CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3Gender, Labor, and Family DynamicsEmployment, Labor, and Gender StudiesWork-Family Balance Challenges

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Growing the core economy: Gender, time and sustainable development

Coote, Anna·2012·Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit
DOI 10.1177/0269094212455156
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This Viewpoint considers the case for making more and better use of uncommodified human resources to meet social needs and improve well-being for all. To do this in ways that reduce rather than widen inequalities, it will be necessary to redistribute paid and unpaid time more evenly across the population, especially between women and men.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269094212455156

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Bevan S, 2003, Where’s Daddy? The UK Fathering Deficit
  2. Bok S, 2010, Exploring Happiness from Aristotle to Brain Science
  3. Boyle D, 2009, The Challenge of Co-Production
  4. Boyle D, 2010, Right Here Right Now
  5. Boyle D, 2009, Public Services Inside Out
  6. Brewer M, Sibieta L and Wren-Lewis L (2008) Racing away? Income inequality and the evolution of high incomes . IFS Briefing note 76. Available at: http://www.glasgowlivingwage.co.uk/ (accessed 6 May 2012). · DOI
  7. 10.2307/j.ctt9qgwcr · DOI
  8. Burchardt T, 2008, Time and Income Poverty. CASE Report 57
  9. Cahn E, 2001, No more Throwaway People: The Co-Production Imperative
  10. Coote A, 2010, Cutting It: The ‘Big Society’ and the New Austerity
  11. Coote A, 2009, Green Well Fair
  12. Coote A, 2010, 21 Hours
  13. Goodwin N, 2010, Beyond the Consumption Bubble, 191
  14. Goodwin N, 2003, Microeconomics in Context
  15. Hochschild AR, 2005, Social Research, 72, 339, 10.1353/sor.2005.0042 · DOI
  16. 10.4324/9781849774338 · DOI
  17. Michaelson J, 2009, National Accounts of Well-Being
  18. Perrons D, 2009, Women and Gender Equity in Employment
  19. Slay J, 2011, In This Together: Building Knowledge about Co-Production
  20. Spratt S, 2010, The Great Transition: A Tale of how it Turned out Right
  21. Timmins N, 2001, The Five Giants: A Biography of the Welfare State
  22. Wann M, 1995, Building Social Capital
  23. Workplace Options (2009) Work-life benefits ‘Key to employee satisfaction’. Available at: www.workplaceoptions.co.uk/news/press-releases/2009-21-Dec-work-life-balance-key-to-employee-satisfaction.asp (accessed 15 December 2011).

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Coote, A.
Affiliations
New Economics Foundation (GB)
Corresponding author
Coote, Anna
Venue
Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2012-08-07
Volume
27
Issue
8
Pages
788-795
ISSN
  • 0269-0942 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-9325
DOI
10.1177/0269094212455156
OpenAlex
W2108313292
Cited by
3
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Local Economy The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
Keywords
gender inequality, unpaid work, time use, sustainable development, women's employment, well-being, social needs, inequality reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review