The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A New Climate for Society
Open accessAbstract
This article argues that climate change produces discordances in established ways of understanding the human place in nature, and so offers unique challenges and opportunities for the interpretive social sciences. Scientific assessments such as those of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change helped establish climate change as a global phenomenon, but in the process they detached knowledge from meaning. Climate facts arise from impersonal observation whereas meanings emerge from embedded experience. Climate science thus cuts against the grain of common sense and undermines existing social institutions and ethical commitments at four levels: communal, political, spatial and temporal. The article explores the tensions that arise when the impersonal, apolitical and universal imaginary of climate change projected by science comes into conflict with the subjective, situated and normative imaginations of human actors engaging with nature. It points to current environmental debates in which a reintegration of scientific representations of the climate with social responses to those representations is taking place. It suggests how the interpretive social sciences can foster a more complex understanding of humanity’s climate predicament. An important aim of this analysis is to offer a framework in which to think about the human and the social in a climate that seems to render obsolete important prior categories of solidarity and experience.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science
Wynne, B. (1992) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1088/0963-6625/1/3/004 · Cited by 1,675
Cited by
On the nature of barriers to climate change adaptation
Biesbroek, G. R., Klostermann, J. E. M., Termeer, C. J. A. M., & Kabat, P. (2013) · Regional Environmental Change · doi:10.1007/s10113-013-0421-y · Cited by 677
Lövbrand, E., Beck, S., Chilvers, J., Forsyth, T., Hedrén, J., Hulme, M., Lidskog, R., & Vasileiadou, E. (2015) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.012 · Cited by 517
Co-Producing Sustainability: Reordering the Governance of Science, Policy, and Practice
Wyborn, C., Datta, A., Montana, J., Ryan, M., Leith, P., Chaffin, B., Miller, C., & van Kerkhoff, L. (2019) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033103 · Cited by 485
Materials and devices of the public: an introduction
Marres, N., & Lezaun, J. (2011) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085147.2011.602293 · Cited by 391
The social media life of climate change: Platforms, publics, and future imaginaries
Pearce, W., Niederer, S., Özkula, S. M., & Sánchez Querubín, N. (2019) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.569 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Jasanoff, S.
- Venue
- Theory, Culture & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 233-253
- ISSN
- 0263-2764 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3616
- OpenAlex
- W2145733300
- Cited by
- 877
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 708.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A New Climate for Society. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0263276409361497
- The paper
- Jasanoff, S. (2010). A New Climate for Society. Theory, Culture & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409361497
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.