Cited by 14High Altitude and HypoxiaNitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

Dietary nitrate supplementation effect on dynamic cerebral autoregulation in normoxia and acute hypoxia

Open access
Horiuchi, Masahiro, Rossetti, Gabriella MK, Oliver, Samuel J·2022·Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that increasing the nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability by dietary nitrate would recover the hypoxia-induced reduction in dynamic cerebral autoregulation (CA). Twelve healthy males (age 21 ± 2 years) completed four days of dietary supplementation with a placebo or inorganic nitrate drink (140-ml beetroot juice per day) followed by 60-min of normoxia or hypoxia (fraction of inspired oxygen [FiO 2 ] = 13%). Duplex ultrasonography was used to perform volumetric change-based assessment of dynamic CA in the internal carotid artery (ICA). Dynamic CA was assessed by rate of regulation (RoR) of vascular conductance using the thigh-cuff method. Four days of beetroot supplementation increased circulating nitrate by 208 [171,245] μM (mean difference [95% confidence interval]) compared with placebo. Dynamic CA was lower in hypoxia than normoxia (RoR Δ−0.085 [−0.116, −0.054]). Compared with placebo, nitrate did not alter dynamic CA in normoxia (RoR Δ−0.022 [−0.060, 0.016]) or hypoxia (RoR Δ0.017 [−0.019, 0.053]). Further, nitrate did not affect ICA vessel diameter, blood velocity or flow in either normoxia or hypoxia. Increased bioavailability of NO through dietary nitrate supplementation did not recover the hypoxia-induced reduction in dynamic CA. This suggests the mechanism of hypoxia-induced reduction in dynamic CA does not relate to the availability of NO.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0271678x20910053

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 14

Authors
Horiuchi, M., Rossetti, G. M., & Oliver, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Mount Fuji Research Institute (JP)
  • Bangor University (GB)
Corresponding author
Horiuchi, Masahiro
Venue
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
Published
2020-03-09
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
486-494
ISSN
  • 0271-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-7016
OpenAlex
W3011915838
Cited by
14
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (acceptedVersion)
  • Bangor University Research Portal (Bangor University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › High Altitude and Hypoxia
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Keywords
dietary nitrate, beetroot juice, nitric oxide bioavailability, dynamic cerebral autoregulation, acute hypoxia, normoxia, internal carotid artery, vascular conductance, cerebral blood flow
MeSH terms
Fruit and Vegetable Juices, Hypoxia, Brain, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Hemodynamics, Homeostasis, Humans, Male, Nitrates, Nitrogen Oxides, Dietary Supplements, Beta vulgaris, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review