Text-based tasks and incidental vocabulary learning
Abstract
This case study investigates the vocabulary knowledge gains made by an L2 adult learner of English as a result of performing a read and retell task. The learner participated in a vocabulary knowledge interview, followed by a read and retell task. An oral protocol was taken from the retelling component of the task. Subsequently, a second vocabulary knowledge interview and two multiple-choice tests were completed. The effects of three learning conditions (attention, retrieval and generation) which can facilitate vocabulary learning from text-based tasks are discussed. Attending to the various components of a word and retrieving a to-be-learnt word in a text-based task facilitate the acquisition of unfamiliar words. More importantly, the quality of vocabulary use, or a higher level of generation, appears to have had a more powerful effect on vocabulary acquisition.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Words used in productive tasks, particularly those used in original context, were remembered better than words practiced in nonproductive tasks.
“Words that were used in productive tasks, particularly those used in original context, were remembered better than words practiced in nonproductive tasks (Ellis & He, 1999;Hulstijn & Trompetter, 1998;Joe, 1995Joe, , 1998)).”
From Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition (2001) · cites this paper as Joe, 1995
Cites
The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1
SCHMIDT, R. W. (1990) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129 · Cited by 4,910 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning
Schmitt, N. (2008) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168808089921 · Cited by 1,467 · see citing works
Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition
Hulstijn, J. H., & Laufer, B. (2001) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00164 · Cited by 819 · see citing works
Rott, S. (1999) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263199004039 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
Task effectiveness and word learning in a second language: the involvement load hypothesis on trial
Keating, G. D. (2008) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168808089922 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Nakata, T. (2011) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2010.520675 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
A Review on Studies into Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition through Different Input
Tang, Z. (2020) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v13n6p89 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Joe, A.
- Affiliations
- Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Joe, Angela
- Venue
- Second Language Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 149-158
- ISSN
- 0165-9960 (ISSN-L)
- 0267-6583
- 1477-0326
- OpenAlex
- W1996983305
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Second language Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Keywords
- incidental vocabulary learning, text-based tasks, vocabulary knowledge, English as a second language, adult learners, attention, retrieval, generations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review