Investigation of the effects of solid lipid curcumin on cognition and mood in a healthy older population
Abstract
Curcumin possesses many properties which may prevent or ameliorate pathological processes underlying age-related cognitive decline, dementia or mood disorders. These benefits in preclinical studies have not been established in humans. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial examined the acute (1 and 3 h after a single dose), chronic (4 weeks) and acute-on-chronic (1 and 3 h after single dose following chronic treatment) effects of solid lipid curcumin formulation (400 mg as Longvida®) on cognitive function, mood and blood biomarkers in 60 healthy adults aged 60–85. One hour after administration curcumin significantly improved performance on sustained attention and working memory tasks, compared with placebo. Working memory and mood (general fatigue and change in state calmness, contentedness and fatigue induced by psychological stress) were significantly better following chronic treatment. A significant acute-on-chronic treatment effect on alertness and contentedness was also observed. Curcumin was associated with significantly reduced total and LDL cholesterol and had no effect on hematological safety measures. To our knowledge this is the first study to examine the effects of curcumin on cognition and mood in a healthy older population or to examine any acute behavioral effects in humans. Results highlight the need for further investigation of the potential psychological and cognitive benefits of curcumin in an older population.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Acute curcumin administration improved performance on tasks that measured sustained attention and working memory, whereas chronic treatment also improved mood and fatigue.
“Acute curcumin administration improved performance on tasks that measured sustained attention and working memory, whereas chronic treatment also improved mood and fatigue [164].”
From Cognitive remission: a novel objective for the treatment of major depression? (2016) · cites this paper as [164]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 90 · Cited by 368
- Authors
- Cox, K. H., Pipingas, A., & Scholey, A. B.
- Affiliations
- Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Scholey, Andrew B
- Venue
- Journal of Psychopharmacology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-10-02
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 642-651
- ISSN
- 0269-8811 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7285
- OpenAlex
- W2023044236
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 90
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 8
- FWCI
- 8.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Curcumin's Biomedical Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Saffron Plant Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- curcumin, cognitive function, mood, older adults, age-related cognitive decline, working memory, sustained attention, fatigue, psychological stress, cholesterol, blood biomarkers
- MeSH terms
- Affect, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attention, Cognition, Curcumin, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review