Development consensus in the Internet context: penetration, freedom, and participation in 38 countries
Abstract
The decline of public consensus is often linked to the rise of the Internet. Conceptualizing the Internet as a context, this paper explores its impacts on public consensus on development. The data of the World Values Survey were used for multilevel analyses with 58,926 respondents in 38 countries. It reported three counterbalances. First, Internet penetration weakens public consensus on development, but promotes the individual use of the Internet, which strengthens public consensus on development. Second, Internet freedom and Internet participation contribute to a robust online democracy, which buffers the informational impact of Internet penetration. Third, public consensus on development is nurtured in a context where Internet freedom serves as an instrument to protect an open, free public sphere, but is fragmented by a country’s overall ideological orientation towards freedom.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Articles comparing several political systems found associations that were country-dependent.
“Articles comparing several political systems found associations that were country-dependent124, again highlighting the importance of political context125.”
From A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy (2022) · cites this paper as [125]
Cites
The agenda setting hypothesis in the new media environment
Aruguete, N. (2016) · Comunicación y Sociedad · doi:10.32870/cys.v0i28.2929 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy
Lorenz-Spreen, P., Oswald, L., Lewandowsky, S., & Hertwig, R. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01460-1 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lu, J., & Luo, C.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Luo, Chen
- Venue
- Information Development
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-05-29
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 288-300
- ISSN
- 0266-6669 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-6469
- OpenAlex
- W2947754850
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 2.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Information Development (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Information Society and Technology Trends
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › ICT Impact and Policies
- Keywords
- internet penetration, internet freedom, online participation, digital democracy, public sphere, ideological orientation, World Values Survey, cross-national comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review