The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Net Health Benefits: A New Framework for the Analysis of Uncertainty in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Abstract
In recent years, considerable attention has been devoted to the development of sta tistical methods for the analysis of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness (CE) analysis, with a focus on situations in which the analyst has patient-level data on the costs and health effects of alternative interventions. To date, discussions have focused almost exclu sively on addressing the practical challenges involved in estimating confidence inter vals for CE ratios. However, the general approach of using confidence intervals to convey information about uncertainty around CE ratio estimates suffers from theoretical limitations that render it inappropriate in many situations. The authors present an al ternative framework for analyzing uncertainty in the economic evaluation of health interventions (the "net health benefits" approach) that is more broadly applicable and that avoids some problems of prior methods. This approach offers several practical and theoretical advantages over the analysis of CE ratios, is straightforward to apply, and highlights some important principles in the theoretical underpinnings of CE anal ysis. Key words: cost-effectiveness; net health benefits; uncertainty. (Med Decis Mak ing 1998;18 suppl:S68-S80)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- Manski CF, 1988, Analog Estimation Models in Econometrics
- Manning WG, 1996, Reflecting uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis, 10.1093/oso/9780195108248.003.0008 · DOI
- 10.1097/00005650-199402000-00006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9780511625817.008 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511625817.008
- 10.1002/hec.4730040503 · DOI
- Poirier DJ, 1995, Intermediate Statistics and Econometrics
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960715)15:13<1447::AID-SIM267>3.0.CO;2-V · DOI · Paper page
- Kelly AE, 1996, Cost-effectiveness of strategies to prevent neural tube defects, 10.1093/oso/9780195108248.005.0002 · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195108248.005.0002
- 10.2165/00019053-199711050-00008 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Davidson R., 1993, MacKinnon JG. Estimation and Inference in Econometrics
- Mullahy J., 1996, Med Care., 34, DS124
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199609)5:5<470::AID-HEC224>3.0.CO;2-5 · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199609)5:5<470::aid-hec224>3.0.co;2-5
- 10.1177/0272989X9701700414 · DOI
- Matchar DB, 1995, Med Decis Making., 15, 420
- 10.1016/S0197-2456(95)00259-6 · doi:10.1016/s0197-2456(95)00259-6
- Mullahy J., 1997, Which cost-effectiveness ratio? Using cost and effectiveness data to value medical technologies
- 10.1016/0167-6296(93)90005-Y · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0272989X9401400308 · DOI
- Comparative Benefits, 1992, Modeling Project. A framework for cost-utility analysis of government health care programs: a report to the Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, in cooperation with the Foundation for Health Services Research
- 10.1002/hec.4730030505 · DOI · Paper page
- Siegel JE, 1996, Reporting cost-effectiveness studies and results, 10.1093/oso/9780195108248.003.0009 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9781139167635 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-1-349-20568-4_34 · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-20568-4_34
- 10.1287/mnsc.28.6.698 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.28.6.698
- Kroll Y., 1980, Research in Finance., 2, 163
- 10.1016/0022-0531(70)90038-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0022-0531(71)90034-2 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199607)5:4<297::AID-HEC216>3.0.CO;2-T · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199607)5:4<297::aid-hec216>3.0.co;2-t
- Fieller EC, 1954, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 16, 175, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1954.tb00159.x · DOI · Paper page
- Weinstein MC, 1995, From cost-effectiveness ratios to resource allocation : where to draw the line
- 10.1016/S0167-6296(96)00493-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/09332480.1996.10555000 · doi:10.1080/09332480.1996.10555000
- 10.1017/S0266462300004803 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0167-6296(96)00506-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0167-6296(96)00507-3 · DOI · Paper page
- Mishan EJ, 1976, Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Pauly MV, 1995, Valuing health care benefits in monetary terms
Cited by
A simple, step-by-step guide to interpreting decision curve analysis
Vickers, A. J., van Calster, B., & Steyerberg, E. W. (2019) · Diagnostic and Prognostic Research · doi:10.1186/s41512-019-0064-7 · Cited by 1,174
Ramsey, S. D., Willke, R. J., Glick, H., Reed, S. D., Augustovski, F., Jonsson, B., Briggs, A., & Sullivan, S. D. (2015) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2015.02.001 · Cited by 811
Assessing cost-effectiveness in healthcare: history of the $50,000 per QALY threshold
Grosse, S. D. (2008) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1586/14737167.8.2.165 · Cited by 637
Richards, D. A., Ekers, D., McMillan, D., Taylor, R. S., Byford, S., Warren, F. C., Barrett, B., Farrand, P. A., Gilbody, S., Kuyken, W., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31140-0 · Cited by 595
Kuyken, W., Hayes, R., Barrett, B., Byng, R., Dalgleish, T., Kessler, D., Lewis, G., Watkins, E., Brejcha, C., Cardy, J., et al. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)62222-4 · Cited by 527
Metadata
- Authors
- Stinnett, A. A., & Mullahy, J.
- Venue
- Medical Decision Making
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2_suppl
- Pages
- S68-S80
- ISSN
- 0272-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1552-681X
- OpenAlex
- W3122426397
- Cited by
- 1,102
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 51.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Net Health Benefits: A New Framework for the Analysis of Uncertainty in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0272989x98018002s09
- The paper
- Stinnett, A. A., & Mullahy, J. (1998). Net Health Benefits: A New Framework for the Analysis of Uncertainty in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Medical Decision Making. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x98018002s09
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.