Cited by 325

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Teacher Leadership—Improvement through Empowerment?: An Overview of the Literature

Muijs, Daniel, Harris, Alma·2003·Educational Management & Administration

Abstract

As the limitations of the `charismatic head' theories of leadership in schools have become ever more apparent, there has been a move towards teacher leadership, characterized by a form of collective leadership in which teachers develop expertise by working collaboratively. In this article, the possible benefits of teacher leadership are explored, as well as the possible barriers to and opportunities for making teacher leadership work in practice. It is concluded that teacher leadership could have beneficial effects on school improvement, school and teacher effectiveness and teacher motivation and retention, but that the right conditions need to be in place in order for teacher leadership to flourish. The lack of research on teacher leadership in the UK is noted.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0263211x030314007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Improved culture from PLCs includes increased teacher commitment to the school's mission and values, higher teacher commitment to change, shared responsibility for student success, shared norms for teaching and assessment, and improved institutionalization of organizational improvements.

    “This improved culture includes increased teacher commitment to the school's mission and values (Gregory & Kuzmich, 2007;Hord, 1997;Muijs & Harris, 2003;Wahlstrom & Louis, 2008), higher teacher commitment to change (Giles & Hargreaves, 2006;Gregory & Kuzmich, 2007;Hord, 1997;Rasberry & Mahajan, 2008), shared responsibility for student success (Gregory & Kuzmich, 2007;Hord, 1997), shared norms for”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Ash, R.L. and Persall, M. (2000) The Principal as Chief Learning Officer: Developing Teacher Leaders . NASSP Bulletin May 2000: 15-22 . · DOI
  2. Barth, R.S. (2000) Teacher Leader . Phi Delta Kappan February: 443-449 . · DOI
  3. Beane, J.A. (1998) Reclaiming a Democratic Purpose for Education . Education Leadership 56(2): 8-11 .
  4. Berliner, D. (1983) The Executive Functions of Teachers . Instructor 43(2): 28-40 .
  5. Blegen, M.B. and Kennedy, C. (1999) Principals and Teachers Leading Together . NASSP Bulletin May 2000: 1-5 . · DOI
  6. Caine, G. and Caine, R.N. (2000) The Learning Community as a Foundation for Developing Teacher Leaders . NASSP Bulletin May 2000: 6-13 . · DOI
  7. 10.1080/01626620.1997.10462882 · DOI
  8. Conway, J.A. and Calzi, F. (1996) `The Dark Side of Shared Decision Making' , Educational Leadership 53(4): 45-49 .
  9. 10.1086/461816 · DOI
  10. Day, C. and Harris, A. (2003) `Teacher Leadership, Reflective Practice and School Improvement', in International Handbook of Educational Administration, pp. 724-749. Dordrecht: Kluwer . · DOI
  11. Day, C., Harris, A. and Hadfield, M. (2000) `Grounding Knowledge of Schools in Stakeholder Realities: A Multi-Perspective Study of Effective School Leaders' , School Leadership and Management 21(1): 19-42 . · DOI
  12. 10.1086/461813 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/0263211X000283006 · DOI
  14. Hackney, C. and Henderson, J. (1999) `Educating School Leaders for Inquiry Based Democratic Learning Communities' , Educational Horizons 77(3): 67-73 .
  15. Hargreaves, A. (2002) `Professional Learning Communities and Performance Training Cults: The Emerging Apartheid of School Improvement', in A. Harris, C. Day, M. Hadfield, D. Hopkins, A. Hargreaves and Chapman, C. (eds) Effective Leadership for School Improvement. London: Routledge .
  16. Harris, A. and Chapman, C. (2002) Leadership in Schools Facing Challenging Circumstances. London: Department for Education and Skills . · DOI
  17. Harris, A. and Lambert, L. (2003) Building Leadership Capacity for School Improvement. London: Open University Press .
  18. 10.1086/461812 · DOI
  19. Helm, Clare (1989) Cultural and Symbolic Leadership in Catholic Elementary Schools: An Ethnographic Study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Catholic University of America, Washington, DC.
  20. Holden, G. (2002) Towards a Learning Community: The Role of Teacher-Led Development in School Improvement . Paper presented at the CELSI British Council Leadership in Learning Conference, London. · DOI
  21. King, M.B.et al. (1996) `Participatory Decision Making', in M.B. King (ed.) Restructuring for Authentic Student Achievement: The Impact of Culture and Structure in 24 Schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
  22. 10.1080/01626620.1997.10462877 · DOI
  23. Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D. and Steinbach, R. (1998) Changing Leadership For Changing Times. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press .
  24. Leithwood, K., Tomlinson, D. and Genge, M. (1996) `Transformational School Leadership', in K. Leithwoodet al. (eds), International Handbook on Educational Leadership and Administration, pp. 785-840. Netherlands: Kluwer Press . · DOI
  25. Lieberman, A., Saxl, E.R. and Miles, M.B. (2000) `Teacher Leadership: Ideology and Practice', in The Jossey-Bass Reader on Educational Leadership, pp. 339-345. Chicago: Jossey-Bass .
  26. Little, J.W. (1990) `The Persistence of Privacy: Autonomy and Initiative in Teachers' Professional Relations' , Teachers College Record 91: 50-536 . · DOI
  27. 10.1086/461814 · DOI
  28. MacBeath, J. (ed.) (1998) Effective School Leadership: Responding to Change. London: Paul Chapman . · DOI
  29. Magee, M. (1999) `Curse of the Trophy' , Journal of Staff Development 20(4): 23-26 .
  30. Morrison, K. (2002) School Leadership and Complexity Theory. London: Routledge Falmer .
  31. Rosenholz, S. (1989) Teachers' Workplace: The Social Organisation of Schools. New York: Teachers College Press .
  32. Seashore-Louis, K., Kruse, S.et al. (1996) `Putting Teachers at the Center of Reform: Learning Schools and Professional Communities' , Bulletin May: 10-21 . · DOI
  33. Shen, J. (1988) `Do Teachers Feel Empowered?' , Educational Leadership 55(7): 35-36 .
  34. 10.1086/461811 · DOI
  35. Teitel, L. (1997) `Professional Development Schools and the Transformation of Teacher Leadership' , Teacher Education Quarterly 24(1): 9-22 .
  36. Vail, A. and Redick, S. (1993) `Predictors of Teacher Leadership Performance of Vocational and Nonvocational Teachers' , Journal of Vocational Education 18(1): 51-76 .
  37. Wasley, P.A. (1991) Teachers Who Lead: The Rhetoric of Reform and the Realities of Practice. New York: Teachers College Press .
  38. Weiss, C. (1993) `Shared Decision Making About What? A Comparison of Schools With and Without Teacher Participation' , Teachers College Record 95(1): 69-92 .
  39. West, M., Jackson, D., Harris, A. and Hopkins, D. (2000) `Leadership for School Improvement', in K. Riley and K. Seashore-Louis Leadership for Change. London: Routledge Falmer .
  40. Wettersten, J.A. (1994) Low Profile, High Impact: Four Case Studies of High School Department Chairs Whose Transactions Transform Teachers and Administrators . Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  41. Whitaker, T. (1995) `Informal Teacher Leadership—The Key to Successful Change in the Middle Level School' , NASSP Bulletin 79(567): 76-81 . · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Muijs, D., & Harris, A.
Venue
Educational Management & Administration
Published
2003-10
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
437-448
ISSN
0263-211X
Cited by
325
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review