The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Pop-up governance: Transforming the management of migrant populations through humanitarian and security practices in Lesbos, Greece, 2015–2017
Open accessAbstract
This paper intervenes in recent debates on humanitarianism and security in migration by introducing the notion of ‘pop-up governance’. It reflects on our two year-long fieldwork on Lesbos, Greece at the peak of Europe’s migrant reception crisis (2015–2017). We present recent developments in border and migration management in the EU and we position these within recent migration debates. We then present the two main facets guiding migrant reception and governance in Lesbos, namely humanitarianism and security. Through our interviews with humanitarian and security actors we show how top-level government decisions followed and resembled the flexibility and adaptability of humanitarian and security operations. We define this turn as ‘pop-up governance’, which comprises a practice-based, abruptly introduced and retractable set of governance mechanisms responding to the situation at hand. We argue that the seemingly disorganised management of migration actually bore hallmarks of a new, flexible and adaptable mode of governance. Finally, we show how ‘pop-up governance’ can help move beyond present understanding of governance based either on the rule or its exception. This has important implications for our comprehension of migration, humanitarianism, security and the governance of vulnerable populations and contemporary socio-political crises.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The hotspot approach as it enveloped Lesvos can be seen as a manufactured emergency (Papada et al., 2020).”
From The humanitarian border as a violence‐producing environment: revisiting aid and anti‐migration protests on Lesvos, Greece (2025) · cites this paper as Papada et al., 2020
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 56
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- 10.1068/a43576 · DOI
- Agier M, 2011, Managing the Undesirables: Refugee Camps and Humanitarian Government
- 10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800030 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2008.00055.x · DOI
- 10.1163/15718166-12342061 · DOI
- Basaran T (2015) The curious state of the good Samaritan: Humanitarianism under conditions of security. In: Kinvall C and Svensson S (eds) Governing Borders and Security: The Politics of Connectivity and Dispersal . Abingdon: Routledge.
- 10.1177/03043754020270S105 · DOI
- 10.1177/0967010614530459 · DOI
- 10.1080/13604810500092106 · DOI
- Campesi G, 2014, South-East European Journal of Political Science, 2, 126
- 10.1177/0967010614533243 · DOI
- 10.1111/anti.12337 · DOI
- Fassin D, 2012, Humanitarian Reason: A Moral History of the Present
- Ferreri M, 2015, Ephemera, 15, 181
- 10.1177/233150241400200302 · DOI
- 10.1111/tesg.12285 · DOI
- 10.1111/gec3.12248 · DOI
- 10.26522/ssj.v1i1.977 · DOI
- 10.1111/1468-5965.00263 · DOI
- 10.1080/13629395.2016.1145825 · DOI
- 10.1111/ips.12002 · DOI
- 10.1177/1354066116661227 · DOI
- Massey D, 2005, For Space
- 10.1111/jcms.12651 · DOI
- 10.1080/13604813.2017.1325231 · DOI
- 10.2307/j.ctt22nmc35.13 · DOI
- Peck J, 2016, Fast Policy: Experimental Statecraft at the Thresholds of Neoliberalism
- 10.1177/0263775819835819 · DOI
- 10.4159/9780674369818 · DOI
- 10.1111/anti.12320 · DOI
- 10.1177/0309132517717786 · DOI
- 10.1177/0263775818759335 · DOI
- 10.1080/07036337.2013.848206 · DOI
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747024.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.2307/j.ctv7vctnm · DOI
- 10.4324/9780203116937 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.01.001 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Papada, E., Papoutsi, A., Painter, J., & Vradis, A.
- Affiliations
- Loughborough University (GB)
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- Durham University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Vradis, Antonis
- Venue
- Environment and Planning D: Society and Space
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-12-08
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1028-1045
- ISSN
- 0263-7758 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-3433
- OpenAlex
- W2995861010
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 7.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Environment and Planning D Society and Space (publishedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/N013700/1)
- ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, University of Southampton (ES/N013700/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Gender and Women's Rights
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Keywords
- migrant reception, humanitarianism, migration security, border management, EU migration policy, Lesbos, rule and exception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review