Cited by 247EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningStudent Assessment and FeedbackSecond Language Learning and Teaching

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Self-assessment of language proficiency: rationale and applications

Oscarson, Mats·1989·Language Testing

Abstract

During the last 10 years there has been a surge of interest in methods for self- assessment of foreign language proficiency. Work has been undertaken in many parts of the world and several reports on both theoretical and practical issues have been published recently. This paper outlines the justification for adopting self-assessment principles in language teaching and learning, makes references to research and sources supporting the statements made, and also presents some ideas and materials that illustrate developments taking place.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/026553228900600103

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Blanche, P., 1986, The DLIFLC Study
  2. Clark, J., 1980, Modern Languages in Scotland, 19, 61
  3. Green P., 1987, Classroom assessment in a communicative approach
  4. Coste, D., 1983, Contributions to a renewal of language learning and teaching: some current work in Europe
  5. Dam, L., 1984, Autonomi i fremmedsprogstilegnelsen
  6. 10.1016/0346-251X(85)90015-6 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/elt/XXXV.1.1 · DOI
  8. 1987, Self-instruction in language learning
  9. Ferris, D., 1983, The influence of the continuous self-evaluation of oral skills on language learning methodology
  10. Holec, H., 1980, Autonomy and foreign language learning
  11. Holec, H., 1988, Autonomy and self-directed learning: present fields of application
  12. Huttonen, I., 1986, Towards learner autonomy in foreign language learning in senior secondary school
  13. Jones, C., 1986, Using computers in the language classroom: a practical guide for teachers
  14. 10.2307/3586670 · DOI
  15. Lee, Y.P., 1985, New directions in language testing
  16. Oskarsson, M., 1980, Approaches to self-assessment in foreign language learning
  17. 1984, Self-assessment of foreign language skills: a survey of research and development work
  18. Page, B., 1985, Graded objectives in modern language learning
  19. Painchaud, G., 1984, Etudes de Linguistique Appliquee, 56, 88
  20. Richterich, R., Case studies in identifying language needs
  21. Schärer, R., 1983, Identification of learner needs at Eurocentres
  22. Trim, J.L.M., 1980, Foreword
  23. 1981, Résumé (of Project Report)
  24. Zettersten, A., 1985, Experiments in large-scale vocabulary testing

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 247

Metadata

Authors
Oscarson, M.
Affiliations
University of Gothenburg (SE)
Corresponding author
Oscarson, Mats
Venue
Language Testing
Published
1989-06
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
1-13
ISSN
  • 0265-5322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0946
OpenAlex
W2144198174
Cited by
247
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
FWCI
23.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Language Testing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
self-assessment, foreign language proficiency, language proficiency assessment, language teaching and learning, learner autonomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review