Cited by 368Curcumin's Biomedical ApplicationsSaffron Plant Research StudiesDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Investigation of the effects of solid lipid curcumin on cognition and mood in a healthy older population

Cox, Katherine HM, Pipingas, Andrew, Scholey, Andrew B·2015·Journal of Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Curcumin possesses many properties which may prevent or ameliorate pathological processes underlying age-related cognitive decline, dementia or mood disorders. These benefits in preclinical studies have not been established in humans. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial examined the acute (1 and 3 h after a single dose), chronic (4 weeks) and acute-on-chronic (1 and 3 h after single dose following chronic treatment) effects of solid lipid curcumin formulation (400 mg as Longvida®) on cognitive function, mood and blood biomarkers in 60 healthy adults aged 60–85. One hour after administration curcumin significantly improved performance on sustained attention and working memory tasks, compared with placebo. Working memory and mood (general fatigue and change in state calmness, contentedness and fatigue induced by psychological stress) were significantly better following chronic treatment. A significant acute-on-chronic treatment effect on alertness and contentedness was also observed. Curcumin was associated with significantly reduced total and LDL cholesterol and had no effect on hematological safety measures. To our knowledge this is the first study to examine the effects of curcumin on cognition and mood in a healthy older population or to examine any acute behavioral effects in humans. Results highlight the need for further investigation of the potential psychological and cognitive benefits of curcumin in an older population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269881114552744

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Acute curcumin administration improved performance on tasks that measured sustained attention and working memory, whereas chronic treatment also improved mood and fatigue.

    “Acute curcumin administration improved performance on tasks that measured sustained attention and working memory, whereas chronic treatment also improved mood and fatigue [164].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 90 · Cited by 368

Authors
Cox, K. H., Pipingas, A., & Scholey, A. B.
Affiliations
Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Scholey, Andrew B
Venue
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Published
2014-10-02
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
642-651
ISSN
  • 0269-8811 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7285
OpenAlex
W2023044236
Cited by
368
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 8
FWCI
8.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Curcumin's Biomedical Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Saffron Plant Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
curcumin, cognitive function, mood, older adults, age-related cognitive decline, working memory, sustained attention, fatigue, psychological stress, cholesterol, blood biomarkers
MeSH terms
Affect, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attention, Cognition, Curcumin, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review