Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 31

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of 12 months of creatine supplementation and whole-body resistance training on measures of bone, muscle and strength in older males

Candow, Darren G, Chilibeck, Philip D, Gordon, Julianne, Vogt, Emelie, Landeryou, Tim, Kaviani, Mojtaba, Paus-Jensen, Lisa·2021·Nutrition and Health

Abstract

Background: The combination of creatine supplementation and resistance training (10–12 weeks) has been shown to increase bone mineral content and reduce a urinary indicator of bone resorption in older males compared with placebo. However, the longer-term effects (12 months) of creatine and resistance training on bone mineral density and bone geometric properties in older males is unknown. Aim: To assess the effects of 12 months of creatine supplementation and supervised, whole-body resistance training on bone mineral density, bone geometric properties, muscle accretion, and strength in older males. Methods: Participants were randomized to supplement with creatine ( n = 18, 49–69 years, 0.1 g·kg -1 ·d -1 ) or placebo ( n = 20, 49–67 years, 0.1 g·kg -1 ·d -1 ) during 12 months of supervised, whole-body resistance training. Results: After 12 months of training, both groups experienced similar changes in bone mineral density and geometry, bone speed of sound, lean tissue and fat mass, muscle thickness, and muscle strength. There was a trend ( p = 0.061) for creatine to increase the section modulus of the narrow part of the femoral neck, an indicator of bone bending strength, compared with placebo. Adverse events did not differ between creatine and placebo. Conclusions: Twelve months of creatine supplementation and supervised, whole-body resistance training had no greater effect on measures of bone, muscle, or strength in older males compared with placebo.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0260106020975247

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. 10.1007/s12020-013-0070-4 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.exger.2019.01.025 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000571 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Chilibeck PD, 2005, Journal of Nutrition Health and Aging, 9, 352
  5. 10.1139/y02-126 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/jbmr.1815 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s00198-019-05080-w · DOI
  8. 10.22203/eCM.v010a02 · DOI
  9. Johnell O, 2004, Osteoporosis International, 16, S3
  10. McBreairty LE, 2020, Bone Reports, 100248, 12
  11. 10.1080/14656566.2020.1743266 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/gerona/glz162 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/S8756-3282(00)00249-0 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90053-4 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Candow, D. G., Chilibeck, P. D., Gordon, J., Vogt, E., Landeryou, T., Kaviani, M., & Paus-Jensen, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Regina, Regina, Canada
  • University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
  • Acadia University, Wolfville, Canada
Venue
Nutrition and Health
Published
2020-11-24
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
151-159
ISSN
  • 0260-1060
  • 2047-945X
Cited by
31
References
13
Language
en
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Funders
  • Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation
  • Canada Foundation for Innovation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.