Cited by 174Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeProbability and Statistical Research

Estimation of Markov Chain Transition Probabilities and Rates from Fully and Partially Observed Data: Uncertainty Propagation, Evidence Synthesis, and Model Calibration

Welton, Nicky J., Ades, A. E.·2005·Medical Decision Making

Abstract

Markov transition models are frequently used to model disease progression. The authors show how the solution to Kolmogorov’s forward equations can be exploited to map between transition rates and probabilities from probability data in multistate models. They provide a uniform, Bayesian treatment of estimation and propagation of uncertainty of transition rates and probabilities when 1) observations are available on all transitions and exact time at risk in each state (fully observed data) and 2) observations are on initial state and final state after a fixed interval of time but not on the sequence of transitions (partially observed data). The authors show how underlying transition rates can be recovered from partially observed data using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods in WinBUGS, and they suggest diagnostics to investigate inconsistencies between evidence from different starting states. An illustrative example for a 3-state model is given, which shows how the methods extend to more complex Markov models using the software WBDiff to compute solutions. Finally, the authors illustrate how to statistically combine data from multiple sources, including partially observed data at several follow-up times and also how to calibrate a Markov model to be consistent with data from one specific study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0272989x05282637

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a real-world CEA, parameters are estimated from electronic health records, clinical trials, and observational studies, and when there is no individual-level data to inform them, through model calibration.

    “However, in a real-world CEA, parameters are estimated from electronic health records,33 clinical trials, and observational studies, and when there is no individual-level data to inform them, through model calibration.34”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 50 · Cited by 174

Authors
Welton, N. J., & Ades, A. E.
Affiliations
Medical Research Council (GB)
Corresponding author
Welton, Nicky J.
Venue
Medical Decision Making
Published
2005-11
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
633-645
ISSN
  • 0272-989X (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-681X
OpenAlex
W2158719122
Cited by
174
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Decision Making (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Bristol
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
Keywords
Markov transition probabilities, transition rates, multi-state models, disease progression modeling, Fokker-Planck equation, partially observed data, error propagation, Bayesian estimation, evidence synthesis, model calibration, Markov chain Monte Carlo, WinBUGS
MeSH terms
Calibration, Humans, Markov Chains, Models, Theoretical, Probability, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review