The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Posthuman, All Too Human: Towards a New Process Ontology
Abstract
This article looks at Donna Haraway’s work in the light of Continental philosophy, and especially post-structuralism, and examines both the post-humanist and the post-anthropocentric aspects of her thought. The article argues that the great contribution of Haraway’s work is the re-grounding of the subject in material practice. This neo-foundationalist approach is combined, however, with a firm commitment to a process ontology that looks at subjectivity as a complex and open-ended set of relations. The article argues for the centrality of the notion of relationality in Haraway’s thought, and in this respect her work can be compared to Deleuze’s rhizomic thinking. Special emphasis is placed on the analysis of the relation to other species in comparison with Deleuze’s notion of becoming-animal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Cited by
Rethinking ‘Sex Robots’: Gender, Desire, and Embodiment in Posthuman Sextech
Locatelli, C. (2022) · Journal of Digital Social Research · doi:10.33621/jdsr.v4i3.87 · Cited by 17
Unraveling the colonialities of climate change and action
De la Hoz, N., Silva-Garzón, D., Hernández Vidal, N., Gutierrez Escobar, L., Hasenfratz, M., & Fladvad, B. (2024) · Journal of Political Ecology · doi:10.2458/jpe.6365 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Braidotti, R.
- Venue
- Theory, Culture & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 7-8
- Pages
- 197-208
- ISSN
- 0263-2764 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3616
- OpenAlex
- W2119988049
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 62.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
