Cited by 130Diverse Music Education InsightsMusic Education and AnalysisNeuroscience and Music Perception

Absence of widespread psychosocial and cognitive effects of school-based music instruction in 10–13-year-old students

Rickard, Nikki S., Bambrick, Caroline J., Gill, Anneliese·2012·International Journal of Music Education

Abstract

Previous studies demonstrate that private music training has benefits which may transfer to other domains, including verbal memory, intelligence and self-esteem. The current paper reports on the impact of an increase in school-based music training on a range of cognitive and psychosocial measures for 10–13-year-olds in two independent studies. In the first study, the benefits of increased frequency of classroom-based music classes were compared with classroom-based drama and art lessons in secondary school students ( N = 127). The second study compared the effects of introducing a new classroom-based music programme with a new drama programme for primary school students ( N = 100). Assessments were obtained at baseline and approximately six months after implementation of each programme. In contrast to previous research on the effects of private music tuition, no convincing benefits of school music classes were apparent. Trends of interest were observed in non-verbal intelligence, aggression scores and verbal memory, which require further investigation. The findings suggest that the benefits of music instruction previously reported may be limited to private or externally-based music tuition, or socio-economically disadvantaged schools. The intrinsic value of music education for enjoyment and learning should therefore remain central to the justification of music education in the national school curriculum.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0255761411431399

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some effect sizes in previous meta-analyses were incorrectly calculated because of a mistake in the reporting of results in Rickard et al. (2012).

    “Also, some of the effect sizes were incorrectly calculated because of a mistake in the reporting of the results in one of the primary studies (Rickard et al., 2012; personal communication).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rickard, N. S., Bambrick, C. J., & Gill, A.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Venue
International Journal of Music Education
Published
2012-02
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
57-78
ISSN
  • 0255-7614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-795X
OpenAlex
W2044659228
Cited by
130
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
112.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Music Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
  • Social Sciences › Education › Music Education and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
music education, cognitive effects, psychosocial impact, nonverbal intelligence, verbal memory, aggression, drama in education, art education, elementary school students, high school students, music curriculum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review