Cited by 3Art Therapy and Mental HealthPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Self-therapy through bibliotherapy: A comprehensive review and content analysis for adults

Öztemiz, Semanur, Tekindal, Melike·2025·Information Development

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the studies that use bibliotherapy as a self-therapy method in combating various mental disorders focusing on the subject, method, participants, type of bibliotherapy, the bibliotherapy tool used, and the effects and permanence of bibliotherapy. The research data were compiled from publications indexed in Web of Science without any limitations; and showed that 91 studies addressed bibliotherapy as a self-therapy method for adults. Excluding meta-analyses, systematic reviews, literature reviews, book reviews, theoretical studies, and inaccessible or repeated publications, the remaining 41 publications constituted the scope of this research. The research was conducted using a review and quantitative content analysis. Findings showed that studies addressing bibliotherapy as a self-therapy method were mostly published in 2012, and the participant types at individual and group levels were balanced. The research findings also showed that the experimental method was predominantly used in studies utilizing bibliotherapy as a self-therapy method. Various written or printed works were preferred in these studies, with ‘Feeling Good’ being the most frequently used bibliotherapy tool. These findings may provide insights into understanding the bibliotherapy tools and methods commonly used in research on bibliotherapy as a self-therapy approach for mental disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/02666669241309325

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bibliotherapy can effectively reduce depressive symptoms in adolescents across diverse intervention strategies.

    “Evidence indicates that bibliotherapy can effectively reduce depressive symptoms in adolescents across diverse intervention strategies.”
  • Bibliotherapy can effectively alleviate depressive symptoms.

    “A large body of research has shown that bibliotherapy can effectively alleviate depressive symptoms, for example, through reading relevant books or manuals such as Feeling Good, Mind Over Mood, The Good Mood Guide, and Doing What Matters in Times of Stress: An Illustrated Guide (29).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Öztemiz, S., & Tekindal, M.
Affiliations
  • Hacettepe University (TR)
  • Izmir Kâtip Çelebi University (TR)
Corresponding author
Öztemiz, Semanur
Venue
Information Development
Published
2025-01-17
ISSN
  • 0266-6669 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-6469
OpenAlex
W4406526879
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3
FWCI
15.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Information Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
bibliotherapy, self-therapy, mental illness, adults, feeling good, mental health interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review