Cited by 437Posthumanist Ethics and ActivismSpatial and Cultural StudiesPhilosophical and Theoretical Analysis

‘Objects and Spaces’

Law, John·2002·Theory, Culture & Society

Abstract

Law's article begins by restating the classical ANT position that objects do not exist `in themselves' but are the effect of a performative stabilization of relational networks. In addition, these material enactments inevitably have a spatial dimension; they simultaneously establish spatial conditions for objectual identity, continuity, and difference. Space must not be reified as a natural, pre-existing container of the social and the material, but is itself a performance. Moreover, there are multiple forms of spatiality beyond the Euclidean space of regions (e.g. networks and fluids), and objects may exist and achieve homeomorphism within several different spatial systems. Technologies such as the Zimbabwe Bush Pump present a fluid object which is able to exist and cohere without the presence of fixed boundaries or the permanence of a particular functional definition. The network logic, however, which gravitates towards stability and functionality, tends to exclude and silence this spatial Other. An alternative political ontology is needed which goes beyond the reification of network space in order to give voice to the fluid objects which escape its unidimensional functionality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/026327602761899165

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Science and technology studies and Asian worldviews, as found in Buddhist scholasticism and various branches of Hinduism, share a similar stance on objects.

    “I shall start with a provocative reconciliation: science and technology studies and Asian worldviews, as found in Buddhist scholasticism and various branches of Hinduism, share a similar stance on objects.”
  • Objects acquire meaning in a specific context, itself embedded in a relational network at a specific point in time and space.

    “objects acquire meaning in a specific context, itself embedded in a relational network at a specific point in time and space.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Law, J.
Affiliations
Lancaster University (GB)
Corresponding author
Law, John
Venue
Theory, Culture & Society
Published
2002-12
Volume
19
Issue
5-6
Pages
91-105
ISSN
  • 0263-2764 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-3616
OpenAlex
W2764585606
Cited by
437
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 26
FWCI
130.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Theory Culture & Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Spatial and Cultural Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis
Keywords
actor-network theory, materiality, spatiality, network logic, homeomorphism, political ontology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review