Cited by 139Attachment and Relationship DynamicsMarriage and Sexual RelationshipsFamily Dynamics and Relationships

Attachment and conflict communication in adult romantic relationships

Domingue, Rachel, Mollen, Debra·2009·Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

Abstract

This study explored the connections between adult attachment styles (i.e., secure, preoccupied, fearful-avoidant, dismissing) and communication patterns during conflict (i.e., mutual constructive, demand-withdraw, mutual avoidance, and withholding). Specifically, this study examined how the combination of both partners’ attachment styles, or couple type (i.e., secure-secure, secure-insecure, insecure-insecure), related to self-reported conflict communication patterns. Couples had been together for at least two years (i.e., in a dating, cohabitating, engaged, or marital relationship). Participants included 43 different-sex couples and 10 same-sex couples, who lived primarily in a large metropolitan area in the southwestern US. Secure-secure couples reported the most mutually constructive communication, while the insecure-insecure couples group reported the most demand-withdraw and mutual avoidance and withholding communication. Implications for counseling with couples and families are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0265407509347932

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Attachment security can be fostered in the family and in other relationships via mutually constructive communication that involves synchronous interactions.

    “Attachment security can be fostered in the family and in other relationships via mutually constructive communication (Domingue & Mollen, 2009) that involves synchronous interactions (e.g., by phone, if the communication partner is not present; Gentzler, Oberhauser, Westerman, & Nadorff, 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Domingue, R., & Mollen, D.
Affiliations
Texas Woman's University (US)
Venue
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
Published
2009-08
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
678-696
ISSN
  • 0265-4075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-3608
OpenAlex
W2113690193
Cited by
139
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
FWCI
7.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
adult attachment styles, romantic relationships, conflict communication, secure attachment, preoccupied attachment, fearful attachment, dismissing attachment, mutual avoidance, withholding, same-sex couples, couple counseling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review