusitis who underwent combined nasal surgery and endoscopic sinus surgery and preoperative and postoperative polysomnography were identified. Patient charts were reviewed and preoperative and postoperative body mass index, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), mean and minimum oxygen saturation, sleep efficiency, and sleep staging were compared. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were included in our study. Patients were divided into 3 groups on the basis of the severity of OSA: those with mild OSA (n = 9), those with moderate OSA (n = 23), and those with severe OSA (n = 24). After combined nasal and sinus surgery, the mean AHI significantly decreased from 33.5 ± 22.0 to 29.4 ± 20.8 (P = .009) in our overall population. Specifically, AHI improved significantly in patients with moderate OSA (from 22.3 ± 4.8 to 20.7 ± 8.2, P = .023) and severe OSA (from 52.3 ± 21.4 to 43.6 ± 23.9, P = .034), while patients with mild OSA did not have significant changes in AHI. Successful surgical procedures were achieved in only 2 of 56 patients. CONCLUSION: Although combined nasal and sinus surgery may slightly improve AHI in a certain group of patients, it does not cure OSA or have a significant clinical impact.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some studies reported on possible confounders; only three studies adjusted statistically for their impact.
“Some studies reported on possible confounders; only three studies adjusted statistically for their impact [12,15,19].”
From The Role of Isolated Nasal Surgery in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Therapy—A Systematic Review (2022) · cites this paper as [12]
In the remaining eight studies, the overall AHI decreased significantly after nasal surgery.
“In the remaining eight studies, the overall AHI decreased significantly after nasal surgery [12,13,19,20,26,27,31,32].”
From The Role of Isolated Nasal Surgery in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Therapy—A Systematic Review (2022) · cites this paper as [12]
In thirteen studies, it was not reported if patients used CPAP during the study period.
“In thirteen studies, it was not reported if patients used CPAP during the study period [12,13,14,15,16,19,20,23,24,26,27,29,32].”
From The Role of Isolated Nasal Surgery in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Therapy—A Systematic Review (2022) · cites this paper as [12]
In one study, only 56 out of 156 eligible patients were included because there was no postoperative PSG, making this study susceptible to selection bias.
“In one study, only 56 out of 156 eligible patients were included because there was no postoperative PSG, making this study susceptible to selection bias [12].”
From The Role of Isolated Nasal Surgery in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Therapy—A Systematic Review (2022) · cites this paper as [12]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 36
- Authors
- Yalamanchali, S., Cipta, S., Waxman, J., Pott, T., Joseph, N., & Friedman, M.
- Affiliations
- Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center (US)
- Rush University Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Friedman, Michael
- Venue
- Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-03-31
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 171-175
- ISSN
- 0161-6439 (ISSN-L)
- 0194-5998
- 1097-6817
- OpenAlex
- W2090985093
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 3.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Otolaryngology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
- Keywords
- obstructive sleep apnea, endoscopic sinus surgery, nasal surgery, chronic rhinosinusitis, apnea-hypopnea index, sleep architecture, polysomnography, surgical outcomes, OSA severity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nose, Postoperative Care, Preoperative Care, Retrospective Studies, Rhinitis, Severity of Illness Index, Sinusitis, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome, Polysomnography, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review