Cited by 29Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic Care

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Hospital-based bereavement care provision: A cross-sectional survey with health professionals

Open access
Naef, Rahel, Peng-Keller, Simon, Rettke, Horst, Rufer, Michael, Petry, Heidi·2020·Palliative Medicine

Abstract

Background: An in-hospital death is a profound experience for those left behind and has been associated with family members’ psychological morbidity. Supporting bereaved family members is an essential part of end-of-life care and includes attentive presence, information-giving, and emotional and practical support. The actual adoption of hospital-based bereavement care, however, remains little understood. Aim: To investigate hospital-based bereavement care provision and associated barriers. Design: Cross-sectional survey using an online questionnaire. Setting/participants: Health professionals ( n = 196) from two University-affiliated acute and psychiatric hospitals in Switzerland. Results: The most frequent bereavement services (⩾40%) were viewing the deceased, giving information on available support, and making referrals; the most often named barriers were lack of time and organizational support. Acute care health professionals faced statistically significant more structural barriers (55.1% vs 21.4% lack of time, 47.8% vs 25.9% lack of organizational support) and felt insufficiently trained (38.4% vs 20.7%) compared to mental health professionals ( p ⩽ 0.05). Nurses provided more immediate services compared to physicians, such as viewing the deceased (71.3% vs 49.0%) and sending sympathy cards (37.4% vs 16.3%) ( p ⩽ 0.01). In contrast, physicians screened more often for complex bereavement disorders (10.2% vs 2.6%) and appraised bereavement care as beyond their role (26.5% vs 7.8%) ( p ⩽ 0.05). Conclusion: The study indicates that many barriers to bereavement care exist in hospitals. More research is required to better understand enabling and limiting factors to bereavement care provision. A guideline-driven approach to hospital-based bereavement care that defines best practice and required organizational support seems necessary to ensure needs-based bereavement care.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269216319891070

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 29

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Victorian Order of Nurses, 2012, Evidence-based bereavement care: a primer of interventions towards health system change
  2. Relf M, 2010, Guidance for bereavement needs assessment in palliative care
  3. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE), 2004, Guidance on cancer services: improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer: the manual

Metadata

Authors
Naef, R., Peng-Keller, S., Rettke, H., Rufer, M., & Petry, H.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Zurich (CH)
  • Faculty of Theology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Naef, Rahel
Venue
Palliative Medicine
Published
2019-12-23
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
547-552
ISSN
  • 0269-2163 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-030X
OpenAlex
W2996450640
Cited by
29
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
Professorship for Spiritual Care, University of Zurich
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
bereaved families, in-hospital mortality, end-of-life care, health professionals' practices, nurses, physicians, organizational support, training needs, acute care hospitals, psychiatric hospitals
MeSH terms
Bereavement, Cross-Sectional Studies, Family, Health Personnel, Hospitals, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Switzerland, Hospice Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review