The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Calibration of Risk Prediction Models: Impact on Decision-Analytic Performance
Open accessAbstract
Decision-analytic measures to assess clinical utility of prediction models and diagnostic tests incorporate the relative clinical consequences of true and false positives without the need for external information such as monetary costs. Net Benefit is a commonly used metric that weights the relative consequences in terms of the risk threshold at which a patient would opt for treatment. Theoretical results demonstrate that clinical utility is affected by a model';s calibration, the extent to which estimated risks correspond to observed event rates. We analyzed the effects of different types of miscalibration on Net Benefit and investigated whether and under what circumstances miscalibration can make a model clinically harmful. Clinical harm is defined as a lower Net Benefit compared with classifying all patients as positive or negative by default. We used simulated data to investigate the effect of overestimation, underestimation, overfitting (estimated risks too extreme), and underfitting (estimated risks too close to baseline risk) on Net Benefit for different choices of the risk threshold. In accordance with theory, we observed that miscalibration always reduced Net Benefit. Harm was sometimes observed when models underestimated risk at a threshold below the event rate (as in underestimation and overfitting) or overestimated risk at a threshold above event rate (as in overestimation and overfitting). Underfitting never resulted in a harmful model. The impact of miscalibration decreased with increasing discrimination. Net Benefit was less sensitive to miscalibration for risk thresholds close to the event rate than for other thresholds. We illustrate these findings with examples from the literature and with a case study on testicular cancer diagnosis. Our findings strengthen the importance of obtaining calibrated risk models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In contrast to net benefit, expected cost searches for the decision threshold that minimises cost given the misclassification costs.”
From Evaluation of performance measures in predictive artificial intelligence models to support medical decisions: overview and guidance (2025) · cites this paper as [89]
In the citing paper
“Miscalibration of the model might thus be reflected in the decision threshold at which expected cost is minimised, whereas net benefit fi xes the threshold such that miscalibration reduces the net benefit value.”
From Evaluation of performance measures in predictive artificial intelligence models to support medical decisions: overview and guidance (2025) · cites this paper as [89]
In the citing paper
“Miscalibration can compromise predictive AI application by leading to systematic overtreatment or undertreatment.”
From Evaluation of performance measures in predictive artificial intelligence models to support medical decisions: overview and guidance (2025) · cites this paper as [89]
In the citing paper
“Previous work has shown that miscalibration decreases clinical utility compared to moderate calibration [18].”
From A calibration hierarchy for risk models was defined: from utopia to empirical data (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“it is an important observation that calibration in a weak sense may still result in harmful decisionmaking [18].”
From A calibration hierarchy for risk models was defined: from utopia to empirical data (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“This suggests that moderate calibration prevents the model from becoming harmful [18] but that strong calibration may further enhance the model's clinical utility.”
From A calibration hierarchy for risk models was defined: from utopia to empirical data (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pencina, M. J., D' Agostino, R. B., D' Agostino, R. B., & Vasan, R. S. (2008) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.2929 · Cited by 6,493
Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models
Vickers, A. J., & Elkin, E. B. (2006) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x06295361 · Cited by 6,341
Clinical Prediction Models: A Practical Approach to Development, Validation, and Updating
Steyerberg, E. W. (2019) · Statistics for Biology and Health · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-16399-0 · Cited by 3,281
Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers
Pencina, M. J., D’Agostino, R. B., & Steyerberg, E. W. (2010) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4085 · Cited by 2,483
Steyerberg, E. W. (2009) · Statistics for Biology and Health · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-77244-8 · Cited by 1,491
Criteria for Evaluation of Novel Markers of Cardiovascular Risk
Hlatky, M. A., Greenland, P., Arnett, D. K., Ballantyne, C. M., Criqui, M. H., Elkind, M. S. V., Go, A. S., Harrell, F. E., Hong, Y., Howard, B. V., et al. (2009) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.109.192278 · Cited by 1,146
Reporting and Methods in Clinical Prediction Research: A Systematic Review
Bouwmeester, W., Zuithoff, N. P. A., Mallett, S., Geerlings, M. I., Vergouwe, Y., Steyerberg, E. W., Altman, D. G., & Moons, K. G. M. (2012) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001221 · Cited by 600
Two further applications of a model for binary regression
COX, D. R. (1958) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/45.3-4.562 · Cited by 556
Therapeutic decision making: a cost-benefit analysis
Pauker, S. G., & Kassirer, J. P. (1975) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197507312930505 · Cited by 507
Austin, P. C., & Steyerberg, E. W. (2014) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.5941 · Cited by 362
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Vickers AJ, 2010, Semin Oncol, 76, 1298
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 371
Ogero, M. O., Ndiritu, J., Sarguta, R. J., Tuti, T., Aluvaala, J., & Akech, S. (2023) · Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology · doi:10.1111/ppe.12948 · Cited by 7
Yang, B., Fu, L., Xu, S., Xiao, J., Li, Z., & Liu, Y. (2019) · The International Journal of Biological Markers · doi:10.1177/1724600819865745 · Cited by 7
Development and evaluation of predictive models for pregnancy risk in UK dairy cows
Barden, M., Hyde, R., Green, M. J., Bradley, A., Can, E., Clifton, R., Lewis, K., Manning, A., & O’Grady, L. (2024) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2023-24623 · Cited by 7
Durmaz, E. Ş., Karabacak, M., Ozkara, B. B., Kargın, O. A., Demir, B., Raimoglou, D., Aygun, A. A., Adaletli, İ., Baş, A., & Durmaz, E. (2024) · Acta Radiologica · doi:10.1177/02841851241283041 · Cited by 7
How the Intended Use of Polygenic Risk Scores Guides the Design and Evaluation of Prediction Studies
Martens, F. K., & Janssens, A. C. J. W. (2019) · Current Epidemiology Reports · doi:10.1007/s40471-019-00203-7 · Cited by 6
Li, C., Ren, Z., Han, D., Wang, H., Xu, F., Zheng, S., & Lyu, J. (2020) · Translational Cancer Research · doi:10.21037/tcr-19-2962 · Cited by 6
Du, Q., Wang, Y., Guan, S., Hu, C., Li, M., Zhou, L., Zhang, M., Chen, Y., Mei, X., Sun, J., et al. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-55563-3 · Cited by 6
RetractedMeid, A. D., González‐González, A. I., Dinh, T. S., Blom, J. W., van den Akker, M., Elders, P. J. M., Thiem, U., de Gaudry, D. K., Swart, K. M. A., Rudolf, H., et al. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045572 · Cited by 6
“…being eligible if they were aged 60 years or older, had been diagnosed with at least one chronic condition defined using the O'Halloran list, 39 and had at least one chronic prescription at study baseline ( ≤ 2 weeks duration in PRIMUM, ≤ 2 months in ISCOPE and ≤ 3 months in Opti-Med and RIME).”
BackgroundMethodChen, Z., Wang, Y., Lan, X., Yang, M., Ding, L., Li, G., Hong, P., Bai, Y., Liu, Y., & Li, W. (2021) · European Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1684/ejd.2021.4095 · Cited by 6
Calculating Probability in Sex Offender Risk Assessment
Elwood, R. W. (2016) · International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology · doi:10.1177/0306624x16677784 · Cited by 8
Seo, S. M., & Jeong, I. S. (2020) · Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing · doi:10.4040/jkan.20137 · Cited by 6
Xu, R., Cui, J., Liu, H., Wang, Y., Wang, T., Ye, D., Lv, Y., & Liu, Q. (2020) · Journal of Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/jmv.26551 · Cited by 6
Hu, A., Chen, Z., Liu, C., Gao, Y., Deng, C., & Liu, X. (2022) · Cancer Control · doi:10.1177/10732748221141560 · Cited by 6
Non‐parametric inference on calibration of predicted risks
Sadatsafavi, M., & Petkau, J. (2024) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.10138 · Cited by 5
Vickers, A. J., Hollingsworth, A., Bozzo, A., Chatterjee, A., & Chatterjee, S. (2025) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105844 · Cited by 5
Yusufujiang, M., Navarro, C. L. A., Damen, J. A., Takada, T., Geersing, G., Hooft, L., Schuit, E., Moons, K. G. M., de Jong, V. M. T., & van Smeden, M. (2026) · Diagnostic and Prognostic Research · doi:10.1186/s41512-025-00216-5 · Cited by 5
Gorodetski, B., Becker, P., Baur, A., Hartenstein, A., Rogasch, J., Furth, C., Amthauer, H., Hamm, B., Makowski, M., & Penzkofer, T. (2022) · European Radiology Experimental · doi:10.1186/s41747-022-00296-8 · Cited by 4
Development of an Injury Burden Prediction Model in Professional Baseball Pitchers
Bullock, G. S., Thigpen, C. A., Collins, P. G. S., Arden, N., Noonan, T. J., Kissenberth, M. J., & Shanley, E. (2022) · International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.26603/001c.39741 · Cited by 5
Oosterhoff, J. H. F., Karhade, A. V., Groot, O. Q., Schwab, J. H., Heng, M. M., Klang, E., & Prat, D. (2023) · European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00068-023-02237-5 · Cited by 5
Marciano, S., Piano, S. S., Singh, V., Caraceni, P., Maiwall, R., Alessandria, C., Fernández, J., Kim, D. J., Kim, S. E., Soares, E. C., et al. (2024) · Liver International · doi:10.1111/liv.16063 · Cited by 6
Alsoud, D., Sabino, J., Ferrante, M., Verstockt, B., & Vermeire, S. (2024) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2024.09.020 · Cited by 6
Prognostic models for COVID-19 needed updating to warrant transportability over time and space
van Klaveren, D., Zanos, T. P., Nelson, J., Levy, T. J., Park, J. G., Retel Helmrich, I. R. A., Rietjens, J. A. C., Basile, M. J., Hajizadeh, N., Lingsma, H. F., et al. (2022) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-022-02651-3 · Cited by 5
Krivicich, L. M., Jan, K., Kunze, K. N., Rice, M. W., & Nho, S. J. (2023) · HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · doi:10.1177/15563316231164138 · Cited by 5
Nomqupu, S., Sali, A., Nyamugama, A., & Ndou, N. N. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app14072670 · Cited by 5
“Uncalibrated models tend to either underestimate or overestimate the probability of outcomes [24], subsequently making insignificant decisions regarding pothole size.”
BackgroundWei, C., Cao, H., Huang, L., & Feng, L.-H. (2024) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2024.1474311 · Cited by 5
Feng, J., Zheng, F., Liu, S., Qi, G.-F., Ye, X., Ye, J., & Jiang, Y. (2024) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2024.10.001 · Cited by 5
Les nomogrammes dans la pratique clinique : méthodologie, limites et intérêts
Filleron, T., Chaltiel, L., Jouve, E., Cabarrou, B., Gilhodes, J., Lusque, A., Mery-Lamarche, E., Dalenc, F., & Martínez, A. (2017) · Bulletin du Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bulcan.2017.10.024 · Cited by 7
Prognostic model for predicting survival in very preterm infants: an external validation study
van Beek, P. E., Groenendaal, F., Onland, W., Koole, S., Dijk, P. H., Dijkman, K. P., van den Dungen, F., van Heijst, A., Kornelisse, R. F., Schuerman, F., et al. (2021) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.17010 · Cited by 5
Fu, J., Tu, M., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Zeng, Z., Li, J., & Zeng, F. (2022) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.13196 · Cited by 5
Decision Curves and Relative Utility Curves
Baker, S. G. (2019) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x19850762 · Cited by 5
Adapting a Risk Prediction Tool for Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome
Reese, T. J., Wiese, A. D., Leech, A. A., Domenico, H. J., McNeer, E. A., Davis, S. E., Matheny, M. E., Wright, A. T., & Patrick, S. W. (2025) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2024-068673 · Cited by 4
Li, Y., Chung, F.-L., Nojima, Y., & Wang, S. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2025.3600911 · Cited by 4
Clustered flexible calibration plots for binary outcomes using random effects modeling
Barreñada, L., Cock, B. D., Wynants, L., & CALSTER, B. V. (2025) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1017/rsm.2025.10046 · Cited by 5
Li, Y., Chen, P., & Gao, B. (2025) · Lipids in Health and Disease · doi:10.1186/s12944-025-02820-2 · Cited by 5
Ahmed, R. S., & Shaban, M. (2026) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2026.107923 · Cited by 4
Calibration-informed metrics for instance-level predictive reliability in medical AI
Cabitza, F. (2026) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2026.103366 · Cited by 5
A novel nomogram to predict psoriatic arthritis in patients with plaque psoriasis
Tan, M., Chen, J., Cheng, J., Hu, J., Hu, K., Yang, J. X., Li, X., Zhang, M., Zhu, W., Liao, L., et al. (2024) · JDDG Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft · doi:10.1111/ddg.15446 · Cited by 4
TripleSurv: Triplet Time-Adaptive Coordinate Learning Approach for Survival Analysis
Zhang, L., Zhong, L., Yang, F., Tang, L., Dong, D., Hui, H., & Tian, J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2024.3450910 · Cited by 4
Vernooij, J. E. M., Roovers, L., van der Zwan, R., Preckel, B., Kalkman, C. J., & Koning, N. J. (2024) · BMC Anesthesiology · doi:10.1186/s12871-024-02771-8 · Cited by 4
Hierarchical Bayesian models to mitigate systematic disparities in prediction with proxy outcomes
Mikhaeil, J. M., Gelman, A., & Greengard, P. (2024) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.1093/jrsssa/qnae142 · Cited by 4
Artificial Intelligence in Nuclear Cardiology
Miller, R. J. H. (2025) · Heart Failure Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.hfc.2025.01.015 · Cited by 4
AI in Healthcare: Bridging the Gap between Research and Clinical Implementation
Lanka, S., & Madala, P. (2024) · International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) · doi:10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24oct089 · Cited by 5
A novel model with nutrition-related parameters for predicting overall survival of cancer patients
Zhang, Q., Zhang, K., Li, X., Zhang, X., Song, M., Liu, T., Song, C., Barazzoni, R., Wang, K., Xu, H., et al. (2021) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-021-06272-z · Cited by 4
Zhou, L., Liang, S., Qin, S., Fan, C., Gao, L., & Cai, W. (2022) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.13388 · Cited by 4
Cabitza, F., Campagner, A., & Famiglini, L. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-14463-9_6 · Cited by 4
Xu, Y.-Z., Foryciarz, A., Steinberg, E., & Shah, N. (2022) · J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc. · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocad017 · Cited by 3
Qiao, W., Wang, Q., Mei, T., Wang, Q., Wang, W. J., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Surgery · doi:10.3389/fsurg.2023.1045213 · Cited by 4
Wang, Y., Bai, G., Huang, W. J., Zhang, H., & Chen, W. (2023) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1208756 · Cited by 4
Moons, E. G. M., Altman, D. G., Reitsma, J. B., Macaskill, P., Steyerberg, E. W., Vickers, A. J., Ransohoff, D. F., & Collins, P. G. S. (2015) · Cited by 4
Development and validation of ischemia risk scores
Miller, R. J. H., Rozanski, A., Slomka, P. J., Han, D., Gransar, H., Hayes, S. W., Friedman, J. D., Thomson, L., & Berman, D. S. (2022) · Journal of Nuclear Cardiology · doi:10.1007/s12350-022-02976-9 · Cited by 4
Validación del índice de salud prostática en un modelo predictivo de cáncer de próstata
Bonet, A., Barrionuevo-González, M., Bajo, A. M., Pulido-Fonseca, L., Polledo, L. E. O., Ruíz, J. C. T., & Sánchez‐Chapado, M. (2017) · Actas Urológicas Españolas · doi:10.1016/j.acuro.2017.06.003 · Cited by 4
Verbeek, J. F. M., Nieboer, D., Steyerberg, E. W., & Roobol, M. J. (2019) · European Urology Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.euo.2019.07.012 · Cited by 4
van Maurik, I. S., Doodeman, H. J., Nuijens, B. W., Möhringer, R. P. M., Sudiono, D. R., Jongbloed, W., & van Soelen, E. (2024) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/57035 · Cited by 3
Classification and predictive models using supervised machine learning: A conceptual review
Pienaar, M. A., & Naidoo, K. D. (2025) · Southern African Journal of Critical Care · doi:10.7196/sajcc.2025.v411.2937 · Cited by 5
“[27,35,36] Depending on the size of the data, this is achieved by breaking up the data into bands of predicted probability called bins.”
Prospective prediction of first onset of major depressive disorder in midlife using machine learning
Massell, J., Preisig, M., Miché, M., Strippoli, M. F., Pistis, G., & Lieb, R. (2025) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-025-02942-z · Cited by 4
Wang, Z., Zhang, H., Li, Y., Zhang, X., Liu, J., Ren, Z., Daping, Q., & Xiyun, Z. (2025) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-025-09102-6 · Cited by 3
Song, S., Ge, W., Qi, X., Che, X., Wang, Q., & Wu, G. (2025) · BMC Medical Imaging · doi:10.1186/s12880-025-01749-3 · Cited by 3
Bailey, S. L., Bono, R. S., Nash, D., & Kimmel, A. D. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194916 · Cited by 3
Куценко, И. И., Олегович, Б. И., Сергеевич, М. А., Bulgakova, V. P., & Borovikova, O. I. (2023) · Кубанский научный медицинский вестник · doi:10.25207/1608-6228-2023-30-1-26-36 · Cited by 3
Zuo, H., & Li, M. (2023) · Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s00432-023-05363-0 · Cited by 3
Liang, S., Huang, S., Andarini, E., Wang, Y., Li, Y., & Cai, W. (2023) · Neurourology and Urodynamics · doi:10.1002/nau.25364 · Cited by 3
“14 In addition to calibration, the predictive ability of the model was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve and box plots.”
MethodMiché, M., Strippoli, M. F., Preisig, M., & Lieb, R. (2024) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-024-05647-w · Cited by 3
Abu-Assi, E., Castro, A. L., Fernández, M. C., Bermúdez, I. G., & Roubín, S. R. (2024) · International Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132018 · Cited by 3
Nomogram for Predicting Risk of Digestive Carcinoma Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
Feng, L.-H., Bu, K., Ren, S., Yang, Z., Bixun, L., & Deng, C.-E. (2020) · Diabetes Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity · doi:10.2147/dmso.s251063 · Cited by 3
Biomarker Evaluation and Clinical Development
Vickers, A. J., & Assel, M. J. (2020) · Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal · doi:10.48083/zcjs3811 · Cited by 3
Parsons, R. E., Colopy, G. W., Clifton, D. A., & Clifton, L. (2022) · Journal of Data Science · doi:10.6339/22-jds1037 · Cited by 3
Bullock, G. S., Thigpen, C. A., Collins, P. G. S., Arden, N., Noonan, T. K., Kissenberth, M. J., & Shanley, E. (2022) · International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.26603/001c.32380 · Cited by 3
Matheny, M. E., Lucila Ohno-machado, A., Davis, S. E., & Nemati, S. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-91200-6.00031-0 · Cited by 3
Calibration of Prognostic Risk Scores
CALSTER, B. V., & Steyerberg, E. W. (2018) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118445112.stat08078 · Cited by 3
Klemp, M., & Rein, R. (2025) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-025-02211-8 · Cited by 3
Importance of Transplant Era on Post–Heart Transplant Predictive Models: A UNOS Cohort Analysis
Lescroart, M., Kransdorf, E. P., Scuppa, M. F., Patel, J. K., & Coutance, G. (2024) · Clinical Transplantation · doi:10.1111/ctr.15403 · Cited by 2
Asaye, M. M., Matebe, Y. H., Lindgren, H. E., Erlandsson, K., & Gelaye, K. A. (2024) · Global Health Action · doi:10.1080/16549716.2024.2392354 · Cited by 2
Li, Y., Qu, L., Wang, J., Chen, P., Jiang, A.-S., & Liu, H. (2024) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2024.1488514 · Cited by 2
Adane, S. M., Teshale, A. B., Belay, D. G., & Nigatu, S. G. (2025) · Frontiers in Pediatrics · doi:10.3389/fped.2025.1496019 · Cited by 3
Benitez-Aurioles, J., Medina, C. R. R., Jenkins, D. A., Peek, N. B., & Jani, M. (2026) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0001190 · Cited by 4
Prognostic prediction models for psoriatic arthritis in psoriasis: A systematic review
Khoda, F., Khan, Y., Haw, W. Y., Nahar, S., Hodkinson, C., Chinoy, H., Warren, R. B., Martin, G. P., & Yiu, Z. Z. N. (2026) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.70561 · Cited by 2
A Closer Look at Probability Calibration of Knowledge Graph Embedding
Zhu, R., Wang, F., Bundy, A., Li, X., Nuamah, K., Xu, L., Mauceri, S., & Pan, J. Z. (2022) · International Joint Conference on Knowledge Graphs (IJCKG) · doi:10.1145/3579051.3579072 · Cited by 2
Li, M., Wu, H., Shou, C., Ye, P., Song, X., Wang, Y., Chen, Y., & Tong, X. (2024) · Discover Oncology · doi:10.1007/s12672-024-01254-z · Cited by 2
The mC2HEST Score for Incident Atrial Fibrillation
Li, Y., Li, Q., Wang, L., Zhang, T., Gao, H., Pastori, D., Liang, Z., Lip, G. Y. H., & Wang, Y. (2025) · JACC Advances · doi:10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101521 · Cited by 4
Impact of pectoral muscle removal on deep-learning-based breast cancer risk prediction
Klaneček, Ž., Wang, Y., Wagner, T., Cockmartin, L., Marshall, N., Schott, B., Deatsch, A. E., Studen, A., Jarm, K., Krajc, M., et al. (2025) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/adb367 · Cited by 2
Li, Y., Chung, F.-L., Nojima, Y., & Wang, S. (2025) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2025.122142 · Cited by 2
Sundar, S. S., Agarwal, R., Scandrett, K., Davenport, C. F., CALSTER, B. V., Johnson, S., Sengupta, P., Vikram, R., Kwong, F. L., Mallett, S., et al. (2026) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2024-083912 · Cited by 2
Update to living systematic review
Wynants, L., CALSTER, B. V., Collins, G., Riley, R. D., Heinze, G., Schuit, E., Albu, E., Arshi, B., Bellou, V., Bonten, M. J. M., et al. (2020) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.m2204 · Cited by 3
Re-calibrating Machine Learning Models Using Confidence Interval Bounds
Campagner, A., Famiglini, L., & Cabitza, F. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-13448-7_11 · Cited by 2
Lapi, F., Bianchini, E., Marconi, E., Medea, G., Piccinni, C. P., Maggioni, A. P., Dondi, L., Pedrini, A., Martini, N., & Cricelli, C. A. (2023) · Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety · doi:10.1002/pds.5641 · Cited by 2
Njoto, E. N., Kusumawardani, I. A. J. D., & Rai, I. B. N. (2023) · Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.31557/apjcp.2023.24.8.2903 · Cited by 2
How many longitudinal covariate measurements are needed for risk prediction?
Reinikainen, J., Karvanen, J., & Tolonen, H. K. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.022 · Cited by 2
Du, Q., Wang, Y., Guan, S., Hu, C., Li, M., Zhou, L., Zhang, M., Chen, Y., Mei, X., Sun, J., et al. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-73758-x · Cited by 2
RetractedFerraro, S., Rossi, R. S., & Biganzoli, E. M. (2021) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.33811 · Cited by 2
Alsoud, D., & CALSTER, B. V. (2024) · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · doi:10.1093/ibd/izae048 · Cited by 2
Yeramosu, T., Farrar, J. M., Malik, A., Satpathy, J., Golladay, G. J., & Patel, N. K. (2024) · The Journal of Arthroplasty · doi:10.1016/j.arth.2024.12.006 · Cited by 1
Simon, J. E., Kraiński, Ł., Karlinski, M. A., & Niewada, M. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14207327 · Cited by 1
Vreven, L. W. A., Verheul, E. M., van Maaren, M. C., Doornkamp, F., Schipper, R., Siesling, S., Pharoah, P. D. P., Tjan‐Heijnen, V. C. G., & Voogd, A. C. (2025) · The Breast · doi:10.1016/j.breast.2025.104681 · Cited by 1
Cao, F., Li, E., Ai, F., Wen, H., Tang, P., & Guo, B. (2026) · Psychology Health & Medicine · doi:10.1080/13548506.2025.2611359 · Cited by 1
Liao, T., Su, T., Yang, L., Zhou, X., Feng, L.-H., & Yang, Z. (2026) · Journal of International Medical Research · doi:10.1177/03000605261421028 · Cited by 1
Buhl, E., Kraaer, M. T., Kjeldsen, J., & Ainsworth, M. A. (2026) · Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1080/00365521.2026.2645095 · Cited by 1
Li, X., Song, S., Ge, W., Wang, H., Liu, W., Qi, X., & Zhao, Y. (2026) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-026-15794-w · Cited by 1
Peer review: historical evolution and reviewers’ learning
Gómez, M. P. A., & Sardanelli, F. (2026) · Insights into Imaging · doi:10.1186/s13244-026-02302-8 · Cited by 1
Wu, Z., Zhang, F., & Zhao, F. (2026) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-026-07656-8 · Cited by 1
Han, F., Liao, S., Wu, R., Liu, S., Zhao, Y., & Xie, Y. (2021) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn52387.2021.9534147 · Cited by 1
“Although such models with better discrimination and calibration performance would theoretically be a better guide to clinical management [16-18], statistical measures cannot inform us whether the risk model improves clinical decision making.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Calster, B., & Vickers, A. J.
- Affiliations
- KU Leuven, Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven, Belgium (BVC)
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- ORCID
- Vickers, Andrew J.
- Venue
- Medical Decision Making
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-08-25
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 162-169
- ISSN
- 0272-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1552-681X
- OpenAlex
- W2054193584
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 44 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 11.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Medical Decision Making (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- Vlaamse regering
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Keywords
- risk prediction model, model calibration, net benefit, clinical utility, calibration error, overfitting, underfitting, risk overestimation, risk underestimation, risk thresholds, model discrimination, testicular cancer diagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Computer Simulation, Decision Support Techniques, Humans, Male, Models, Theoretical, Norway, Predictive Value of Tests, ROC Curve, Testicular Neoplasms, Bias, Linear Models, Risk Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review