The DOI matches its Crossref record; 247 of the 250 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical Practice Guideline: Tinnitus
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Tinnitus is the perception of sound without an external source. More than 50 million people in the United States have reported experiencing tinnitus, resulting in an estimated prevalence of 10% to 15% in adults. Despite the high prevalence of tinnitus and its potential significant effect on quality of life, there are no evidence-based, multidisciplinary clinical practice guidelines to assist clinicians with management. The focus of this guideline is on tinnitus that is both bothersome and persistent (lasting 6 months or longer), which often negatively affects the patient's quality of life. The target audience for the guideline is any clinician, including nonphysicians, involved in managing patients with tinnitus. The target patient population is limited to adults (18 years and older) with primary tinnitus that is persistent and bothersome. PURPOSE: The purpose of this guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations for clinicians managing patients with tinnitus. This guideline provides clinicians with a logical framework to improve patient care and mitigate the personal and social effects of persistent, bothersome tinnitus. It will discuss the evaluation of patients with tinnitus, including selection and timing of diagnostic testing and specialty referral to identify potential underlying treatable pathology. It will then focus on the evaluation and treatment of patients with persistent primary tinnitus, with recommendations to guide the evaluation and measurement of the effect of tinnitus and to determine the most appropriate interventions to improve symptoms and quality of life for tinnitus sufferers. ACTION STATEMENTS: The development group made a strong recommendation that clinicians distinguish patients with bothersome tinnitus from patients with nonbothersome tinnitus. The development group made a strong recommendation against obtaining imaging studies of the head and neck in patients with tinnitus, specifically to evaluate tinnitus that does not localize to 1 ear, is nonpulsatile, and is not associated with focal neurologic abnormalities or an asymmetric hearing loss. The panel made the following recommendations: Clinicians should (a) perform a targeted history and physical examination at the initial evaluation of a patient with presumed primary tinnitus to identify conditions that if promptly identified and managed may relieve tinnitus; (b) obtain a prompt, comprehensive audiologic examination in patients with tinnitus that is unilateral, persistent (≥ 6 months), or associated with hearing difficulties; (c) distinguish patients with bothersome tinnitus of recent onset from those with persistent symptoms (≥ 6 months) to prioritize intervention and facilitate discussions about natural history and follow-up care; (d) educate patients with persistent, bothersome tinnitus about management strategies; (e) recommend a hearing aid evaluation for patients who have persistent, bothersome tinnitus associated with documented hearing loss; and (f) recommend cognitive behavioral therapy to patients with persistent, bothersome tinnitus. The panel recommended against (a) antidepressants, anticonvulsants, anxiolytics, or intratympanic medications for the routine treatment of patients with persistent, bothersome tinnitus; (b) Ginkgo biloba, melatonin, zinc, or other dietary supplements for treating patients with persistent, bothersome tinnitus; and (c) transcranial magnetic stimulation for the routine treatment of patients with persistent, bothersome tinnitus. The development group provided the following options: Clinicians may (a) obtain an initial comprehensive audiologic examination in patients who present with tinnitus (regardless of laterality, duration, or perceived hearing status); and (b) recommend sound therapy to patients with persistent, bothersome tinnitus. The development group provided no recommendation regarding the effect of acupuncture in patients with persistent, bothersome tinnitus.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Currently, CBT is the only intervention strongly recommended in clinical practice guidelines for tinnitus (Tunkel et al., 2014; Cima et al., 2019; Ogawa et al., 2020)”
From Research trends and hotspots of cognitive behavioral therapy for tinnitus: a bibliometric analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Tunkel et al., 2014
In the citing paper
“The American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery guidelines recommended that ACT was an effective treatment for patients with persistent and bothersome tinnitus [5].”
From Validation of the Tinnitus Acceptance Questionnaire: Japanese Version (2022) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“The American Academy of Otolaryngology evidence-based guidelines for tinnitus management recommend the use of CBT (Tunkel et al. 2014).”
From Psychological Therapy for People with Tinnitus: A Scoping Review of Treatment Components. (2017) · cites this paper as Tunkel et al. 2014
Citations
Cites
McKhann, G. M., Knopman, D. S., Chertkow, H., Hyman, B. T., Jack, C. R., Kawas, C. H., Klunk, W. E., Koroshetz, W. J., Manly, J. J., Mayeux, R., et al. (2011) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005 · Cited by 18,657
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
Jadad, A. R., Moore, R. A., Carroll, D., Jenkinson, C., Reynolds, D. J. M., Gavaghan, D. J., & McQuay, H. J. (1996) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4 · Cited by 17,582
Albert, M. S., DeKosky, S. T., Dickson, D., Dubois, B., Feldman, H. H., Fox, N. C., Gamst, A., Holtzman, D. M., Jagust, W. J., Petersen, R. C., et al. (2011) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008 · Cited by 10,152 · cited 2×
“Studies of the clock drawing test have shown a mean sensitivity (85%) and specificity (85%) for the diagnosis of dementia.(64) Multiple scoring guidelines have been used to judge the clock as either “normal” or “abnormal” and thus determine whether the patient passes this screen for dementia.”
NON-INVASIVE MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX
Barker, A. T., Jalinous, R., & Freeston, I. L. (1985) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92413-4 · Cited by 4,466
Albert, M., DeKosky, S. T., Dickson, D. W., Dubois, B., Feldman, H., Fox, N. C., Gamst, A. C., Holtzman, D. M., Jagust, W. J., Petersen, R. C., et al. (2013) · FOCUS The Journal of Lifelong Learning in Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.focus.11.1.96 · Cited by 2,643
American Speech‐Language‐Hearing Association
Weiner, F. F., & Ketzenberger, K. E. (2008) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470373699.speced0119 · Cited by 2,552
Development of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory.
Newman, C., Jacobson, G., & Spitzer, J. (1996) · Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · doi:10.1001/archotol.1996.01890140029007 · Cited by 2,140
Self-citationCurrent estimates from the National Health Interview Survey.
Ss, J. (1981) · PubMed · Cited by 1,866
Katayama, H., Yamaguchi, K., Kozuka, T., Takashima, T., Seez, P., & Matsuura, K. (1990) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.175.3.2343107 · Cited by 1,471
Clock-drawing: is it the ideal cognitive screening test?
Shulman, K. I. (2000) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/1099-1166(200006)15:6 · Cited by 1,354
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- US Department of Veterans Affairs, ed, 2013, Annual Benefits Report: Fiscal Year 2012
- Deshaies P, 2011, Environmental Noise and Tinnitus, 71
- Stouffer JL, 1991, Tinnitus as a function of duration and etiology: counseling implications, Am J Otol, 12, 188
- Pichora‐Fuller MK, 2013, Evaluation and treatment of tinnitus: comparative effectiveness
- Oxford Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine.OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group. The Oxford 2011 levels of evidence.http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653. Published2011.
- Mainland BJ, Multiple clock drawing scoring systems: simpler is better [published online June 13, 2013], Int J Geriatr Psychiatry
- 10.1177/0194599812436449 · DOI · Paper page
- National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement on Acoustic Neuroma, 1994, The Consensus Development Panel, Arch Neurol, 51, 201
- Dobie RA, 2004, Tinnitus: Theory and Management, 1
- Davis A, 2000, Tinnitus, 1
- Newman CW, 2004, Tinnitus: Theory and Management, 237
- Zaugg TL, 2002, Proceedings of the Seventh International Tinnitus Seminar, 226
- Rosenblum J, 2012, Neuroimaging of Common Neurologic Conditions in Practical Neurology, 333
- Malouff J, 2008, Self‐help books for tinnitus‐related distress: do they really help?, Tinnitus Today
- Tyler RS, 2008, The Consumer Handbook on Tinnitus
- Henry JA, 2010, How to Manage Your Tinnitus: A Step‐by‐Step Workbook
- Davis PB, 1995, Living with Tinnitus
- Kochkin S, 2008, Tinnitus treatment and the effectiveness of hearing aids: hearing care professional perceptions, Hear Rev, 15, 14
- Vernon J, 1977, Attempts to relieve tinnitus, J Am Audiol Soc, 2, 124
- Vernon JA, 2000, Tinnitus Handbook, 313
- Jastreboff PJ, 2004, Tinnitus: Theory and Management, 310
- Hallam RS, 2006, Tinnitus Treatment, 65
- Davis P, 2006, Tinnitus Treatment: Clinical Protocols, 146
- Davis PB, 1998, Music as Therapy in the Rehabilitation of Tinnitus Sufferers: Effects of Spectral Modification and Counseling
- Davis PB, 1996, Proceedings of the Fifth International Tinnitus Seminar, 305
- Davis PB, 2001, Relative effects of acoustic stimulation and counseling in the tinnitus rehabilitation process, Aust New Zeal J Audiol, 23, 84
- Davis P, 1999, Proceedings of the Sixth International Tinnitus Seminar, 394
- 10.1097/00006842-200209000-00014 · DOI · Paper page
- Savage J, 2009, Tinnitus [published online November 12, 2009], Clin Evid (Online), 2009, 0506
- Coles RRA, 1992, Proceedings of Fourth International Tinnitus Seminar, 453
- Jiang B, 2010, Acupuncture treatment for senile of tinnitus of 30 cases [in Chinese], Jiangsu J TCM, 42, 52
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Clinical Practice Guideline: Sudden Hearing Loss (Update)
Chandrasekhar, S. S., Tsai Do, B. S., Schwartz, S. R., Bontempo, L. J., Faucett, E. A., Finestone, S. A., Hollingsworth, D. B., Kelley, D. M., Kmucha, S. T., Moonis, G., et al. (2019) · Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery · doi:10.1177/0194599819859885 · Cited by 931
Self-citationMaladaptive plasticity in tinnitus — triggers, mechanisms and treatment
Shore, S. E., Roberts, L. E., & Langguth, B. (2016) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2016.12 · Cited by 469
Prevalence, Severity, Exposures, and Treatment Patterns of Tinnitus in the United States
Bhatt, J. M., Lin, H. W., & Bhattacharyya, N. (2016) · JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2016.1700 · Cited by 460
A multidisciplinary European guideline for tinnitus: diagnostics, assessment, and treatment
Cima, R. F. F., Mazurek, B., Haider, H., Kikidis, D., Lapira, A., Noreña, A., & Hoare, D. J. (2019) · HNO · doi:10.1007/s00106-019-0633-7 · Cited by 442
Carlson, M. L., & Link, M. J. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra2020394 · Cited by 376
Metadata
- Authors
- Tunkel, D. E., Bauer, C. A., Sun, G. H., Rosenfeld, R. M., Chandrasekhar, S. S., Cunningham, E. R., Archer, S. M., Blakley, B. W., Carter, J. M., Granieri, E. C., Henry, J. A., Hollingsworth, D., Khan, F. A., Mitchell, S., Monfared, A., Newman, C. W., Omole, F. S., Phillips, C. D., Robinson, S. K., Taw, M. B., Tyler, R. S., Waguespack, R., & Whamond, E. J.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- SIU Medicine (US)
- Partnership for Health Analytic Research (US)
- SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University (US)
- New York Otology New York New York USA
- American Academy of Otolaryngology — Head and Neck Surgery (US)
- University of Kentucky (US)
- University of Manitoba (CA)
- Tulane University (US)
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
- Portland VA Medical Center (US)
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- Ochsner Health System (US)
- Houston Christian University (US)
- George Washington University (US)
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine (US)
- Morehouse School of Medicine (US)
- NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- University of Iowa (US)
- University of Alabama (US)
- Consumers United for Evidence‐Based Healthcare Fredericton New Brunswick Canada
- ORCID
- Venue
- Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- S2
- Pages
- S1-S40
- ISSN
- 0161-6439 (ISSN-L)
- 0194-5998
- 1097-6817
- OpenAlex
- W2118772689
- Cited by
- 769
- References
- 250
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 87 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 24.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Otolaryngology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Acoustics and Ultrasonics › Noise Effects and Management
- Keywords
- tinnitus, tinnitus management, tinnitus evaluation, hearing loss, hearing aids, cognitive behavioral therapy, tinnitus retraining therapy, tinnitus masking
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Humans, Tinnitus, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review