The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding academic entrepreneurship: Exploring the emergence of university spin-off ventures using process theories
Abstract
This article explores how the use of process theories can lead to a better understanding of the university spin-off venture formation process. The most frequently used conceptualization of the new venture formation process is the stage model or life-cycle theory. However, no conceptual framework exists to describe how the venturing process proceeds from one stage to the next. Based on a longitudinal study of the initiation and early development of four university spin-offs, this article shows that life-cycle, teleological, dialectic and evolutionary theories explain different aspects of the spin-off venturing process. In combination, these theories may provide a more holistic understanding of the academic entrepreneurship process. The assumptions of each theory suggest important implications for further research on academic entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial processes in general.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Hartley, J. (2004) · Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research · doi:10.4135/9781446280119.n26 · Cited by 15,461
Explaining Development and Change in Organizations
van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9508080329 · Cited by 3,762
Cited by
Rippa, P., & Secundo, G. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.013 · Cited by 361
How can universities facilitate academic spin-offs? An entrepreneurial competency perspective
Rasmussen, E., & Wright, M. (2015) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-014-9386-3 · Cited by 269
Self-citationCrossing the valley of death: Five underlying innovation processes
Ellwood, P., Williams, C., & Egan, J. (2022) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102162 · Cited by 126
Metadata
- Authors
- Rasmussen, E.
- Venue
- International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-02-14
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 448-471
- ISSN
- 0266-2426 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2870
- OpenAlex
- W2056882015
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding academic entrepreneurship: Exploring the emergence of university spin-off ventures using process theories. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0266242610385395
- The paper
- Rasmussen, E. (2011). Understanding academic entrepreneurship: Exploring the emergence of university spin-off ventures using process theories. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242610385395
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.