Does advance care planning in addition to usual care reduce hospitalisation for patients with advanced heart failure: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
Open accessAbstract
Background: People with advanced heart failure have repeated hospital admissions. Advance care planning can support patient preferences, but studies in people with heart failure have not been assessed. Aim: To evaluate the literature regarding advance care planning in heart failure. Design: Systematic review and narrative analysis (PROSPERO CRD42017059190). Data sources: Electronic databases were searched (1990 to 23 March 2017): MEDLINE(R), Cochrane Library, CINAHL and Scopus. Four journals were hand searched. Two independent researchers screened against eligibility criteria. One reviewer extracted all data and a sample by a second. Quality was assessed by Cochrane Risk of Bias or the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Tool for Cohort Studies. Results: Out of the 1713 articles, 8 were included representing 14,357 participants from in/outpatient settings from five countries. Two randomised controlled trials and one observational study assessed planning as part of a specialist palliative care intervention; one randomised controlled trial assessed planning in addition to usual cardiology care; one randomised controlled trial and one observational study assessed planning in an integrated cardiology–palliative care model; one observational study assessed evidence of planning (advance directive) as part of usual care and one observational study was a secondary analysis of trial participants coded Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Advance care planning: (1) reduced hospitalisation (5/7 studies); (2) increased referral/use of palliative services (4/4 studies); and (3) supported deaths in the patient-preferred place (2/2 studies). Conclusion: Advance care planning as part of specialist palliative care reduces hospitalisation. Preliminary studies of planning integrated into generic care, accessing specialist palliative care support if needed, are promising.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Evidence from systematic reviews suggests that advance care planning is associated with improvements in symptom control and quality of life.
“Evidence from systematic reviews suggests that advance care planning is associated with improvements in symptom control and quality of life. 9,30,31,37,38,50,59”
From European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions (2021) · cites this paper as [59]
Cites
Detering, K. M., Hancock, A. D., Reade, M. C., & Silvester, W. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c1345 · Cited by 2,332 · see citing works
Rietjens, J. A. C., Sudore, R. L., Connolly, M., van Delden, J. J., Drickamer, M. A., Droger, M., van der Heide, A., Heyland, D. K., Houttekier, D., Janssen, D. J. A., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30582-x · Cited by 1,371 · see citing works
Bekelman, D. B., Rumsfeld, J. S., Havranek, E. P., Yamashita, T. E., Hutt, E., Gottlieb, S. H., Dy, S. M., & Kutner, J. S. (2009) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-009-0931-y · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions
Mentzelopoulos, S. D., Couper, K., Voorde, P. V. D., Druwé, P., Blom, M., Perkins, G. D., Lulic, I., Djakow, J., Raffay, V., Lilja, G., et al. (2021) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.017 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
“planning is associated with improvements in symptom control and quality of life.(9,30,31,37,38,50,59) However, three recent RCTs found no”
Background
- Authors
- Kernick, L. A., Hogg, K. J., Millerick, Y., Murtagh, F. E. M., Djahit, A., & Johnson, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Hull (GB)
- Glasgow Royal Infirmary (GB)
- Glasgow Caledonian University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Kernick, Lucy A
- Venue
- Palliative Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-09-20
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1539-1551
- ISSN
- 0269-2163 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-030X
- OpenAlex
- W2891740652
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7
- FWCI
- 1.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- ResearchOnline (acceptedVersion)
- Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- ResearchOnline (Glasgow Caledonian University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Keywords
- advance care planning, advanced heart failure, hospitalization, palliative care, advance directives, DNACPR, place of death, patient preferences
- MeSH terms
- Heart Failure, Hospitalization, Humans, Palliative Care, Quality of Life, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Advance Care Planning, Narration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review