Cited by 76Diverse Music Education InsightsNeuroscience and Music PerceptionMusic Therapy and Health

It’s all in your head: A meta-analysis on the effects of music training on cognitive measures in schoolchildren

Cooper, Patrick K·2020·International Journal of Music Education

Abstract

The utility of music training in schools has received much attention in the United States. The purported positive cognitive benefits of music training for schoolchildren is one facet which has historically been used to advocate for the existence of public school music programs. The purpose of this study was to conduct a random-effects meta-analysis to measure the overall mean effects of music training on cognitive measures in schoolchildren. Results showed small to medium overall effects ( N = 5,612, k = 100, g = .28, p < .001, 95% confidence interval [CI] [.21, .34]). When compared to active control groups, music training yielded more improvement on a range of cognitive measurements ( g = .21, p < .0001). While some studies did result in large effect sizes, significant moderators related to methodological quality rendered the overall findings non-significant ( g = .08, p = .19, 95% CI [–.04, .20]). Additional moderator analysis showed no clear advantage in one area of cognitive function. Results did not differ by geographical locale or type of music intervention. Overall, results suggested music training may be a positive cognitive intervention for schoolchildren; however, advantages as to the utility of music training compared to other cognitive interventions were less empirically supported.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0255761419881495

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cooper (2019) analysed 21 studies (n = 1,767) and found an overall effect size of g = 0.28 across several measures of cognitive ability; the effect was maintained in studies employing active controls (g = 0.21).

    “Analogously, Cooper (2019) analysed 21 studies (n = 1,767) and found an overall effect size of g¯ = 0.28 across several measures of cognitive ability (measures related to academic achievement were not included because they were considered too different from cognitive ability). Interestingly, the effect was maintained in studies employing active controls (g¯ = 0.21).”
  • There was no difference between cognitive skills and academic achievement (literacy and mathematics).

    “there was no difference between cognitive skills and academic achievement (literacy and mathematics)”
  • A non-negligible amount of unexplained true heterogeneity makes overall effect sizes hard to interpret because the sources of between-study variability remain hidden.

    “In addition, the presence of a non-negligible amount of unexplained true heterogeneity (as in both Sala & Gobet, 2017b, and Cooper, 2019) makes the overall effect sizes hard to interpret because the sources of between-study variability remain hidden.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cooper, P. K.
Affiliations
University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Cooper, Patrick K
Venue
International Journal of Music Education
Published
2019-10-15
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
321-336
ISSN
  • 0255-7614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-795X
OpenAlex
W2980397379
Cited by
76
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4
FWCI
48.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Music Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Music Therapy and Health
Keywords
musical training, cognitive benefits, elementary school students, music education, cognitive intervention, methodological quality, active control groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review