Cited by 108Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Home-based treadmill training for individuals with Parkinson's disease: a randomized controlled pilot trial

Canning, Colleen G, Allen, Natalie E, Dean, Catherine M, Goh, Lina, Fung, Victor SC·2012·Clinical Rehabilitation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of six weeks of home-based treadmill training in people with mild Parkinson's disease. DESIGN: Pilot randomized controlled trial of a six-week intervention followed by a further six weeks follow-up. SETTING: Home-based treadmill training with outcome measures taken at a hospital clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty cognitively intact participants with mild Parkinson's disease and gait disturbance. Two participants from the treadmill training group and one from the control group dropped out. INTERVENTIONS: The treadmill training group undertook a semi-supervised home-based programme of treadmill walking for 20-40 minutes, four times a week for six weeks. The control group received usual care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The feasibility of the intervention was assessed by recording exercise adherence and acceptability, exercise intensity, fatigue, muscle soreness and adverse events. The primary outcome measure of efficacy was walking capacity (6-minute walk test distance). RESULTS: Home-based treadmill training was feasible, acceptable and safe with participants completing 78% (SD 36) of the prescribed training sessions. The treadmill training group did not improve their walking capacity compared to the control group. The treadmill training group showed a greater improvement than the control group in fatigue at post test (P = 0.04) and in quality of life at six weeks follow-up testing (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Semi-supervised home-based treadmill training is a feasible and safe form of exercise for cognitively intact people with mild Parkinson's disease. Further investigation regarding the effectiveness of home-based treadmill training is warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269215511432652

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 108

Authors
Canning, C. G., Allen, N. E., Dean, C. M., Goh, L., & Fung, V. S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • St George Hospital (AU)
Venue
Clinical Rehabilitation
Published
2012-01-18
Volume
26
Issue
9
Pages
817-826
ISSN
  • 0269-2155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0873
OpenAlex
W2169173569
Cited by
108
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
23.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, home-based exercise, treadmill training, gait disturbance, walking capacity, 6-minute walk test, exercise adherence, fatigue, quality of life, feasibility
MeSH terms
Exercise Therapy, Feasibility Studies, Female, Home Care Services, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New South Wales, Parkinson Disease, Pilot Projects, Walking, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Gait Disorders, Neurologic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review