Cited by 56Community Health and DevelopmentHealthcare Systems and PracticesPublic Health Policies and Education

Community Involvement in Health Systems Strengthening to Improve Global Health Outcomes: A Review of Guidelines and Potential Roles

Sacks, Emma, Swanson, Robert C., Schensul, Jean J., Gleave, Anna, Shelley, Katharine D., Were, Miriam K., Chowdhury, A. Mushtaque, LeBan, Karen +1 more·2017·International Quarterly of Community Health Education

Abstract

Definitions of health systems strengthening (HSS) have been limited in their inclusion of communities, despite evidence that community involvement improves program effectiveness for many health interventions. We review 15 frameworks for HSS, highlighting how communities are represented and find few delineated roles for community members or organizations. This review raises the need for a cohesive definition of community involvement in HSS and well-described activities that communities can play in the process. We discuss how communities can engage with HSS in four different areas—planning and priority-setting; program implementation; monitoring, evaluation, and quality improvement; and advocacy—and how these activities could be better incorporated into key HSS frameworks. We argue for more carefully designed interactions between health systems policies and structures, planned health systems improvements, and local communities. These interactions should consider local community inputs, strengths, cultural and social assets, as well as limitations in and opportunities for increasing capacity for better health outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0272684x17738089

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 56

Authors
Sacks, E., Swanson, R. C., Schensul, J. J., Gleave, A., Shelley, K. D., Were, M. K., Chowdhury, A. M., LeBan, K., & Perry, H. B.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Utah Valley Regional Medical Center (US)
  • Institute For Community Research (US)
  • Moi University (KE)
  • BRAC, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • United States Agency for International Development (US)
Corresponding author
Sacks, Emma
Venue
International Quarterly of Community Health Education
Published
2017-07
Volume
37
Issue
3-4
Pages
139-149
ISSN
  • 0272-684X (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-3519
OpenAlex
W2765420510
Cited by
56
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Quarterly of Community Health Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
health system strengthening, community participation, health policy, program implementation, monitoring and evaluation, quality improvement, health advocacy, community capacity building
MeSH terms
Community Participation, Health Policy, Health Priorities, Humans, Global Health, Health Care Reform, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review