Cited by 123Second Language Acquisition and LearningEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningReading and Literacy Development

Text-based tasks and incidental vocabulary learning

Joe, Angela·1995·Second Language Research

Abstract

This case study investigates the vocabulary knowledge gains made by an L2 adult learner of English as a result of performing a read and retell task. The learner participated in a vocabulary knowledge interview, followed by a read and retell task. An oral protocol was taken from the retelling component of the task. Subsequently, a second vocabulary knowledge interview and two multiple-choice tests were completed. The effects of three learning conditions (attention, retrieval and generation) which can facilitate vocabulary learning from text-based tasks are discussed. Attending to the various components of a word and retrieving a to-be-learnt word in a text-based task facilitate the acquisition of unfamiliar words. More importantly, the quality of vocabulary use, or a higher level of generation, appears to have had a more powerful effect on vocabulary acquisition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/026765839501100206

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Words used in productive tasks, particularly those used in original context, were remembered better than words practiced in nonproductive tasks.

    “Words that were used in productive tasks, particularly those used in original context, were remembered better than words practiced in nonproductive tasks (Ellis & He, 1999;Hulstijn & Trompetter, 1998;Joe, 1995Joe, , 1998)).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Joe, A.
Affiliations
Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
Corresponding author
Joe, Angela
Venue
Second Language Research
Published
1995-06
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
149-158
ISSN
  • 0165-9960 (ISSN-L)
  • 0267-6583
  • 1477-0326
OpenAlex
W1996983305
Cited by
123
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Second language Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
incidental vocabulary learning, text-based tasks, vocabulary knowledge, English as a second language, adult learners, attention, retrieval, generations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review