Community Involvement in Health Systems Strengthening to Improve Global Health Outcomes: A Review of Guidelines and Potential Roles
Abstract
Definitions of health systems strengthening (HSS) have been limited in their inclusion of communities, despite evidence that community involvement improves program effectiveness for many health interventions. We review 15 frameworks for HSS, highlighting how communities are represented and find few delineated roles for community members or organizations. This review raises the need for a cohesive definition of community involvement in HSS and well-described activities that communities can play in the process. We discuss how communities can engage with HSS in four different areas—planning and priority-setting; program implementation; monitoring, evaluation, and quality improvement; and advocacy—and how these activities could be better incorporated into key HSS frameworks. We argue for more carefully designed interactions between health systems policies and structures, planned health systems improvements, and local communities. These interactions should consider local community inputs, strengths, cultural and social assets, as well as limitations in and opportunities for increasing capacity for better health outcomes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The lack of inclusion of communities and community-based services in frameworks for health systems strengthening is striking.
“The lack of inclusion of communities and community-based services in frameworks for health systems strengthening is striking [100].”
From Community health workers at the dawn of a new era: 11. CHWs leading the way to “Health for All” (2021) · cites this paper as [100]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 56
- Authors
- Sacks, E., Swanson, R. C., Schensul, J. J., Gleave, A., Shelley, K. D., Were, M. K., Chowdhury, A. M., LeBan, K., & Perry, H. B.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Utah Valley Regional Medical Center (US)
- Institute For Community Research (US)
- Moi University (KE)
- BRAC, Dhaka, Bangladesh
- United States Agency for International Development (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sacks, Emma
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Quarterly of Community Health Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 139-149
- ISSN
- 0272-684X (ISSN-L)
- 1541-3519
- OpenAlex
- W2765420510
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 0.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Quarterly of Community Health Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Johns Hopkins University
- School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Practices
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
- Keywords
- health system strengthening, community participation, health policy, program implementation, monitoring and evaluation, quality improvement, health advocacy, community capacity building
- MeSH terms
- Community Participation, Health Policy, Health Priorities, Humans, Global Health, Health Care Reform, Quality Improvement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review