It’s all in your head: A meta-analysis on the effects of music training on cognitive measures in schoolchildren
Abstract
The utility of music training in schools has received much attention in the United States. The purported positive cognitive benefits of music training for schoolchildren is one facet which has historically been used to advocate for the existence of public school music programs. The purpose of this study was to conduct a random-effects meta-analysis to measure the overall mean effects of music training on cognitive measures in schoolchildren. Results showed small to medium overall effects ( N = 5,612, k = 100, g = .28, p < .001, 95% confidence interval [CI] [.21, .34]). When compared to active control groups, music training yielded more improvement on a range of cognitive measurements ( g = .21, p < .0001). While some studies did result in large effect sizes, significant moderators related to methodological quality rendered the overall findings non-significant ( g = .08, p = .19, 95% CI [–.04, .20]). Additional moderator analysis showed no clear advantage in one area of cognitive function. Results did not differ by geographical locale or type of music intervention. Overall, results suggested music training may be a positive cognitive intervention for schoolchildren; however, advantages as to the utility of music training compared to other cognitive interventions were less empirically supported.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cooper (2019) analysed 21 studies (n = 1,767) and found an overall effect size of g = 0.28 across several measures of cognitive ability; the effect was maintained in studies employing active controls (g = 0.21).
“Analogously, Cooper (2019) analysed 21 studies (n = 1,767) and found an overall effect size of g¯ = 0.28 across several measures of cognitive ability (measures related to academic achievement were not included because they were considered too different from cognitive ability). Interestingly, the effect was maintained in studies employing active controls (g¯ = 0.21).”
From Cognitive and academic benefits of music training with children: A multilevel meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Cooper (2019)
There was no difference between cognitive skills and academic achievement (literacy and mathematics).
“there was no difference between cognitive skills and academic achievement (literacy and mathematics)”
From Cognitive and academic benefits of music training with children: A multilevel meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Cooper’s (2019)
A non-negligible amount of unexplained true heterogeneity makes overall effect sizes hard to interpret because the sources of between-study variability remain hidden.
“In addition, the presence of a non-negligible amount of unexplained true heterogeneity (as in both Sala & Gobet, 2017b, and Cooper, 2019) makes the overall effect sizes hard to interpret because the sources of between-study variability remain hidden.”
From Cognitive and academic benefits of music training with children: A multilevel meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Cooper, 2019
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cognitive and academic benefits of music training with children: A multilevel meta-analysis
Sala, G., & Gobet, F. (2020) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-020-01060-2 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Román-Caballero, R., Vadillo, M. A., Trainor, L. J., & Lupiáñez, J. (2022) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100436 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cooper, P. K.
- Affiliations
- University of South Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cooper, Patrick K
- ORCID
- Cooper, Patrick K
- Venue
- International Journal of Music Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-10-15
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 321-336
- ISSN
- 0255-7614 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-795X
- OpenAlex
- W2980397379
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 48.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Music Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Music Therapy and Health
- Keywords
- musical training, cognitive benefits, elementary school students, music education, cognitive intervention, methodological quality, active control groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review