Cited by 56Migration and Exile StudiesGender and Women's RightsMigration, Refugees, and Integration

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Pop-up governance: Transforming the management of migrant populations through humanitarian and security practices in Lesbos, Greece, 2015–2017

Open access
Papada, Evie, Papoutsi, Anna, Painter, Joe, Vradis, Antonis·2020·Environment and Planning D: Society and Space

Abstract

This paper intervenes in recent debates on humanitarianism and security in migration by introducing the notion of ‘pop-up governance’. It reflects on our two year-long fieldwork on Lesbos, Greece at the peak of Europe’s migrant reception crisis (2015–2017). We present recent developments in border and migration management in the EU and we position these within recent migration debates. We then present the two main facets guiding migrant reception and governance in Lesbos, namely humanitarianism and security. Through our interviews with humanitarian and security actors we show how top-level government decisions followed and resembled the flexibility and adaptability of humanitarian and security operations. We define this turn as ‘pop-up governance’, which comprises a practice-based, abruptly introduced and retractable set of governance mechanisms responding to the situation at hand. We argue that the seemingly disorganised management of migration actually bore hallmarks of a new, flexible and adaptable mode of governance. Finally, we show how ‘pop-up governance’ can help move beyond present understanding of governance based either on the rule or its exception. This has important implications for our comprehension of migration, humanitarianism, security and the governance of vulnerable populations and contemporary socio-political crises.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0263775819891167

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 56

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. 10.1068/a43576 · DOI
  2. Agier M, 2011, Managing the Undesirables: Refugee Camps and Humanitarian Government
  3. 10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800030 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2008.00055.x · DOI
  5. 10.1163/15718166-12342061 · DOI
  6. Basaran T (2015) The curious state of the good Samaritan: Humanitarianism under conditions of security. In: Kinvall C and Svensson S (eds) Governing Borders and Security: The Politics of Connectivity and Dispersal . Abingdon: Routledge.
  7. 10.1177/03043754020270S105 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/0967010614530459 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/13604810500092106 · DOI
  10. Campesi G, 2014, South-East European Journal of Political Science, 2, 126
  11. 10.1177/0967010614533243 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/anti.12337 · DOI
  13. Fassin D, 2012, Humanitarian Reason: A Moral History of the Present
  14. Ferreri M, 2015, Ephemera, 15, 181
  15. 10.1177/233150241400200302 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/tesg.12285 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/gec3.12248 · DOI
  18. 10.26522/ssj.v1i1.977 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/1468-5965.00263 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/13629395.2016.1145825 · DOI
  21. 10.1111/ips.12002 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/1354066116661227 · DOI
  23. Massey D, 2005, For Space
  24. 10.1111/jcms.12651 · DOI
  25. 10.1080/13604813.2017.1325231 · DOI
  26. 10.2307/j.ctt22nmc35.13 · DOI
  27. Peck J, 2016, Fast Policy: Experimental Statecraft at the Thresholds of Neoliberalism
  28. 10.1177/0263775819835819 · DOI
  29. 10.4159/9780674369818 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/anti.12320 · DOI
  31. 10.1177/0309132517717786 · DOI
  32. 10.1177/0263775818759335 · DOI
  33. 10.1080/07036337.2013.848206 · DOI
  34. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747024.001.0001 · DOI
  35. 10.2307/j.ctv7vctnm · DOI
  36. 10.4324/9780203116937 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.01.001 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Papada, E., Papoutsi, A., Painter, J., & Vradis, A.
Affiliations
  • Loughborough University (GB)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Durham University (GB)
Corresponding author
Vradis, Antonis
Venue
Environment and Planning D: Society and Space
Published
2019-12-08
Volume
38
Issue
6
Pages
1028-1045
ISSN
  • 0263-7758 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-3433
OpenAlex
W2995861010
Cited by
56
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3
FWCI
7.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Environment and Planning D Society and Space (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/N013700/1)
  • ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, University of Southampton (ES/N013700/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Gender and Women's Rights
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Keywords
migrant reception, humanitarianism, migration security, border management, EU migration policy, Lesbos, rule and exception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review