Adolescents’ responses to the distress of others: The influence of multiple attachment figures via empathic concern
Open accessAbstract
Attachment theory provides an informative theoretical description of how prosocial behaviors in response to the distress of others may be socialized. This study aimed to investigate associations between attachment security to mothers, fathers, closest grandparents and peers, and young adolescents’ (a) prosocial responses to others’ distress and (b) global prosocial behaviors, via the mediation of empathic concern. Cross-sectional survey data were obtained from 520 adolescents (aged 11–14) from nine schools in Cape Town, South Africa. Structural equation modeling revealed that a model in which all paths from the attachment variables were routed through empathic concern was superior to a model which proposed only direct effects of attachment on prosocial behavior. Peer and grandparent attachment were significantly associated, through empathic concern, with self-reported helping in response to others’ distress. For teacher-reported global prosocial behavior, the indirect effects of peer and grandparent attachment failed to reach significance. The results provide theoretical insight into the association between secure attachments and prosocial behavior, and highlight the importance of relationships with friends and grandparents in early adolescence.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In early childhood, the single parental attachment may be transformed into multiple attachment relationships with multiple attachment figures formed in adolescence.
“In early childhood, the single parental attachment may be transformed into multiple attachment relationships with multiple attachment figures formed in adolescence [42].”
From The Relationship between Empathy and Attachment in Children and Adolescents: Three-Level Meta-Analyses. (2022) · cites this paper as [42]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 181 · Cited by 7
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- Ainsworth, M.D.S. (1967). Infancy in Uganda: Infant care and the growth of love. Oxford, England: John Hopkins Press.
- Ainsworth, M.D.S. (1982). Attachment: Retrospect and prospect. In C.M. Parks & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.), The place of attachment in human behaviour (pp. 3-30). London, England: Tavistock Publications.
- Allen, J.P., & Land, D. (1999). Attachment in adolescence. In J. Cassidy & P.R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 319- 335). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- Amoateng, A. Y., & Richter, L. M. (2007). Social and economic context of families and households in South Africa. In A. Y. Amoateng, & T. B. Heaton (Eds.), Families and households in post-apartheid South Africa: Socio-demographic perspectives (pp. 1-25). Cape Town, South Africa: HSRC Press.
- Armsden, G. (1986). Attachment to parents and peers in late adolescence: Relationships to affective status, self-esteem, and coping with loss, threat and challenges (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
- Attar-Schwartz, S., Tan, J-P., Buchanan, A., Flouri, E., & Griggs, J. (2009). Grandparenting and adolescent adjustment in two-parent biological, lone-parent, and step-families. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 67-75.
- Carlo, G., & Randall, B.A. (2002). The development of a measure of prosocial behaviours for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 31-44.
- Carlo, G., Crockett, L.J., Randall, B.A., & Roesch, S.C. (2007). A latent growth curve analysis of prosocial behaviour among rural adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17, 301-324.
- Carlo, G., McGinley, M., Hayes, R., Batenhorst, C., & Wilkinson, J. (2007). Parenting styles or practices? Parenting, sympathy, and prosocial behaviours among adolescents. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 168, 147-176.
- Carlo, G., Mestre, V., Mcginley, M., & Samper, P. (2014). The protective role of prosocial behaviours on antisocial behaviours: The mediating effects of deviant peer affiliation. Journal of Adolescence, 37, 359-366.
- Chou, C-P., & Bentler, P.M. (1995). Estimates and tests in Structural Equation Modelling. In R.H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural Equation Modelling (pp. 37-55). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Cozby, P. C. (2009). Methods in Behavioral Research (10th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw- Hill.
- Eisenberg, N., & Spinrad, T.L. (2014). Multidimensionality of prosocial behaviour: Rethinking the conceptualization and development of prosocial behaviour. In L.M. Padilla-Walker, & G. Carlo (Eds.), Prosocial development: A multidimensional approach (pp. 17-39). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Ellis, C., Quist, M., Robinson, R., & Peterson, D. (2010). Grandparent/grandchild relationship: Linking grandparent involvement to adolescent prosocial behaviours. FHSS Mentored Research Conference. Book 58. Retrieved from http://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/fhssconference_studentpub/58
- Freeman, H., & Brown, B.B. (2001). Primary attachment to parents and peers during adolescence: Differences by attachment style. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30, 653-674.
- George, C., Kaplan, N., & Main, M. (1985). Adult Attachment Interview protocol (2 nd ed.). Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
- Gross, J.J. (2008). Emotion regulation. In M. Lewis, J.M. Haviland-Jones, & Barrett L.F. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- Grossmann, K., Grossmann, K.E., & Kindler, H. (2005). Early care and the roots of attachment and partnership representations: The Bielefeld and Regensburg studies. In K.E. Grossmann, K. Grossmann, & E. Waters (Eds.), Attachment from infancy to adulthood: The major longitudinal studies (pp. 98-136). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- Hastings, P.D., Utendale, W.T., & Sullivan, C. (2007). The socialization of prosocial development. In J.E. Grusec, & P.D. Hastings (Eds.). Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 638-664). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
- Iacobucci, D. (2009). Structural Equations Modelling: Fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 90-98.
- Jacobsen, L.A., Mather, M., & Dupuis, G. (2012). Household changes in the United States. Population Bulletin, 67.
- Keskin, G., & Çam, O. (2010). Adolescents' strengths and difficulties: Approach to attachment styles. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 17, 433-441.
- Khalid, S., Ahmed, F., & Imdad, M. (2012). Grandparenting and adolescents' personality development. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 48, 143-147.
- Kornhaber, A., & Woodward, K.L. (1981). Grandparents/grandchildren: The vital connection. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Double Day
- Main, M., & Weston, D.R. (1982). Avoidance of the attachment figure in infancy: Descriptions and interpretations. In C.M. Parks, & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.), The place of attachment in human behaviour (pp. 31-59). London, England: Tavistock Publications.
- Meeus, W., Oosterwegel, A., & Vollebergh, W. (2002). Parental and peer attachment and identity development in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 25, 93-106.
- Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P.R. (2003). The attachment behavioural system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. In P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Volume 35 (pp. 53-152). New York, NY: Academic Press.
- Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P.R. (2009). An attachment and behavioural systems perspective on social support. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 7-19.
- Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P.R., Cassidy, J., & Berant, E. (2009). Attachment-related defensive processes. In J.H. Obegi, & E. Berant (Eds.), Attachment theory and research in clinical work with adults (293-327). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- Padilla-Walker, L.M. (2014). Parental socialization of prosocial behaviour. In L.M. Padilla- Walker, & G. Carlo (Eds.), Prosocial development: A multidimensional approach (pp. 131-149). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Bhana, A. J. Flisher, L. Swartz, & L. Richter (Eds.), Promoting mental health in scarce-resource contexts: Emerging evidence and practice (pp. 3-20). Cape Town, South Africa: HSRC Press.
- Rice, K.G., Cunningham, T.J., & Young, M.B. (1997). Attachment to parents, social competence, and emotional well-being: A comparison of black and white late adolescents. Journal of Counselling Psychology,44, 89-101.
- Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for Structural Equation Modelling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48. Retrieved from https://www.jstatsoft.org/article/view/v048i02/v48i02.pdf
- Sameroff A.J., & Chandler, M.J. (1975). Reproductive risk and the continuum of caretaking casualty. In: F.D. Horowitz, E.M. Hetherington, S. Scarr-Salapatek, & G.M. Siegel (Eds.), Review of child development research. 4. (pp. 187-244). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Satorra, A., & Bentler, P.M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors on covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye, & C.C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis (pp. 399-419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Thompson, R.A. (1999). Early attachment and later development. In J. Cassidy, & P.R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 265-286). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- Weiss, R.S. (1982). Attachment in adult life. In C.M. Parks, & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.), The place of attachment in human behaviour (pp. 171-184). London, England: Tavistock Publications.
- Wentzel, K.R. (2014). Prosocial behaviour and peer relations in adolescence. In L.M. Padilla- Walker, & G. Carlo (Eds.), Prosocial development: A multidimensional approach (pp. 3-14). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Wild, L.G., & Gaibie, F. (2014). Grandparental involvement and South African adolescents' psychological well-being. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 12, 425-441.
- Authors
- Profe, W. B., Wild, L. G., & Tredoux, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Cape Town (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Wild, Lauren G.
- Venue
- Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-03-17
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1671-1691
- ISSN
- 0265-4075 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3608
- OpenAlex
- W2580546728
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 181
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 0.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Journal of Social and Personal Relationships (publishedVersion)
- Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Keywords
- attachment security, empathic concern, prosocial behavior, helping behavior, adolescents, peer attachment, maternal attachment, paternal attachment, mediation, early adolescence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review