The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A successful modification of ultrafiltration for cardiopulmonary bypass in children
Abstract
Total body water (TBW) is increased after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) resulting in tissue oedema and organ dysfunction. Ultrafiltration has been used to reduce this accumulation of water, although conventional ultrafiltration seemed ineffective in reducing the rise in TBW after CPB in our clinical experience. We describe a modified technique in which ultrafiltration is performed in the first 10 minutes after the patient is weaned from bypass, returning nearly all the blood in the circuit to the patient and elevating the haematocrit (Hct) to any predetermined level. We carried out a pilot study on 21 children aged 4-144 months undergoing open-heart surgery and CPB for congenital heart defects. They were divided into three comparable groups: (1) controls (n = 6); (2) conventional ultrafiltration (n = 7); and (3) modified ultrafiltration (n = 8). TBW (bio-impedance), Hct, osmolality, mean corpuscular volume and mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration were recorded at frequent intervals. Control patients showed elevation of TBW by 18.2% median (range 14.5-20.3), conventional ultrafiltration by 12.4% (7.9-15.0), modified ultrafiltration by 5.7% (4.5-7.1) (p < 0.0001 compared to controls, p < 0.005 compared to conventional ultrafiltration, Mann-Whitney U test). Hct could be elevated to preoperative levels only by the modified method. Mean corpuscular volume, and mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration osmolality were unaltered. Ultrafiltration by the modified method was more effective than conventional ultrafiltration in reducing the rise in TBW and elevating Hct after CPB.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Validation of tetrapolar bioelectrical impedance method to assess human body composition
Lukaski, H. C., Bolonchuk, W. W., Hall, C. B., & Siders, W. A. (1986) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1986.60.4.1327 · Cited by 1,370
Cited by
Tweddell, J. S., Hoffman, G. M., & Mussatto, K. A. (2003) · ACC Current Journal Review · doi:10.1016/s1062-1458(02)01082-6 · Cited by 462
Davies, M. J., Nguyen, K., Gaynor, J. W., & Elliott, M. J. (1998) · The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0022-5223(98)70280-6 · Cited by 167
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Naik, S., Knight, A., & Elliott, M.
- Venue
- Perfusion
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-50
- ISSN
- 0267-6591 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-111X
- OpenAlex
- W2083320684
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A successful modification of ultrafiltration for cardiopulmonary bypass in children. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/026765919100600106
- The paper
- Naik, S., Knight, A., & Elliott, M. (1991). A successful modification of ultrafiltration for cardiopulmonary bypass in children. Perfusion. https://doi.org/10.1177/026765919100600106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.