The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Hospital-based bereavement care provision: A cross-sectional survey with health professionals
Open accessAbstract
Background: An in-hospital death is a profound experience for those left behind and has been associated with family members’ psychological morbidity. Supporting bereaved family members is an essential part of end-of-life care and includes attentive presence, information-giving, and emotional and practical support. The actual adoption of hospital-based bereavement care, however, remains little understood. Aim: To investigate hospital-based bereavement care provision and associated barriers. Design: Cross-sectional survey using an online questionnaire. Setting/participants: Health professionals ( n = 196) from two University-affiliated acute and psychiatric hospitals in Switzerland. Results: The most frequent bereavement services (⩾40%) were viewing the deceased, giving information on available support, and making referrals; the most often named barriers were lack of time and organizational support. Acute care health professionals faced statistically significant more structural barriers (55.1% vs 21.4% lack of time, 47.8% vs 25.9% lack of organizational support) and felt insufficiently trained (38.4% vs 20.7%) compared to mental health professionals ( p ⩽ 0.05). Nurses provided more immediate services compared to physicians, such as viewing the deceased (71.3% vs 49.0%) and sending sympathy cards (37.4% vs 16.3%) ( p ⩽ 0.01). In contrast, physicians screened more often for complex bereavement disorders (10.2% vs 2.6%) and appraised bereavement care as beyond their role (26.5% vs 7.8%) ( p ⩽ 0.05). Conclusion: The study indicates that many barriers to bereavement care exist in hospitals. More research is required to better understand enabling and limiting factors to bereavement care provision. A guideline-driven approach to hospital-based bereavement care that defines best practice and required organizational support seems necessary to ensure needs-based bereavement care.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lack of adequate training in grief counselling and perinatal bereavement care compounds the issue.
“The lack of adequate training in grief counselling and perinatal bereavement care further compounds this issue (Naef et al., 2020).”
From Nurses' and midwives' experiences of supporting parents following perinatal bereavement: A qualitative systematic review (2026) · cites this paper as Naef et al., 2020
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 29
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Victorian Order of Nurses, 2012, Evidence-based bereavement care: a primer of interventions towards health system change
- Relf M, 2010, Guidance for bereavement needs assessment in palliative care
- National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE), 2004, Guidance on cancer services: improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer: the manual
Metadata
- Authors
- Naef, R., Peng-Keller, S., Rettke, H., Rufer, M., & Petry, H.
- Affiliations
- University Hospital Zurich (CH)
- Faculty of Theology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Naef, Rahel
- Venue
- Palliative Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-12-23
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 547-552
- ISSN
- 0269-2163 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-030X
- OpenAlex
- W2996450640
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 2.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Funders
- Professorship for Spiritual Care, University of Zurich
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Keywords
- bereaved families, in-hospital mortality, end-of-life care, health professionals' practices, nurses, physicians, organizational support, training needs, acute care hospitals, psychiatric hospitals
- MeSH terms
- Bereavement, Cross-Sectional Studies, Family, Health Personnel, Hospitals, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Switzerland, Hospice Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review