Cited by 160Second Language Acquisition and LearningEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSubtitles and Audiovisual Media

Task-based interaction and incidental vocabulary learning: a case study

Open access
Newton, Jonathan·1995·Second Language Research

Abstract

This case study examines the vocabulary gains made by an adult learner of English as a second language as a result of performing four communication tasks. Gains were measured on comparisons of pre- and post-tests of vocabulary from the worksheets from the four tasks. These gains are discussed in relation to the interactional processes involving unfamiliar vocabulary. Explicit negotiation of word meaning appeared less deterministic of post-test improvements than use of words in the process of completing the task. While this result may to some extent be an artifact of test design, it is also true that when the group actively used vocabulary which was unfamiliar to the subject of this study, the embedding of this vocabulary in the context of the task and its interactive use are likely to have provided not only important information about word meaning but also the conditions whereby that meaning could be acquired. The placement of a word on task worksheets and the nature of a task, whether a split information task or a shared information task, both had a strong effect on use and acquisition of new vocabulary.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/026765839501100207

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Words that were negotiated during communicative activities were retained better than nonnegotiated words.

    “Words that were negotiated during communicative activities were retained better than nonnegotiated words (Ellis, Tanaka, & Yamazaki, 1994;Newton, 1995).”

Cited by

Authors
Newton, J.
Affiliations
Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
Corresponding author
Newton, Jonathan
Venue
Second Language Research
Published
1995-06
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
159-176
ISSN
  • 0165-9960 (ISSN-L)
  • 0267-6583
  • 1477-0326
OpenAlex
W2163511437
Cited by
160
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Second language Research (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Victoria University of Wellington
  • Victoria University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
Keywords
incidental vocabulary learning, task-based interaction, English as a second language, adult learners, negotiation of meaning, vocabulary acquisition, communicative activities, unfamiliar words

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review