Absence of widespread psychosocial and cognitive effects of school-based music instruction in 10–13-year-old students
Abstract
Previous studies demonstrate that private music training has benefits which may transfer to other domains, including verbal memory, intelligence and self-esteem. The current paper reports on the impact of an increase in school-based music training on a range of cognitive and psychosocial measures for 10–13-year-olds in two independent studies. In the first study, the benefits of increased frequency of classroom-based music classes were compared with classroom-based drama and art lessons in secondary school students ( N = 127). The second study compared the effects of introducing a new classroom-based music programme with a new drama programme for primary school students ( N = 100). Assessments were obtained at baseline and approximately six months after implementation of each programme. In contrast to previous research on the effects of private music tuition, no convincing benefits of school music classes were apparent. Trends of interest were observed in non-verbal intelligence, aggression scores and verbal memory, which require further investigation. The findings suggest that the benefits of music instruction previously reported may be limited to private or externally-based music tuition, or socio-economically disadvantaged schools. The intrinsic value of music education for enjoyment and learning should therefore remain central to the justification of music education in the national school curriculum.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some effect sizes in previous meta-analyses were incorrectly calculated because of a mistake in the reporting of results in Rickard et al. (2012).
“Also, some of the effect sizes were incorrectly calculated because of a mistake in the reporting of the results in one of the primary studies (Rickard et al., 2012; personal communication).”
From Cognitive and academic benefits of music training with children: A multilevel meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Rickard et al., 2012
Cites
Anvari, S. H., Trainor, L. J., Woodside, J., & Levy, B. A. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-0965(02)00124-8 · Cited by 670 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cognitive and academic benefits of music training with children: A multilevel meta-analysis
Sala, G., & Gobet, F. (2020) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-020-01060-2 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
What does It take to Show that a Cognitive Training Procedure is Useful?
Jacoby, N., & Ahissar, M. (2013) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-63327-9.00004-7 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rickard, N. S., Bambrick, C. J., & Gill, A.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Venue
- International Journal of Music Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-78
- ISSN
- 0255-7614 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-795X
- OpenAlex
- W2044659228
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 112.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Music Education (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
- Social Sciences › Education › Music Education and Analysis
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Keywords
- music education, cognitive effects, psychosocial impact, nonverbal intelligence, verbal memory, aggression, drama in education, art education, elementary school students, high school students, music curriculum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review