Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,102

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Net Health Benefits: A New Framework for the Analysis of Uncertainty in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Stinnett, Aaron A., Mullahy, John·1998·Medical Decision Making

Abstract

In recent years, considerable attention has been devoted to the development of sta tistical methods for the analysis of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness (CE) analysis, with a focus on situations in which the analyst has patient-level data on the costs and health effects of alternative interventions. To date, discussions have focused almost exclu sively on addressing the practical challenges involved in estimating confidence inter vals for CE ratios. However, the general approach of using confidence intervals to convey information about uncertainty around CE ratio estimates suffers from theoretical limitations that render it inappropriate in many situations. The authors present an al ternative framework for analyzing uncertainty in the economic evaluation of health interventions (the "net health benefits" approach) that is more broadly applicable and that avoids some problems of prior methods. This approach offers several practical and theoretical advantages over the analysis of CE ratios, is straightforward to apply, and highlights some important principles in the theoretical underpinnings of CE anal ysis. Key words: cost-effectiveness; net health benefits; uncertainty. (Med Decis Mak ing 1998;18 suppl:S68-S80)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0272989x98018002s09

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Manski CF, 1988, Analog Estimation Models in Econometrics
  2. Manning WG, 1996, Reflecting uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis, 10.1093/oso/9780195108248.003.0008 · DOI
  3. 10.1097/00005650-199402000-00006 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1017/CBO9780511625817.008 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511625817.008
  5. 10.1002/hec.4730040503 · DOI
  6. Poirier DJ, 1995, Intermediate Statistics and Econometrics
  7. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960715)15:13<1447::AID-SIM267>3.0.CO;2-V · DOI · Paper page
  8. Kelly AE, 1996, Cost-effectiveness of strategies to prevent neural tube defects, 10.1093/oso/9780195108248.005.0002 · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195108248.005.0002
  9. 10.2165/00019053-199711050-00008 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Davidson R., 1993, MacKinnon JG. Estimation and Inference in Econometrics
  12. Mullahy J., 1996, Med Care., 34, DS124
  13. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199609)5:5<470::AID-HEC224>3.0.CO;2-5 · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199609)5:5<470::aid-hec224>3.0.co;2-5
  14. 10.1177/0272989X9701700414 · DOI
  15. Matchar DB, 1995, Med Decis Making., 15, 420
  16. 10.1016/S0197-2456(95)00259-6 · doi:10.1016/s0197-2456(95)00259-6
  17. Mullahy J., 1997, Which cost-effectiveness ratio? Using cost and effectiveness data to value medical technologies
  18. 10.1016/0167-6296(93)90005-Y · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1177/0272989X9401400308 · DOI
  20. Comparative Benefits, 1992, Modeling Project. A framework for cost-utility analysis of government health care programs: a report to the Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, in cooperation with the Foundation for Health Services Research
  21. 10.1002/hec.4730030505 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Siegel JE, 1996, Reporting cost-effectiveness studies and results, 10.1093/oso/9780195108248.003.0009 · DOI
  23. 10.1017/CBO9781139167635 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1007/978-1-349-20568-4_34 · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-20568-4_34
  25. 10.1287/mnsc.28.6.698 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.28.6.698
  26. Kroll Y., 1980, Research in Finance., 2, 163
  27. 10.1016/0022-0531(70)90038-4 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/0022-0531(71)90034-2 · DOI
  29. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199607)5:4<297::AID-HEC216>3.0.CO;2-T · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199607)5:4<297::aid-hec216>3.0.co;2-t
  30. Fieller EC, 1954, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 16, 175, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1954.tb00159.x · DOI · Paper page
  31. Weinstein MC, 1995, From cost-effectiveness ratios to resource allocation : where to draw the line
  32. 10.1016/S0167-6296(96)00493-6 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1080/09332480.1996.10555000 · doi:10.1080/09332480.1996.10555000
  34. 10.1017/S0266462300004803 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/S0167-6296(96)00506-1 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1016/S0167-6296(96)00507-3 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Mishan EJ, 1976, Cost-Benefit Analysis
  38. Pauly MV, 1995, Valuing health care benefits in monetary terms

Cited by

See all 1,102

Metadata

Authors
Stinnett, A. A., & Mullahy, J.
Venue
Medical Decision Making
Published
1998-04
Volume
18
Issue
2_suppl
Pages
S68-S80
ISSN
  • 0272-989X (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-681X
OpenAlex
W3122426397
Cited by
1,102
References
0
FWCI
51.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Net Health Benefits: A New Framework for the Analysis of Uncertainty in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0272989x98018002s09
The paper
Stinnett, A. A., & Mullahy, J. (1998). Net Health Benefits: A New Framework for the Analysis of Uncertainty in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Medical Decision Making. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x98018002s09

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.