The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Motivational interviewing to increase physical activity in people with chronic health conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to determine if motivational interviewing leads to increased physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness or functional exercise capacity in people with chronic health conditions. Data sources: Seven electronic databases (MEDLINE, PsychINFO, EMBASE, AMED, CINHAL, SPORTDiscus and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials) were searched from inception until January 2014. Trial selection: Two reviewers independently examined publications for inclusion. Trials were included if participants were adults (>18 years), had a chronic health condition, used motivational interviewing as the intervention and examined physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness or functional exercise capacity. Data extraction: Two reviewers independently extracted data. Risk of bias within trials was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale. Data synthesis: Meta-analyses were conducted with standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to evaluate the quality of the evidence. Results: Eleven publications (of ten trials) were included. There was moderate level evidence that motivational interviewing had a small effect in increasing physical activity levels in people with chronic health conditions relative to comparison groups (standardized mean differences = 0.19, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.32, p = 0.004). Sensitivity analysis based on trials that confirmed treatment fidelity produced a larger effect. No conclusive evidence was observed for cardiorespiratory fitness or functional exercise capacity. Conclusion: The addition of motivational interviewing to usual care may lead to modest improvements in physical activity for people with chronic health conditions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“however, evidence regarding their long-term effectiveness is limited [15-17].”
From Consumer-based wearable activity trackers increase physical activity participation: systematic review and meta-analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“Issues with long-term adherence to lifestyle and behavioral change interventions are well recognized [16,17,97].”
From Consumer-based wearable activity trackers increase physical activity participation: systematic review and meta-analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [16]
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group* (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · Cited by 37,554
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1186 · Cited by 36,763
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad · Cited by 23,305
(1985) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 9,143
Cohen, J. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · Cited by 8,771
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
(2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490 · Cited by 8,477
Physical Activity in the United States Measured by Accelerometer
TROIANO, R. P., BERRIGAN, D., DODD, K. W., MÂSSE, L. C., TILERT, T., & MCDOWELL, M. (2008) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e31815a51b3 · Cited by 7,638
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- WHO. Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. Geneva: WHO Press, 2009.
- Caspersen CJ, 1985, Public Health Rep, 100, 126
- Rubak S, 2005, Br J Gen Pract, 55, 305
- Collaboration TC. Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. 5.2 ed. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, 2013.
- 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 · DOI · Paper page
- Quirk F, 2012, Int Angiol, 31, 468
- Hardcastle S, 2013, Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 10, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brickwood, K.-J., Watson, G., O'Brien, J., & Williams, A. D. (2019) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/11819 · Cited by 689
Moyers, T. B., Rowell, L. N., Manuel, J. K., Ernst, D., & Houck, J. M. (2016) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2016.01.001 · Cited by 567
Gillison, F., Rouse, P. C., Standage, M., Sebire, S. J., & Ryan, R. M. (2018) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2018.1534071 · Cited by 604
Frost, H., Campbell, P., Maxwell, M., O’Carroll, R. E., Dombrowski, S. U., Williams, B., Cheyne, H., Coles, E., & Pollock, A. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0204890 · Cited by 459
Zubala, A., MacGillivray, S. A., Frost, H., Kroll, T., Skelton, D. A., Gavine, A. J., Gray, N. M., Toma, M., & Morris, J. H. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0180902 · Cited by 434
Metadata
- Authors
- O’Halloran, P. D., Blackstock, F., Shields, N., Holland, A., Iles, R., Kingsley, M., Bernhardt, J., Lannin, N., Morris, M. E., & Taylor, N. F.
- Affiliations
- La Trobe University (AU)
- Northern Health (AU)
- Monash University (AU)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Clinical Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-06-18
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1159-1171
- ISSN
- 0269-2155 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0873
- OpenAlex
- W2105149876
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 3.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Keywords
- motivational interviewing, physical activity, chronic disease, cardiorespiratory fitness, functional exercise capacity, intervention fidelity, usual care, exercise adherence
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena, Chronic Disease, Humans, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Physical Fitness, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Databases, Bibliographic, Exercise Tolerance, Motivational Interviewing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
