The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Self-assessment of language proficiency: rationale and applications
Abstract
During the last 10 years there has been a surge of interest in methods for self- assessment of foreign language proficiency. Work has been undertaken in many parts of the world and several reports on both theoretical and practical issues have been published recently. This paper outlines the justification for adopting self-assessment principles in language teaching and learning, makes references to research and sources supporting the statements made, and also presents some ideas and materials that illustrate developments taking place.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Journals can be used to help learners systematically collect data on their learning.”
From Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis (2000) · cites this paper as M.Oscarson, 1989
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Blanche, P., 1986, The DLIFLC Study
- Clark, J., 1980, Modern Languages in Scotland, 19, 61
- Green P., 1987, Classroom assessment in a communicative approach
- Coste, D., 1983, Contributions to a renewal of language learning and teaching: some current work in Europe
- Dam, L., 1984, Autonomi i fremmedsprogstilegnelsen
- 10.1016/0346-251X(85)90015-6 · DOI
- 10.1093/elt/XXXV.1.1 · DOI
- 1987, Self-instruction in language learning
- Ferris, D., 1983, The influence of the continuous self-evaluation of oral skills on language learning methodology
- Holec, H., 1980, Autonomy and foreign language learning
- Holec, H., 1988, Autonomy and self-directed learning: present fields of application
- Huttonen, I., 1986, Towards learner autonomy in foreign language learning in senior secondary school
- Jones, C., 1986, Using computers in the language classroom: a practical guide for teachers
- 10.2307/3586670 · DOI
- Lee, Y.P., 1985, New directions in language testing
- Oskarsson, M., 1980, Approaches to self-assessment in foreign language learning
- 1984, Self-assessment of foreign language skills: a survey of research and development work
- Page, B., 1985, Graded objectives in modern language learning
- Painchaud, G., 1984, Etudes de Linguistique Appliquee, 56, 88
- Richterich, R., Case studies in identifying language needs
- Schärer, R., 1983, Identification of learner needs at Eurocentres
- Trim, J.L.M., 1980, Foreword
- 1981, Résumé (of Project Report)
- Zettersten, A., 1985, Experiments in large-scale vocabulary testing
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00136 · Cited by 2,569
Metadata
- Authors
- Oscarson, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Oscarson, Mats
- Venue
- Language Testing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1989-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-13
- ISSN
- 0265-5322 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0946
- OpenAlex
- W2144198174
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 23.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Language Testing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Keywords
- self-assessment, foreign language proficiency, language proficiency assessment, language teaching and learning, learner autonomy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review