Applied Methods for Estimating Transition Probabilities from Electronic Health Record Data
Abstract
Background: Electronic health record (EHR) data contain longitudinal patient information and standardized diagnostic codes. EHR data may be useful for estimating transition probabilities for state-transition models, but no guidelines exist on appropriate methods. We applied 3 potential methods to estimate transition probabilities from EHR data, using pediatric eating disorders (EDs) as a case study. Methods: We obtained EHR data from PEDsnet, which includes 8 US children’s hospitals. Data included inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department visits for all patients with an ED. We mapped diagnoses to 3 ED health states: anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and other specified feeding or eating disorder. We estimated 1-y transition probabilities for males and females using 3 approaches: simple first-last proportions, a multistate Markov (MSM) model, and independent survival models. Results: Transition probability estimates varied widely between approaches. The first-last proportion approach estimated higher probabilities of remaining in the same health state, while the MSM and independent survival approaches estimated higher probabilities of transitioning to a different health state. All estimates differed substantially from published literature. Limitations: As a source of health state information, EHR data are incomplete and sometimes inaccurate. EHR data were especially challenging for EDs, limiting the estimation and interpretation of transition probabilities. Conclusions: The 3 approaches produced very different transition probability estimates. Estimates varied considerably from published literature and were rescaled and calibrated for use in a microsimulation model. Estimation of transition probabilities from EHR data may be more promising for diseases that are well documented in the EHR. Furthermore, clinicians and health systems should work to improve documentation of ED in the EHR. Further research is needed on methods for using EHR data to inform transition probabilities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a real-world CEA, parameters are estimated from electronic health records, clinical trials, and observational studies, and when there is no individual-level data to inform them, through model calibration.
“However, in a real-world CEA, parameters are estimated from electronic health records,33 clinical trials, and observational studies, and when there is no individual-level data to inform them, through model calibration.34”
From A Tutorial on Time-Dependent Cohort State-Transition Models in R Using a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Example (2023) · cites this paper as [33]
Cites
Mining electronic health records: towards better research applications and clinical care
Jensen, P. B., Jensen, L. J., & Brunak, S. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3208 · Cited by 1,680 · see citing works
Swanson, S. A., Crow, S. J., Le Grange, D., Swendsen, J., & Merikangas, K. R. (2011) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.22 · Cited by 1,611 · see citing works
Briggs, A. H., Weinstein, M. C., Fenwick, E. A. L., Karnon, J., Sculpher, M. J., & Paltiel, A. D. (2012) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.04.014 · Cited by 711 · see citing works
Hersh, W. R., Weiner, M. G., Embi, P. J., Logan, J. R., Payne, P. R. O., Bernstam, E. V., Lehmann, H. P., Hripcsak, G., Hartzog, T. H., Cimino, J. J., et al. (2013) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e31829b1dbd · Cited by 567 · see citing works
Diagnostic Crossover in Anorexia Nervosa and Bulimia Nervosa: Implications for DSM-V
Eddy, K. T., Dorer, D. J., Franko, D. L., Tahilani, K., Thompson-Brenner, H., & Herzog, D. B. (2008) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07060951 · Cited by 535 · see citing works
State-Transition Modeling: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force–3
Siebert, U., Alagoz, O., Bayoumi, A. M., Jahn, B., Owens, D. K., Cohen, D. J., & Kuntz, K. M. (2012) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x12455463 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Alarid-Escudero, F., Krijkamp, E., Enns, E. A., Yang, A., Hunink, M. G. M., Pechlivanoglou, P., & Jalal, H. (2023) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x221121747 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rodriguez, P. J., Ward, Z. J., Long, M. W., Austin, S. B., & Wright, D. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- George Washington University (US)
- Boston Children's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rodriguez, Patricia J.
- Venue
- Medical Decision Making
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 143-152
- ISSN
- 0272-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1552-681X
- OpenAlex
- W3127977606
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Decision Making (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (T32HS013853)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Keywords
- transition probabilities, electronic health records, eating disorders in children, state transition model, multi-state Markov model, survival models, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, health state mapping, EHR data quality
- MeSH terms
- Child, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Male, Probability, Electronic Health Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review